Open Access
Volume 38, Number 2, April 2020
Page(s) 309 - 318
Published online 17 July 2020
  1. Shen Chao, Li Lei, Wu Yang, et al. Research on the Capability of the U.S. Manned/Unmanned Autonomous Collaborative Operations[J]. Tactical Missile Technology, 2018, 1: 16– 21 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  2. Humphreysy C J, Cobbz R G, Jacquesx D R, et al. Optimal Mission Paths for the Uninhabited Loyal Wingman[C]//16th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Reston, 2015: 2792–2802 [Google Scholar]
  3. The Department of Defense of USA. Unmanned System Integrated Roadmap[R]. FY2013-2038, 2014 [Google Scholar]
  4. Jia Gaowei, Hou Zhongxi. The Analysis and Current Situation about the United States Military Manned/Unmanned Aerial Vehicle[J]. National Defense Science & Technology, 2017, 38 (6): 57– 59 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chakravarthy A, Ghose D. Obstacle Avoidance in a Dynamic Environment:a Collision Cone Approach[J]. IEEE Trans on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A:Systems and Humans, 1998, 28 (5): 562– 574 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Schmitt L, Fichter W. Collision-Avoidance Framework for Small Fixed-Wing Unmanned Aerial Vehicles[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2014, 37 (4): 1323– 1329 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Andriy A, Aleksandr V, Oleksandr V, et al. Improvement of the Anti Collision Method 'Velocity Obstacle' by Taking into Consideration the Pyamics of an Operating Vessel[J]. Eastern-Earopean Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2019, 6 (3): 14– 19 [Google Scholar]
  8. Kluge B, Prassler E. Recursive Probabilistic Velocity Obstacles for Reflective Navigation[J]. Field and Service Robotics, 2006, (24): 71– 79 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mujumdar A, Padhi R. Reactive Collision Avoidance of Using Nonlinear Geometric and Differential Geometric Guidance[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2012, 34 (1): 303– 311 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fiorini P, Shiller Z. Motion Planning in Dynamic Environments Using Velocity Obstacles[J]. International Journal of Robotics Research, 1998, 17 (7): 760– 772 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Yang Xiuxia, Zhou Weiwei, Zhang Yi. Automatic Obstacle Avoidance Planning for UAV Based on Velocity Obstacle Arc Method[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2017, 39 (1): 168– 177 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jenie Y I, Van Kampen E J, De Visser C C, et al. Selective Velocity Obstacle Method for Deconflicting Maneuvers Applied to Unmanned Aerial Vehicles[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2015, 38 (6): 1140– 1145 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Snape J, Van Den Berg J, Guy S. The Hybrid Reciprocal Velocity Obstacle[J]. IEEE Trans on Robotics, 2011, 4: 696– 706 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Charkravarthy A, Ghos D. Generalization of the Collision Cone Approach for Motion Safety in 3-D Environments[J]. Autonomous Robots, 2012, 32 (3): 243– 266 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. AMDT. 14 CFR § 91.113-Right-of-Way rules: Except Water Operations[R]. National Archives and Records Administration's Office of the Federal Register, 91282, 69 FR 44880, 2004 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.