Open Access
Issue
JNWPU
Volume 44, Number 2, April 2026
Page(s) 380 - 392
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/jnwpu/20264420380
Published online 12 June 2026
  1. ZHOU Meng, LI Jianyu, WANG Chang, et al. Multi-robot cooperative hunting: a survey[J]. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2024(12): 2325–2358 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  2. CAO Z, GU N, TAN M, et al. Multi-robot hunting in dynamic environments[J]. Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing, 2008, 14(1): 61–72 [Google Scholar]
  3. WU Zichen, HU Bin. Swarm rounding up method of UAV based on situation cognition[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2021, 47(2): 424–430 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  4. YANG Zihao, WANG Qingling. Multi-UAV cooperative encirclement method based on hierarchical reinforcement learning[J]. Journal of Naval Aviation University, 2025, 40(4): 567–575 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  5. ZHENG Y, FAN W, HAN M. Research on multi-agent collaborative hunting algorithm based on game theory and Q-learning for a single escaper[J]. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 2021, 40(1): 205–219 [Google Scholar]
  6. SUN Yihao, YAN Chao, XIANG Xiaojia, et al. Multi-UAV collaborative pursuit method via hierarchical reinforcement learning[J]. Control Theory & Applications, 2025(1): 96–108 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  7. XIA J, LUO Y, LIU Z, et al. Cooperative multi-target hunting by unmanned surface vehicles based on multi-agent reinforcement learning[J]. Defence Technology, 2023, 29(11): 80–94 [Google Scholar]
  8. XIA J W, LUO Y S, LIU Z K, et al. Cooperative multi-target hunting by unmanned surface vehicles based on multi-agent reinforcement learning[J]. Defence Technology, 2023, 29: 80–94. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  9. BOROUJENI Z, GOEHRING D, ULBRICH F, et al. Flexible unit A-star trajectory planning for autonomous vehicles on structured road maps[C]//2017 IEEE International Conference on Vehicular Electronics and Safety, Vienna, 2017: 7–12. [Google Scholar]
  10. ZHANG Xiangfeng, TIAN Jiaquan, JIANG Hong, et al. Application research of improved artificial potential field method in robot path planning[J]. Machinery Design & Manufacture, 2026(3): 332–336 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  11. SEIDEL R. A simple and fast incremental randomized algorithm for computing trapezoidal decompositions and for triangulating polygons[J]. Computational Geometry, 1999, 1(1): 556–564 [Google Scholar]
  12. AYANIAN N, KALLEM V, KUMAR V. Synthesis of feedback controllers for multiple aerial robots with geometric constraints[C]//2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2011: 3126–3131. [Google Scholar]
  13. WANG Qinhe, YIN Yongxin, DAI Li, et al. Trajectory planning of UAV based on Voronoi diagram and ant colony optimization algorithm[J]. Navigation Positioning & Timing, 2021(2): 66–73 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  14. LIU S, WATTERSON M, MOHTA K, et al. Planning dynamically feasible trajectories for quadrotors using safe flight corridors in 3-D complex environments[J]. IEEE Robotics & Automation Letters, 2017, 2(3): 1688–1695 [Google Scholar]
  15. DAI H, AMICE A, WERNER P, et al. Certified polyhedral decompositions of collision-free configuration space[J]. Internati-onal Journal of Robotics Research, 2024, 43(9): 1322–1341. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  16. MARCUCCI T, NOBEL P, TEDRAKE R, et al. Fast path planning through large collections of safe boxes[J]. IEEE Trans on Robotics, 2024, 40: 3795–3811 [Google Scholar]
  17. CHEN K, LIU H, LI Y, et al. Robot navigation in unknown and cluttered workspace with dynamical system modulation in starshaped roadmap[C]//2025 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation(ICRA 2025), Los Alamitos, 2025: 10140–10146. [Google Scholar]
  18. DING Derui, ZHANG Haohua, SUN Ran, et al. Map-free autonomous navigation and obstacle avoidance method of GRU-Attention-TD3 based on dual-branch perception fusion network[J/OL]. (2026-01-10)[2026-04-17]. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  19. BOUHAMED O, GHAZZAI H, BESBES H, et al. Autonomous UAV navigation: a DDPG-based deep reinforcement learning approach[C]//2020 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, Seville, 2020: 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  20. ZHAO W, QUERALTA J P, WESTERLUND T. Sim-to-real transfer in deep reinforcement learning for robotics: a survey[C]//2020 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence, Canberra, 2020 [Google Scholar]
  21. LI G, SHI L, CHEN Y, et al. Breaking the sample complexity barrier to regret-optimal model-free reinforcement learning[J]. Information and Inference: A Journal of the IMA, 2023, 12(2): 969–1043. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  22. NIU H, JI Z, ARVIN F, et al. Accelerated sim-to-real deep reinforcement learning: learning collision avoidance from human player[C]//2021 IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration, New York, 2021: 144–149. [Google Scholar]
  23. SHAO J Y, XIE G M, YU J Z, et al. Leader-following formation control of multiple mobile robots[C]//2005 IEEE International Symposium on Mediterrean Conference on Control and Automation Intelligent Control, Limassol, 2005: 808–813. [Google Scholar]
  24. BALCH T, ARKIN R C. Behavior-based formation control for multirobot teams[J]. IEEE Trans on Robotics & Automation, 1998, 14(6): 926–939 [Google Scholar]
  25. LI Zhengping, XIAN Bin. Robust distributed formation control of multiple unmanned aerial vehicles basedon virtual structure[J]. Control Theory & Applications, 2020, 37(11): 2423–2431 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  26. FANG X, XIE L. Distributed formation maneuver control using complex laplacian[J]. IEEE Trans on Automatic Control, 2024, 69(3): 1850–1857. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  27. ZHAO S. Affine formation maneuver control of multiagent systems[J]. IEEE Trans on Automatic Control, 2018, 63(12): 4140–4155. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  28. HAN Z, WANG L, LIN Z, et al. Formation control with size scaling via a complex laplacian-based approach[J]. IEEE Trans on Cybernetics, 2016, 46(10): 2348–2359 [Google Scholar]
  29. LI H, CHEN H, WANG X. Affine formation tracking control of unmanned aerial vehicles[J]. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering, 2022, 23(6): 909–919 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.