Open Access
Volume 38, Number 6, December 2020
Page(s) 1284 - 1290
Published online 02 February 2021
  1. Zhang Taoran. Structural Design of Intelligent Aircraft[J]. Henan Science and Technology, 2018 (26): 122– 123 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  2. Shang Hong, Li Yigang, Li Yanfeng, et al. Intelligent Aircraft and Disaster Rescue[J]. China Emergency Rescue, 2007 (2): 26 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  3. Kou Jiaxun. Research on Route Planning for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles under Uncertain Environment[D]. Beijing: Beijing Institute of Technology, 2016 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  4. Wang Qiong, Liu Meiwan, Ren Weijian, et al. Overview of Common Algorithms for UAV Path Planning[J]. Journal of Jilin University, 2019, 37 (1): 58– 67 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  5. Wang Lei. Research on Navigation Technology for UAV in Complex Geografic Conditions[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2013 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  6. Shen Yanhang, Zhou Zhou. A Method of Cooperative Engagement Control for Attack Uninhabited Air Vehicles[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2008 (10): 1277– 1280 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  7. Yan Jiangjiang, Ding Mingyue, Zhou Chengping, et al. 3D Route Planning Based on Feasible First Search[J]. Journal of Astronautics, 2009, 30 (1): 139– 144 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  8. Li Sujuan. Research on UAV Route Planning and Evaluation Method[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2012 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  9. Xin Peiyuan. Research on Route Planning Method of UAV Based on Complex Constraints of 3D Environment[D]. Beijing: Capital Normal University, 2014 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  10. Lin Penghong. Research on Tracking Control and Trajectory Planning of Quadrotor with Multi Constraints[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2016 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  11. Tao Jihua. Research on Path Planning Algorithms for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle[D]. Hangzhou: Hangzhou Dianzi University, 2017 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhao Yijing, Zheng Zheng, Yang Liu. Survey on Computational-Intelligence-Based UAV Path Planning[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2018, 158: 54– 64 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wu Yu. Coordinated Path Planning for an Unmanned Aerial-Aquatic Vehicle(UAAV) and an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle(AUV) in an Underwater Target Strike Mission[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2019, 182: 162– 173 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Shao Shikai, Yu Peng, He Chenglong, et al. Efficient Path Planning for UAV Formation via Comprehensively Improved Particle Swarm Optimization[J/OL]. (2019-08-18)[2020-01-06]. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jia Xin, Yang Shuwen, Zhang Zhihua, et al. A Method to Improve Positioning Accuracy of UAV Image Based on POS Data[J]. Remote Sensing Information, 2019, 34 (4): 92– 96 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  16. Tang Jin. Research on High Precision Autonomous Navigation and Monitoring Technology of UAV Based on BDS[D]. Harbin: Harbin Engineering University, 2019 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  17. Ge Changli. Investigation on High Precision GPS Positioning Method and Its Application in UAV Positioning System[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, 2018 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhang Yongming. Research on Error Elimination Technology of Remote Sensing and Positioning System for Light and Small UAV[J]. Computer Measurement & Control, 2018, 26 (5): 234– 236 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  19. Yang Zhe. The Error Compensation Technology of Aircraft Navigation System[D]. Beijing: Beijing Institute of Technology, 2016 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  20. Wu Xiande, Bai Wenbin, Xie Yaen, et al. A Hybrid Algorithm of Particle Swarm Optimization, Metropolis Criterion and RTS Smoother for Path Planning of UAVs[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2018, 73: 735– 747 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.