Open Access
Volume 41, Number 2, April 2023
Page(s) 319 - 328
Published online 07 June 2023
  1. THOMAS N L, VINCENT F A, YVES D. CFD/CAA coupling strategies for rearward fan noise[R]. AIAA-2018-4089 [Google Scholar]
  2. LABAN M, KOK J C, BROUWER H H. CFD/CAA analysis of UHBR engine tonal noise[R]. AIAA-2018-3780 [Google Scholar]
  3. ANSGAR N, MATHIAS M, WOLFGANG S, et al. Noise reduction using a direct-hybrid CFD/CAA method[R]. AIAA-2019-2579 [Google Scholar]
  4. TERRACOL M, MANOHA E, HERRERO C, et al. Hybrid methods for airframe noise numerical prediction[J]. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 2005, 19(3): 197–227 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. BERNICKE P, AKKERMANS R A D. Overset LES for trailing-edge noise computations[R]. AIAA-2017-3170 [Google Scholar]
  6. ZHANG Y F, CHEN H X. Aeroacoustic prediction of a multi-element airfoil using wall-modeled large-eddy simulation[J]. AIAA Journal, 2017, 55(12): 4219–4233 [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. WEI Jiayun, LI Weipeng, XU Siwei, et al. Analysis of mechanism of slat low frequency noise based on zonal DMD[J]. Acta Aeronautica er Astronautica Sinica, 2018, 39(1): 121469 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  8. YAO H D, DAVIDSON L. Assessment of conceptual noise reduction devices for a main landing gear using SNGR method[R]. AIAA-2015-2692 [Google Scholar]
  9. YU Peixun, PAN Kai, BAI Junqiang, et al. Computational aero-acoustics prediction method based on fast random particle mesh[J]. Acta Acustica, 2018, 12(5): 817–828 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  10. HAN X, YU P X, BAI J Q, et al. Hybrid computational aeroacoustics approach based on the synthetic turbulence model in eulerian description[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2020, 106106077 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. CHEN Rongqian, WU Yizhao, XIA Jian. Numerical simulation of two-dimensional cavity noise by SNGR method[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, 2012, 41(1): 56–60 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  12. LYU Hongqiang, ZHU Guoxiang, SONG Jiangyong, et al. High-order discontinuous galerkin solution of linearized Euler equations[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2011, 43(3): 611–624 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  13. EWERT R, DIERKE J, NEIFELD A. Linear and non-linear perturbation equations with relaxation source terms for forced eddy simulation of aeroacoustic sound generation[R]. AIAA-2014-3053 [Google Scholar]
  14. GAO J H, LI X D. Improved grid block interface flux reconstruction method for high-order finite difference scheme[J]. AIAA Journal, 2005, 53(7): 1761–1773 [Google Scholar]
  15. YU P X, BAI J Q, PAN K. Interface flux reconstruction method based on optimized weight essentially non-oscillatory scheme[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2018, 31(5): 1020–1029 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. OVAIS U K, GHULAM A. Simulation of acoustic radiations over an open cavity using high-resolution numerical scheme[R]. AIAA-2020-1750 [Google Scholar]
  17. TERRACOL M, MANOHA E, HERRERO C, et al. Hybrid methods for airframe noise numerical prediction[J]. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 2005, 19197–227 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. VASANTH A, RAY H. High-accuracy large-step explicit Runge-Kutta(HALE-RK) schemes for computational aeroacoustics[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2009, 2283837–3850 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. HU F Q, HUSSAIN M Y. Low dissipation and dispersion Runge-Kutta schemes for computation acoustics[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1996, 124(1): 177–191 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. TAM C K W, AURIAULT L. Perfectly matched layer as absorbing boundary condition for the linearized euler equations in open and ducted domains[R]. AIAA-2001-0217 [Google Scholar]
  21. SEONGKYU L, JESSICA G S. Prediction of airfoil trailing-edge noise using empirical wall-pressure spectrum models[J]. AIAA Journal, 2019, 57(3): 888–897 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. BROOK P. Fourth computational aeroacoustics(CAA) workshop on benchmark problems[R]. NASA/CP-2004-212954 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.