EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 36 / No 4 (August 2018) JNWPU, 36 4 (2018) 735-741 References
Open Access
Issue
JNWPU
Volume 36, Number 4, August 2018
Page(s) 735 - 741
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/jnwpu/20183640735
Published online 24 October 2018
  1. Torra V. Hesitant Fuzzy Sets[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2010, 25(2): 529-539 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  2. Xu Zeshui, Zhang Xiaolu. Hesitant Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision Making Based on TOPSIS with Incomplete Weight Information[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems 2013 52 5 53 64 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Zhu Li, Zhu Chuanxi, Zhang Xiaozhi. Hesitant Fuzzy Risk Multi-Attribute Decision Making Method Based on Prospect Theory[J]. Statistics & Decision 2014 17 68 71 (in Chinese) [Article] [Google Scholar]
  4. Liu Yunzhi, Fan Zhiping. Multiple Attribute Decision Making Considering Attribute Aspirations:A Method Based on Prospect Theory[J]. Control & Decision, 2015, 30(1): 91-97 (in Chinese) [Article] [Google Scholar]
  5. Liu Xiaodi, Zhu Jianjun, Liu Sifieng. Bi-Directional Projection Method with Hesitant Fuzzy Information[J]. System Engineering Theory & Practice, 2014, 34(10): 2637-2644 (in Chinese) [Article] [Google Scholar]
  6. Sun Lingjie, Ma Zhao, Shang Yuwei, et al. Research on Multi-Attribute Decision-Making in Condition Evaluation for Power Transformer Using Fuzzy AHP and Modified Weighted Averaging Combination[J]. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution 2016 10 15 3855 3864 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Amali Chinnappan, Ramachandran Balasubramanian. Complexity-Consistency Trade-Off in Multi-Attribute Decision Making for Vertical Handover in Heterogeneous Wireless Networks[J]. IET Networks, 2016, 5(1): 13-21 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lin Hui. An Approach to Linguistic Multi-Attribute Decision Making Based on Risk Preferences of Decision Makers[C]//Chinese Control and Decision Conference, Hefei, China, 2017: 7274-7279 [Google Scholar]
  9. Li Peng, Liu Sifeng, Zhu Jianjun. Intuitionistic Fuzzy Stochastic Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods Based on Prospect Theory[J]. Control & Decision, 2012, 27(11): 1601-1606 (in Chinese) [Article] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wang Jianqiang, Zhou Ling. Grey-Stochastic Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach Based on Prospect Theory[J]. System Engineering Theory & Practice, 2010, 30(9): 1658-1664 (in Chinese) [Article] [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhang Juan, Dang Yaoguo, Li Xuemei. Grey Multi-Criteria Risk Decision-Making Method Based on Prospect Theory[J]. Computer Engineering & Applications, 2014, 50(22): 7-10 (in Chinese) [Article] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gao Jianwei, Liu Huihui, Gu Yundong. Interval-Valued Intruitionistic Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Desision-Making Method Based on Prospect Theory[J]. System Engineering Theory & Practice, 2014, 34(12): 3175-3181 (in Chinese) [Article] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wang Xinxin, Yang Yan, Xu Zeshui, et al. Hesitant Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making Method Based on Experts Corresponding Criterion[J]. Fuzzy System & Mathematics, 2017, 31(1): 101-108 (in Chinese) [Article] [Google Scholar]
  14. Xu Z, Xia M. Hesitant Fuzzy Entropy and Cross Entropy and Their Use in Multi-Attribute Decision-Making[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2012, 27(9): 799-822 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhang Liya, Li Deqing. An Ideal Point Approach of Determining State Variable Weights Vector in Decision Making[J]. Practice & Understanding of Mathematics, 2009, 39(6): 93-97 (in Chinese) [Article] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wang Xueqin, Tang Tang. Multi-Attribute Decision Making Method under Risk Based on Cumulative Prospect Theory with Incomplete Information[J]. Fuzzy System & Mathematics 2015 29 3 137-144 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  17. Xu Z, Xia M. Distance and Similarity Measures for Hesitant Fuzzy Sets[J]. Information Science, 2011, 181(11): 2128-2138 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Xu Z, Xia M. On Distance and Correlation Measures of Hesitant Fuzzy Information[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2011, 26(5): 410-425 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Tversky A, Kahneman D. Advances in Prospect Theory:Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty[J]. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1992, 5(4): 297-323 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.