Open Access
Volume 39, Number 5, October 2021
Page(s) 1150 - 1157
Published online 14 December 2021
  1. Xiang Weicheng, Yu Cungui, Wang Kai, et al. Multi-objective topology optimization design for a certain naval gun carriage[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2016, 41(6) : 149–152. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  2. Yue Jiong. Modal Matching analysis and optimization of a naval gun[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Science and Technology, 2016 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  3. Yang Fan. Study on the natural frequency and dynamic characteristics of a gun[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Science and Technology, 2013 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  4. Huang Guanming, Yang Hongliang, Zhang Jianbo, et al. Topology optimization design of a certain type of naval gun bracket based on Ansys[J]. Ship Science and Technology, 2018, 40(5) : 142–145 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  5. Fu Wei, Wu Qiong, Cui Yunshan, et al. Optimization of anti-vibration performance of naval gun barrel[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2019, 40(2) : 234–242 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  6. Fu Wei, Wu Qiong, Gong Junjun, et al. Structural optimization of large caliber naval gun cradle[J]. Applied Science and Technology, 2020, 47(1) : 118–122 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  7. Fu Wei, Wu Qiong, Zhao Shufan, et al. Vibration reduction analysis of naval gun diameter cylinder based on dynamic vibration absorber[J]. Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering, 2020, 41(10) : 91–95. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  8. Cui Yunshan. Research on dynamic characteristics and vibration optimization of the large caliber naval gun launch system[D]. Harbin: Harbin Engineering University, 2019 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  9. Wei Hao. Dynamic analysis of nonlinear finite element structure of a shipboard gun[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Science and Technology, 2015 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  10. Kristjan Tabri, Jukka Määttänen, Janne Ranta. Model-scale experiments of symmetric ship collisions[J]. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 2008, 13(1) : 71–84. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gao Yushan, Liu Xiaoyong, Jin Ping. Reduced-scale test of gas-gas combustion similarity in full-flow stage combustion engine[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2019, 40(7) : 1554–1559 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  12. Liu Yang, Wang Yanfu, Zhang Xiaolei. Similarity demonstration of tunnel with roof openings fire-prevention model design[J].Journal of Safety and Environment, 2014, 14(5) : 90–93 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  13. Yu Jia, Tian Hui, Cai Guobiao. Investigation on scale effects of hybrid rocket engines[J]. Journal of Rocket Propulsion, 2015, 41(2) : 33–37. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  14. Staples L R, Reitz R D, Hergart C. An experimental investigation into diesel engine size-scaling parameters[J]. SAE International Journal of Engines, 2009, 2(1) : 1068–1084. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  15. Tess M J, Lee C W, Reitz R D. Diesel engine size scaling at medium load without EGR[J]. SAE International Journal of Engines, 2011, 4(1) : 1993–2009. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wang Lufei, Gu Bo, Wang Ting. Fast calculation model of fan performance based on similarity theory[J]. Fluid Machinery, 2012, 40(7) : 24–28 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  17. Ge Meng. Research on vibration similarity of hoop truss antenna based on similarity theory[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2015 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  18. Li Wanli, Zhou Xiaofei, Liu Xiangyong. Scaled model design, simulation and testing on the floating crane boom system[J]. Fluid Power Transmission and Control, 2016(6) : 28–33. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  19. Wang Wenjun. Similitude method research on dynamic characteristics of flexible truss boom[D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2017 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.