EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 39 / No 3 (June 2021) JNWPU, 39 3 (2021) 521-528 References
Open Access
Issue
JNWPU
Volume 39, Number 3, June 2021
Page(s) 521 - 528
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/jnwpu/20213930521
Published online 09 August 2021
  1. Suo Jinli, Liu Yebin, Ji Xiangyang, et al. Computational photography: keys, methods and applications[J]. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2015, 41(4): 669–685 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  2. Ng R. Digital light field photography[D]. San Francisco: Stanford University, 2006 [Google Scholar]
  3. Zhang Q, Wang Q, Li H, Yu J. Ray-space epipolar geometry for light field cameras[EB/OL]. (2020-09-22)[2020-10-22]. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2020.3025949 [Google Scholar]
  4. Nousias S, Lourakis M, Bergeles C. Large-scale, metric structure from motion for unordered light fields[C]//IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Long Beach, United States, 2019 [Google Scholar]
  5. Birklbauer C, Bimber O. Panorama light-field imaging[J]. Computer Graphics Forum, 2014, 33(2): 43–52 10.1111/cgf.12289 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Zeller N, Quint F, Stilla U. From the calibration of a light-field camera to direct plenoptic odometry[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 2017, 11(7): 1004–1019 10.1109/JSTSP.2017.2737965 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dansereau D G, Pizarro O, Williams S B. Decoding, calibration and rectification for lenselet-based plenoptic cameras[C]//IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Portland, United States, 2013: 1027–1034 [Google Scholar]
  8. Zhang Q, Zhang C, Ling J, Wang Q, Yu J. A generic multi-projection-center model and calibration method for light field cameras[J]. IEEE Trans on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2019, 41(11): 2539–2552 10.1109/TPAMI.2018.2864617 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhang Q, Ling J, Wang Q, Yu J. Ray-space projection model for light field camera[C]//IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Long Beach, United States, 2019: 10121–10129 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bok Y, Jeon H G, Kweon I S. Geometric calibration of micro-lens-based light field cameras using line features[J]. IEEE Trans on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2017, 39(2): 287–300 10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2541145 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhang Q, Wang Q. Common self-polar triangle of concentric conics for light field camera calibration[C]//Asian Conference on Computer Vision, Perth, Australia, 2018: 18–33 [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhang Q, Wang X, Wang Q. Light field planar homography and its application[C]//Optoelectronic Imaging and Multimedia Technology VI, Hangzhou, China, 2019 [Google Scholar]
  13. Hartley R, Zisserman A. Multiple view geometry in computer vision[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003 [Google Scholar]
  14. Huang H, Zhang H, Cheung YM. The common self-polar triangle of concentric circles and its application to camera calibration[C]//IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Boston, United States, 2015: 4065–4072 [Google Scholar]
  15. Levoy M, Hanrahan P. Light field rendering[C]//Special Interest Group for Computer Graphics, New Orleans, United States, 1996: 31–42 [Google Scholar]
  16. Faugeras O. Three-dimensional computer vision: a geometric viewpoint[M]. United States: MIT Press, 1993 [Google Scholar]
  17. Madsen K, Nielsen HB, Tingleff O. Methods for non-linear least squares problems[M]. Denmark: Technical University of Denmark, 2004 [Google Scholar]
  18. LYTRO. Lytro redefines photography with light field cameras[EB/OL]. (2011-06-22)[2020-10-22]. http://www.lytro.com [Google Scholar]
  19. Canny J. A computational approach to edge detection[J]. IEEE Trans on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1986(6): 679–698 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.