Open Access
Volume 36, Number 5, October 2018
Page(s) 848 - 855
Published online 17 December 2018
  1. Ümran Esendemir. An Experimental Study of Mechanically Fastened Composite Joints with Clearance[J]. International Journal of Damage Mechanics, 2011, 20(3): 464-480 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chang F K, Lessard L B. Damage Tolerance of Laminated Composites Containing an Open Hole and Subjected to Compressive Loadings:Part Ⅰ-Analysis[J]. Journal of Composite Materials, 1991, 25(1): 44-64 [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Camanho P P, Matthews F L. A Progressive Damage Model for Mechanically Fastened Joints in Composite Laminates[J]. Journal of Composite Materials, 1999, 33(24): 2248-2280 [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Tserpes K I, Papanikos P, Kermanidis T. A three-Dimensional Progressive Damage Model for Bolted Joints in Composite Laminates Subjected to Tensile Loading[J]. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 2010, 24(10): 663-675 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Olmedo A, Santiuste C, Barbero E. An Analytical Model for Predicting the Stiffness and Strength of Pinned-Joint Composite Laminates[J]. Composites Science & Technology, 2014, 90(90): 67-73 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dano M L, Gendron G, Picard A. Stress and Failure Analysis of Mechanically Fastened Joints in Composite Laminates[J]. Composite Structures, 2000, 50(3): 287-296 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhou Y, Nezhad H Y, Hou C, et al. A three Dimensional Implicit Finite Element Damage Model and Its Application to Single-Lap Multi-Bolt Composite Joints with Variable Clearance[J]. Composite Structures, 2015, 131: 1060-1072 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Zhou Y, Yazdani-Nezhad H, Mccarthy M A, et al. A Study of Intra-Laminar Damage in Double-Lap, Multi-Bolt, Composite Joints with Variable Clearance Using Continuum Damage Mechanics[J]. Composite Structures, 2014, 116(1): 441-452 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bodjona K, Lessard L. Nonlinear Static Analysis of a Composite Bonded/Bolted Single-Lap Joint Using the Mesh-Free Radial Point Interpolation Method[J]. Composite Structures, 2015, 134: 1024-1035 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Tang Y, Zhou Z, Pan S, et al. Mechanical Property and Failure Mechanism of 3D Carbon-Carbon Braided Composites Bolted Joints under Unidirectional Tensile Loading[J]. Materials & Design, 2015, 65(65): 243-253 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Li Xuan, Chen Xiuhua, Shi Xiaohui, et al. Effect of Bimodularity on Failure Behaviors of Pinned-Joint Composite Laminates[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2015, 49(1): 101-108 (in Chinese) [Article] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wei Jingchao, Jiao Guiqiong, Yan Zhaoming, et al. Bearing Strength of Composite Joints Interference-Fitted with Blind Bolts[J]. Acta Aeronauticaet Astronsutica Sinica, 2013, 34(7): 1627-1635 (in Chinese) [Article] [Google Scholar]
  13. Liu Xiangdong, Li Yazhi, Su Jie, et al. A Method to Evaluate Bearing Strength and Stiffness of Composite Joints[J]. Journal of Aeronautical Materials, 2014, 34(5): 81-87 (in Chinese) [Article] [Google Scholar]
  14. Liu Xiangdong, Li Yazhi, Li Biao, et al. On Numeric al Modeling and Tensile Strength of Bolted Composite Joints[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2013, 31(6): 878-883 (in Chinese) [Article] [Article] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hahn H T, Tsai S W. Nonlinear Elastic Behavior of Unidirectional Composite Laminates[J]. Journal of Composite Materials, 1973, 7(1): 102-118 [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Puck A, Schürmann H. Failure Analysis of FRP Laminates by Means of Physically Based Phenomenological Models[J]. Composites Science & Technology, 2002, 62(12): 1633-1662 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.