Open Access
Volume 38, Number 6, December 2020
Page(s) 1275 - 1283
Published online 02 February 2021
  1. Lee S, Brentner K S, Morris P J. Prediction of Acoustic Scattering in the Time Domain Using a Moving Equivalent Source Method[R]. AIAA-2009-3177 [Google Scholar]
  2. Farassat F. Open Rotor Noise Prediction at NASA Langley-Capabilities, Research and Development[R]. NASA TM-2010-216178 [Google Scholar]
  3. Tinetti A F, Dunn M H. Aeroacoustics Noise Prediction Using the Fast Scattering Code[R]. AIAA-2005-3061 [Google Scholar]
  4. Han Zhonghua, Song Wenping, Qiao Zhide. Aeroacoustic Calculation for Helicopter Rotor in Hover and in Forward Flight Based on FW-H Equation[J]. Acta Aeronautic et Astronautic Sinica, 2003, 24 (5): 400– 404 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhao Qijun, Xu Gouhua, Wang Shicun. A Numerical Study of High-Speed Impulsive Noise of Helicopter Rotors with the CFD/Kirchhoff Method[J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Physics, 2006, 23 (2): 137– 143 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  6. Cao Yihua, Kang Pengbin, Yu Ziwen. Numerical Simulation of Airfoil-Tip Vortex Interation[J]. Jounral of Aerospace Power, 2003, 18 (3): 604– 607 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  7. Dunn M H, Tinetti A F. Application of Fast Multipole Methods to the NASA Fast Scattering Code[R]. AIAA-2008-2875 [Google Scholar]
  8. Tinetti A F, Dunn M H. Fast Scattering Code(FSC) User's Manual(Version 2.0)[R]. NASA CR-2006-214510 [Google Scholar]
  9. Dunn M H, Tinetti A F. Aeroacoustic Scattering via the Equivalent Source Method[R]. AIAA-2004-2937 [Google Scholar]
  10. Lee S, Erwin J P, Brentner K S. A Method to Predict Acoustic Scattering of Rotorcraft Noise[J]. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 2009, 54 (4): 1– 15 [Google Scholar]
  11. Lee S, Brentner K S, Morris P J. Time-Domain Approach for Acoustic Scattering of Rotorcraft Noise[C]//American Helicopter Society 64th Annual Forum Proceedings, Texas, 2009 [Google Scholar]
  12. Testa C, Ianniello S, Bernardini G, et al. Sound Scattered by a Helicopter Fuselage in Descent Flight Condition[R]. AIAA-2007-3497 [Google Scholar]
  13. Atalla N, Glegg S. A Ray-Acoustics Approach to Fuselage Scattering of Rotor Noise[R]. AIAA-1990-4013 [Google Scholar]
  14. Fan Feng, Lin Yongfeng, Huang Shuilin, et al. Numercial Simulation on Rotor/Fuselage Unsteady Interaction Flowfield Based on Hybrid Grid[J]. Journal of Naujing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, 2015, 42 (2): 180– 188 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  15. Roe P L. Approximate Riemann Solvers, Parameter Vectors, and Difference Schemes[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1981, 43 (2): 357– 372 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jameson A. Time Dependent Calculations Using Multigrid with Application to Unsteady Flows Past Airfoils and Wings[R]. AIAA-1991-1596 [Google Scholar]
  17. Luo H, Baum J D. A Fast Matrix-Free Implicit Method for Computing Low Mach Number Flows on Unstructured Grids[R]. AIAA-1999-3315 [Google Scholar]
  18. Spalart P R, Allmaras S R. An One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows[R]. AIAA-1992-0439 [Google Scholar]
  19. DI FRANCESCANTONIO P. A New Boundary Integral Formulation for the Prediction of Sound Radiation[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1997, 202 (4): 491– 509 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lee S, Brentner K S, Farassat F, et al. Analytical Formulation and Numerical Implementation of an Acoustic Pressure Gradient Prediction[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2009, 319 (2009): 1200– 1221 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Boxwell D A, Yu Y H, Schnitz F H. Hovering Impulsive Noise: Some Measured and Calculated Results[R]. NASA CP-2052 [Google Scholar]
  22. Boxwell D A, Schmitz F H, Splettstoesser W R, el al. Model Helicopter Rotor High Speed Impulsive Noise-Measured Acoustics and Blade Pressures[C]//The 9th European Rotorcraft Forum, 1983 [Google Scholar]
  23. Crouse G L, Leishman J G, Bi N. Theoretical and Experimental Study of Unsteady Rotor/Body Aerodynamic Interactions[C]//American Helicopter Society 46th Annual Forum Proceedings, Washington D C, 1990 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.