EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 37 / No 6 (December 2019) JNWPU, 37 6 (2019) 1129-1137 References
Open Access
Issue
JNWPU
Volume 37, Number 6, December 2019
Page(s) 1129 - 1137
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/jnwpu/20193761129
Published online 11 February 2020
  1. Dobrzynski W. Almost 40 Years of Airframe Noise Research:What Did We Achieve?[J]. Journal of aircraft, 2010, 47(2): 353–367 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  2. Li Weipeng. Review of the Mechanism and Noise Control of High-Lift Device Noise[J]. Acta Aerodynamic Sinica, 2018, 36(3): 372–384, 409 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  3. Guo Y P, Yamamoto K J, Stoker R W. Component-Based Empirical Model for High-Lift System Noise Prediction[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2003, 40(5): 914–922 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Pascioni K, Cattafesta L N, Choudhari M M. An Experimental Investigation of the 30P30N Multi-Element High-Lift Airfoil[C]//20th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, 2014 [Google Scholar]
  5. Lockard D P, Choudhari M. The Variation of Slat Noise with Mach and Reynolds Numbers[C]//17th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, 2011 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chow L, Mau K, Remy H. Landing Gears and High LiftDevices Airframe Noise Research[C]//8th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference and Exhibit, 2002 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  7. Choudhari M M, Lockard D P, Macaraeg M G, et al. Aeroacoustic Experiments In The Langley Low-Turbulence Pressure Tunnel[R]. NASA TM 211432, 2002 [Google Scholar]
  8. Roger M. The Use of Amiet's Methods in Predicting the Noise from 2D High-Lift Devices[C]//6th Aeroacoustics Conference and Exhibit, 2000 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dobrzynski W, Pott-Pollenske M. Slat Noise Source Studies for Farfield Noise Prediction[C]//7th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference and Exhibit, 2001 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kolb A, Faulhaber P, Drobietz R, et al. Aeroacoustic Wind Tunnel Measurements on a 2D High-Lift Configuration[J]. AIAA Journal, 2007 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rossiter J E. Wind Tunnel Experiments on the Flow Over Rectangular Cavities at Subsonic and Transonic Speed[R]. Royal Aircaraft Establrshment ARC R & M, NO.3438, 1964 [Google Scholar]
  12. König D, Koh S R, Meinke M, et al. Two-Step Simulation of Slat Noise[J]. Computers and Fluids, 2010, 39(3): 512–524 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Liu Peiqing, Li Ling, Xing Yu, et al. Developments of Aeroacoustic Inrestigation on High-Hift Derice for Large Aircrafts[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2017, 35(4): 472–484 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  14. Andreou C, Graham W, Shin H C. Aeroacoustic Study of Airfoil Leading Edge High-Lift Devices[C]//12th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, 2006: 2515 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  15. Imamura Taro, Hiroki Ura, Yuzuru Yokokawa, et al. Designing of Slatcove Filler as a Noise Redution Device for Leading-Edge Slat[C]//13th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, 2007 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  16. Pagani C C, Souza D S, Medeiros M A F, et al. Experimental Investigation on the Effect of Slat Geometrical Configurations on Aerodynamic Noise[J]. Journal of Sound & Vibration, 2017, 394: 256–279 [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Spalart P R, Allmaras S R. A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows[C]//AIAA 30th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 1992 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  18. Shur M, Spalart P R, Strelets M, et al. Detached-Eddy Simulation of an Airfoil at High Angle of Attack[C]//Engineering Turbulende Modeling and Experiments 4, 1999: 669–678 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  19. Spalart P R, Deck S, Shur M L, et al. A New Version of Detached-Eddy Simulation, Resistant to Ambiguous Grid Densities[J]. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 2006, 20(3): 181–195 [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ffowcs Williams J E, Hawkings D L. Sound Generation by Turbulence and Surfaces in Arbitrary Motion, Royal Society of London Philosophical[J]. Trans Series A, 1969, 264(1151): 321–342 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  21. Imamura F, Enomoto S, Yokokawa Y, et al. Three-Dimensional Unsteady Flow Computations around a Conventional Slat of High-Lift Devices[J]. AIAA Journal, 2008, 46(5): 1045–1053 [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lockard D, Choudhari M. Noise Radiation from a Leading-Edge Slat[C]//15th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, 2009 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  23. Murayama M, Nakakita K, Yamamoto K, et al. Experimentalstudy of Slat Noise from 30P30N Three-Element High-Lift Airfoil in JAXA Hard-Walllow-Speed Wind Tunnel[J]. AIAA Journal, 2014 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  24. N. Jenkins L, R. Khorrami M, Choudhari M. Characterization of Unsteady Flow Structures Near Leading-Edge Slat: Part Ⅰ: PIV Measurements[C]//10th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, 2004 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  25. Choudhari M M, Khorrami M R, Lockard D P. Slat Cove Noise: 30P30N 3-Element, Simplified High-Lift Configuration(Modified Slat), Guidelines for Category 7 of BANC-Ⅱ Workshop[C]//19th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoutics Conference, 2012 [Google Scholar]
  26. Choudhari M M, Lockard D P. Assessment of Slat Noise Predictions for 30P30N High-Lift Configuration from BANC-Ⅲ workshop[C]//21st AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, 2015 [Google Scholar]
  27. Powell Alan. Theory of Vortex Sound[J]. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1964, 36(1): 177 [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Howe M S, Theory of Vortex Sound[M]. New York, Cambridge University Press, 2002 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.