EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 41 / No 3 (June 2023) JNWPU, 41 3 (2023) 601-611 References
Open Access
Issue
JNWPU
Volume 41, Number 3, June 2023
Page(s) 601 - 611
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/jnwpu/20234130601
Published online 01 August 2023
  1. QIN D, PAN G, HUANG Q, et al. Numerical investigation of different tip clearances effect on the hydrodynamic performance of pumpjet propulsor[J]. International Journal of Computational Methods, 2018, 15(5): 1850037. [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. QIN D, PAN G, LEE S, et al. Underwater radiated noise reduction technology using sawtooth duct for pumpjet propulsor[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2019, 188: 106228. [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. WANG Tiankui, TANG Denghai. Pump jet propulsion-a low noise nuclear submanine propulsion method[J]. Modern Military, 2006, 7: 52–54. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  4. EISENHUTH J, MC CORMICK B W. Design and performance of propellers and pumpjets for underwater propulsion[J]. AIAA Journal, 2012, 1(10): 2348–2354 [Google Scholar]
  5. SURYANARAYANA C, SATYANARAYANA B, RAMJI K, et al. Cavitation studies on axi-symmetric underwater body with pumpjet propulsor in cavitation tunnel[J]. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 2010, 2(4): 185–194. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  6. SURYANARAYANA C, SATYANARAYANA B, RAMJI K, et al. Experimental evaluation of pumpjet propulsor for an axisymmetric body in wind tunnel[J]. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 2010, 2(1): 24–33. [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. SURYANARAYANA CH, ROY S P, SATEESH KUMAR M. Hydrodynamic performance evaluation of an underwater body by model testing in cavitation tunnel[C]//International Conference in Marine Hydrodynamics, NSTL, Visakhapatnam, India, 2006 [Google Scholar]
  8. QIN Denghui, HUANG Qiaogao, SHI Yao, et al. Comparison of hydrodynamic performance and wake vortices of two typical types of pumpjet propulsor[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2021, 224: 108700. [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. QIN D, HUANG Q, PAN G, et al. Numerical simulation of vortex instabilities in the wake of a preswirl pumpjet propulsor[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2021, 33(5): 055119. [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. QIN D, HUANG Q, PAN G , et al. Effect of the duct and the pre-swirl stator on the wake dynamics of a pre-swirl pumpjet propulsor[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2021, 237: 109620. [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. QIN D, HUANG Q, PAN G, et al. Effect of the odd and even number of blades on the hydrodynamic performance of a pre-swirl pumpjet propulsor[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2022, 34(3): 035120. [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. SHU Liwei, LI Liang, LIU Dengcheng. Experimental investigation of pressure fluctuation on duct for a ducted propeller with pre-strut[J]. Shipbuilding of China, 2017, 58(2): 1–9. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  13. SUN Xiaoshuai, MA Cheng, QIAN Zhengfang, et al. Numerical and experimental investigation on self-propulsion factors of surface pumpjet[J]. Journal of Ship Mechanics, 2022, 26(5): 609–616. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  14. WANG Guoqiang, YANG Chenjun. Hydrodynamic performance prediction of ducted propeller with stators[J]. Journal of Ship Mechanics, 1999(3): 1–7. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  15. WANG Guoqiang, LIU Xiaolong. A potential based panel method forprediction of steady and unsteady performances ofducted propeller with stators[J]. Journal of Ship Mechanics, 2007(3): 333–340. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  16. SU Yumin, LIU Yebao, SHEN Hailong, et al. A new method for predicting the steady performance of ducted propeller with stators[J]. Journal of Ship Mechanics, 2012, 16(9): 999–1004. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  17. LIU Yebao. Study on design method of pump jet thruster for underwater vehicles[D]. Harbin: Harbin Engineering University, 2013 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  18. RAO Zhiqiang. Numerical simulation of hydrodynamical performance of pump jet propulsor[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2012 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  19. RAO Zhiqiang, LI Wei, YANG Chenjun. The effect of stator parameters on performance of ducted propeller with pre-swirl stators[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2013, 47(2): 269–273. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  20. RAO Zhiqiang, LI Wei, YANG Chenjun. Theoretical analysis and numerical simulation of unsteady interaction forces on ducted propeller with pre-swirl stators[J]. Journal of Ship Mechanics, 2014(1): 45–53. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  21. ZHANG Kai, YE Jinming, YU Anbin. Simulation of open performance of pumpjet propeller based on block structured mesh[J]. Ship Engineering, 2018, 40(11): 52–57. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  22. YU H, ZHANG Z, HUA H. Numerical investigation of tip clearance effects on propulsion performance and pressure fluctuation of a pump-jet propulsor[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2019, 192(15): 106500.1–106500.13 [Google Scholar]
  23. HYA B, NDA B, HHA B, et al. Propulsion performance and unsteady forces of a pump-jet propulsor with different pre-swirl stator parameters-science direct[J]. Applied Ocean Research, 2020, 100: 102184. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. YU Fengning, ZOU Donglin, Rao Zhushi, et al. Analysis on exciting force of open water pump-jet and submarine with pump-jet[J]. Ship & Ocean Engineering, 2019, 48(4): 96–101. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  25. SUN Mingyu, DONG Xiaoqian, YANG Chenjun. Numerical simulation and analysis of hydrodynamic scale effect of pump-jet propulsor[J]. Journal of Unmanned Undersea Systems, 2020, 28(5): 538–546. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  26. XU Shun, JI Bin, LONG Xinping, et al. Analysis of the flow characteristics of pump-jet propeller under different inflow conditions[J]. Chinese Journal of hydrodynamics, 2020, 35(4): 411–419. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  27. DONG Xinguo, LIN Hui, YAN Peng, et al. Numerical analysis of influence of duct inclination angle and camber on interaction between pump jet and hull[J]. Ship, 2020, 31(5): 11–20. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  28. LI Fuzheng, HUANG Qiaogao, PAN Guang, et al. Effect of stator blade number on cavitation performance of pump-jet propulsor[J]. Equipment Environmental Engineering, 2022, 19(5): 56–64. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  29. LI Fuzheng, HUANG Qiaogao, PAN Guang, et al. Comparative analysis of the hydrodynamic performance of pre-swirl stator pump-jet propulsor under different rotational speeds[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2021, 39(5): 945–953. [Article] (in Chinese) [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  30. SUN Dapeng, YE Jinming, SHI Baoyong. Research on the flow field characteristic in tip gap of pump-jet propeller based on large eddy simulation[J]. Ship Science and Technology, 2022, 44(6): 95–101. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  31. SHI Shuaikang, HUANG Xiuchang, RAO Zhiqiang, et al. Study on force spectrum characteristics of a pump-jet under inflow turbulence[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2022, 17(1): 1–10. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  32. QIN Denghui, HUANG Qiaogao, PAN Guang, et al. Comparison of hydrodynamic performance and flow field between single propeller, ducted propeller and pumpjet propulsor[J]. Shipbuilding of China, 2022, 63(2): 52–65. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  33. FENG Yuan, TAO Ran. Research on characteristics and suppression of fluctuation noise disturbance of accelerative propeller[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2010, 31(6): 710–715. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  34. SONG Han, WANG Rui, XIONG Ying. Contrast experiments on the propeller noise of the Kappel propeller and the conventional propeller[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2015, 10(5): 92–98. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  35. LYU Xiaojun, ZHOU Qidou, PAN Yucun. Wall effect on ducted propellers in water tunnel test[J]. Journal of Naval University of Engineering, 2017, 29(5): 62–66. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.