EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 40 / No 3 (June 2022) JNWPU, 40 3 (2022) 592-601 References
Open Access
Issue
JNWPU
Volume 40, Number 3, June 2022
Page(s) 592 - 601
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/jnwpu/20224030592
Published online 19 September 2022
  1. LEFEBVRE A H. Gas turbine combustion[M]. Hemisphere: Taylor & Francis, 1999 [Google Scholar]
  2. JIN Rushan, SUO Jianqin. Advanced gas turbine combustor[M]. Beijing: Aviation Industry Press, 2016 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  3. LEE C, CHANG C T, HERBON J T, et al. NASA environmentally responsible aviation project develops next-generation low-emissions combustor technologies(phaseⅠ)[J]. Journal of Aeronautics & Aerospace Engineering, 2013, 2(4): 1–17. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  4. VILLALVA R, DOLAN B, MUNDAY D, et al. Medium pressure emissions of a multi-point low NOx combustion system[C]//ASME Turbo Expo 2013, 2013 [Google Scholar]
  5. ACOSTA W A, CHANG Clarence. Experimental combustion dynamics behavior of a multi-element lean direct injection(LDI) gas turbine combustor[C]//52nd AIAA/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, 2016 [Google Scholar]
  6. HE Zhuohui, CHANG Clarence. Combustion dynamic characteristics identification in a 9-point LDI combustor under choked outlet boundary conditions[C]//55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 2017 [Google Scholar]
  7. HEATH C M. Characterization of swirl-venturi lean direct injection designs for aviation gas turbine combustion[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2014, 30(5): 1334–1356. [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. WEY C T, LIU N. Updates to simulation of a single-element lean-direct injection combustor using a polyhedral mesh derived from hanging-node elements[C]//52nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 2014 [Google Scholar]
  9. CHANG C T, LEE P. An assessment of combustion dynamics in a low-NOx, second-generation swirl-venturi lean direct injection combustion concept[C]//2015 International Society for Air Breathing Engines, 2015 [Google Scholar]
  10. GOEKE J, PACK S, EINK G, et al., Multi-point combustion system final report[R]. NASA/CR-2014-218112 [Google Scholar]
  11. TACINA K M. A comparison of three second-generation swirl-venturi lean direct injection combustor concepts[C]//52nd AIAA/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, 2016 [Google Scholar]
  12. HICKS Y R, TACINA K M. Flow structure comparison for two 7-Point LDI configurations[R]. GRC-E-DAA-TN42068, 2017 [Google Scholar]
  13. TACINA K M, HICKS Y R. A comparison of combustion dynamics for multiple 7-point lean direct injection combustor configurations[C]//10th US National Combustion Meeting, 2017 [Google Scholar]
  14. ZENG Qinghua. Theoretic and experimental studies on lean direct injection combustor[D]. Beijing: the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2013 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  15. ZHANG Qun, XU Huasheng, ZHONG Huagui, et al. Numerical simulation of flowfield in a multi-swirler array lean direct injection combustor[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2009, 24(3): 483–487. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  16. YU Han, ZHU Pengfei, SUO Jianqin, et al. Investigation of discharge coefficients for single element lean direct injection modules[J]. Energies, 2018, 11(6): 1603. [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. YU Han, SUO Jianqin, ZHENG Longxi. Investigation of non-reaction and reaction flow characteristic of single element lean direct injection combustor with convergent outlet[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2019, 40(3): 608–618. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  18. FU Y. Aerodynamics and combustion of axial swirlers[D]. Cincinnati: University of Cincinnati, 2008 [Google Scholar]
  19. LI Le, SUO Jianqin, YU Han, et al. Optimal design and application of gas analysis system[J]. Journalof Norhwestern Polytechnical University, 2020, 38(1): 104–113 [Article] (in Chinese) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.