Open Access
Volume 41, Number 1, February 2023
Page(s) 198 - 208
Published online 02 June 2023
  1. LI Chunlei, LI Liang, WANG Xiaoye. Similarity measurement of the geometry variation sequence of intermediate process model[J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2021, 35(7): 3089–3100. [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. LIU Shunuan, ZHANG Zhenming, TIAN Xitian. A typical process route discovery method based on clustering analysis[J]. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2007, 35(1/2): 186–194 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. ZHANG Hui, QIU Lemiao, ZHANG Shuyou, et al. Typical product process route extraction method based on intelligent clustering analysis[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2013, 19(3): 490–498. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  4. ZHOU Danchen, DAI Xuan. A method for discovering typical process sequence using granular computing and similarity algorithm based on part features[J]. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2015, 78(9/10/11/12): 1781–1793 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. LI Chunlei, MO Rong, CHANG Zhiyong, et al. Multi-dimensional manufacturing information based typical product process route discovery method[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2015, 51(15): 148–157. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  6. LI Chunlei, MO Rong, CHANG Zhiyong, et al. A multifactor decision-making method for process route planning[J]. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2017, 90(5): 1789–1808 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. KAMBHAMPATI Subbarao. Mapping and retrieval during plan reuse: a validation structure based approach[C]//Proceedings of AAAI Conference, 1990: 170–175 [Google Scholar]
  8. FAN Wuyang, ZHANG Yongjian, WANG Lin, et al. Typical machining process mining of servo valve parts based on self-adaptive affinity propagation custering[C]//Proceedings of IEEE International Computers, Signals and Systems Conference, Dalian, China, 2018: 674–678 [Google Scholar]
  9. PENG W P, ZHANG T, ZHANG Q H, et al. Mining and analyzing process similarity of product module for DPIPP based on PLM database[C]//Proceedings of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Geelong, Australia, 2019: 012004 [Google Scholar]
  10. WU Zhongyi, LIU Weidong, ZHENG Weijie, et al. Manufacturing process similarity measurement model and application based on process constituent elements[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2021, 59(14): 4205–4227. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  11. HARTIGAN J A, WONG M A. Algorithm as 136:a K-means clustering algorithm[J]. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 1979, 28(1): 100–108 [Google Scholar]
  12. ZHAO Yanping, ZHOU Xiaolai. K-means clustering algorithm and its improvement research[J]. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 2021, 1(1873): 012074 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  13. KHAN Zahid, FANG Sangsha, KOUBAA Anis, et al. Street-centric routing scheme using ant colony optimization-based clustering for bus-based vehicular AD-Hoc network[J]. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 2020, 86(1): 106736. [Google Scholar]
  14. CUI Guorong, LI Hao, ZHANG Yachuan, et al. Weighted particle swarm clustering algorithm for self-organizing maps[J]. Journal of Quantum Computing, 2020, 2(2): 85–95. [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. CHENG Fengxin, SHAO Caixing. Research on artificial fish swarm clustering algorithm in urban internet of vehicles[C]//Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Smart Internet of Things, Beijing, China, 2020: 328–332 [Google Scholar]
  16. WANG Limin, WANG Honghuan, HAN Xuming, et al. A novel adaptive density-based spatial clustering of application with noise based on bird swarm optimization algorithm[J]. Computer Communications, 2021, 174: 205–214. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  17. CHANG H C, DONG L, LIU F X. Indexing and retrieval in machining process planning using case-based reasoning[J]. Artificial Intelligence in Engineering, 2000, 14(1): 1–13. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  18. JIANG Zhigang, JIANG Ya, WANG Yan, et al. A hybrid approach of rough set and case-based reasoning to remanufacturing process planning[J]. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2019, 30(1): 19–32. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  19. LI Shengqiang, ZHANG Hua, YAN Wei, et al. A hybrid method of blockchain and case-based reasoning for remanufacturing process planning[J]. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2021, 32(5): 1389–1399. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  20. ZHAO Zuopeng, YIN Zhimin, WANG Qianping, et al. An improved algorithm of levenshtein distance and its application in data processing[J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2009, 29(2): 424–426. [Article] (in Chinese) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. BERGER Bonnie, WATERMAN Michael S, YU Yunwilliam, et al. Levenshtein distance, sequence comparison and biological database search[J]. IEEE Trans on Information Theory, 2021, 67(6): 3287–3294. [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. BABA Kensuke, NAKATOH Tetsuya, MINAMI Minami. Plagiarism detection using document similarity based on distributed representation[J]. Procedia Computer Science, 2017, 111: 382–387. [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. SHI Rongxin. Social network classification system based on network representation learning[D]. Xi'an: Xidian University, 2019 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.