EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 41 / No 4 (August 2023) JNWPU, 41 4 (2023) 732-739 References
Open Access
Issue
JNWPU
Volume 41, Number 4, August 2023
Page(s) 732 - 739
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/jnwpu/20234140732
Published online 08 December 2023
  1. YU Han, SUO Jianqin, ZHU Pengfei, et al. The characteristic of flow field and emissions of a concentric staged lean direct injection(LDI) combustor[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2018, 36(5): 816–823. [Article] (in Chinese) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  2. YU Han, SUO Jianqin, ZHENG Longxi. Investigation of non-reaction and reaction flow characteristic of single element lean direct injection combustor with convergent outlet[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2019, 40(3): 608–618. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  3. LI Le, SUO Jianqin, ZHENG Longxi. Effect of rotating direction on flow and temperature field of concentric staged combustor[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2020, 38(6): 1198–1209. [Article] (in Chinese) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  4. LI Le, SUO Jianqin, YU Han, et al. Non-reaction flow characteristic of concentric staged multi-point direct injection combustor[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2021, 42(6): 1339–1350. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  5. DUROX D, MOECK J P, BOURGOUIN J F, et al. Flame dynamics of a variable swirl number system and instability control[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2013, 160(9): 1729–1742. [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. SALVADOR F J, CARRERES M, GARCIA-TISCAR J, et al. Modal decomposition of the unsteady non-reactive flow field in a swirl-stabilized combustor operated by a Lean Premixed injection system[J]. Aerospace Scinence and Technology, 2021, 112, 106622. [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. LUCCA-NEGRO O, O'DOHERTY T. Vortex breakdown: a review[J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2001, 27(4): 431–481. [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. VASHAHI F, LEE J. On the emerging flow from a dual-axial counter-rotating swirler: LES simulation and spectral transition[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2018, 129: 646–656. [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. RANGA DINESH K K J, KIRKPATRICK M P, JENKINS K W. Investigation of the influence of swirl on a confined coannular swirl jet[J]. Computers & Fluids, 2010, 39(5): 756–767 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. VALERA-MEDINA A, SYRED N, GRIFFITHS A. Visualisation of isothermal large coherent structures in a swirl burner[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2009, 156(9): 1723–1734 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. GOMEZ-RAMIREZ D, EKKAD S V, MOON H K, et al. Isothermal coherent structures and turbulent flow produced by a gas turbine combustor lean pre-mixed swirl fuel nozzle[J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2017, 81: 187–201 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. SYRED N. A review of oscillation mechanisms and the role of the precessing vortex core (PVC) in swirl combustion systems[J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2006, 32(2): 93–161 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. HUANG D X, XU J G, CHEN R Y, et al. Large eddy simulations of turbulent combustion of kerosene-air in a dual swirl gas turbine model combustor at high pressures[J]. Fuel, 2020, 282: 118820 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. CLAYPOLE T C, SYRED N. Coherent structures in swirl generators and combustors[C]//Proceedings of the ASME Symposium Vortex Flows, Winter Annual Meeting, Chicago, 1980 [Google Scholar]
  15. LUMLEY J L. The structure of inhomogeneous turbulence flows[C]//Atmospheric Turbulence and Radio Wave Propagation, Moscow: Nauka, 1967: 166–178 [Google Scholar]
  16. POPE S B. Ten questions concerning the large-eddy simulation of turbulent flows[J]. New Journal of Physics, 2004, 6: 35 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.