Open Access
Volume 39, Number 3, June 2021
Page(s) 660 - 667
Published online 09 August 2021
  1. Wu Rongli, Wang Zhenyu. Wind tunnel design principle[M]. Beijing: Beijing Aeronautical Institute Press, 1985(in chinese) [Google Scholar]
  2. Glazkov S A, Gorbushin A R, Ivanov A I, et al. Numerical and experimental investigations of slot flow with respect to wind tunnel wall interference assessment[C]//24th AIAA Aerodynamic Measurement Technology and Ground Testing Conference, Reston, 2004 [Google Scholar]
  3. Liu Guangyue, Wei Zhi, Peng Xing, et al. Application of slotted wall interference assessment and correction technique in transonic wind tunnel[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2018, 39 (2): 121499 [Article](in chinese) [Google Scholar]
  4. Atsushi H, Masataka K, Takashi A, et al. Wall interference analysis of transonic wind tunnel with porous wall model[C]//29th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, 2011 [Google Scholar]
  5. Taisuke N, Atsushi H, Keiichi M, et al. Numerical analysis of wind tunnel wall interference on two-dimensional airfoil by new porous wall model[C]//30th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, New Orleans, Louisiana, 2012 [Google Scholar]
  6. Maseland J E J, Laban M, Vander V H. Development of CFD-based interference models for the DNW-HST transonic wind-tunnel[C]//25th AIAA Aerodynamic Measurement Technology and Ground Testing Conference, San Francisco, 2006 [Google Scholar]
  7. Wright R H. Characteristics of a transonic test sectionwith various slot shapes in the Langley 8-foot high-speedtunnel[R]. NACA-RM-L51H10, 1951 [Google Scholar]
  8. Nelson W J. Effects of slot size and geometry on the flow in rectangular tunnels at Mach numbers up to 1.4[R]. NACA-RM-L53B16, 1953 [Google Scholar]
  9. Steinle F W. Development of the porous-slot geometry of the NWTC test section[C]//35th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno NV, 1997 [Google Scholar]
  10. Ju Lian, Bai Junqiang, Guo Bin, et al. Effect of geometry parameters on flow field quality in a transonic slotted wind tunnel[J]. Acta Aeronautica et AstronauticaSinica, 2016, 37 (5): 1440– 1453 [Article](in chinese) [Google Scholar]
  11. Cong Chenghua, Liao Daxiong, Wang Haifeng, et al. Numerical evaluation of aerodynamic design of slotted test section in 0.6 m closed circuittransonic wind tunnel[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2013, 31 (6): 752– 757 [Article](in chinese) [Google Scholar]
  12. Cong Chenghua, Peng Qiang, Wang Haifeng. Numerical simulation on characteristics of slotted test section of low supersonic field[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2010, 31 (12): 2302– 2308 [Article](in chinese) [Google Scholar]
  13. Yang Xiaochuan, Wang Yuntao, Hong Junwu, et al. Integrated numerical simulation research of high-speed section in transonic wind tunnel[J]. Advances in Aeronautical Science and Engineering, 2020, 11 (1): 92– 102 [Article](in chinese) [Google Scholar]
  14. Liao Daxiong, Chen Jiming, Zheng Juan, et al. General performance of 0.6 m continuous transonic wind tunnel[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2018, 32 (6): 74– 78 [Article](in chinese) [Google Scholar]
  15. Wu Shenghao, Pei Haitao, Chen Jiming, et al. Application of center-line prove in transonic wind tunnel[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2018, 33 (10): 2451– 2457 [Article](in chinese) [Google Scholar]
  16. Ren Zebin, Liao Daxiong, Zhang Guobiao. Aerodynamic design of the ejector of 2 m×2 m supersonic wind tunnel[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2014, 29 (10): 2288– 2293 [Article](in chinese) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.