Open Access
Issue
JNWPU
Volume 39, Number 3, June 2021
Page(s) 668 - 674
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/jnwpu/20213930668
Published online 09 August 2021
  1. Leishman G J. Principles of helicopter aerodynamics with CD extra[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006 [Google Scholar]
  2. Sahin M, Sankar L N, Chandrasekhara M S, et al. Dynamic stall alleviation using a deformable leading edge concept-a numerical study[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2003, 40 (1): 77– 85 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bain J J, Sankar L N, Prasad J V R, et al. Computational modeling of variable-droop leading edge in forward flight[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2009, 46 (2): 617– 626 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chandrasekhara M S. Optimum gurney flap height determination for "lost-lift" recovery in compressible dynamic stall control[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2010, 14 (8): 551– 556 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Johnson C, Barakos G. Optimising aspects of rotor blades in forward flight[C]//49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, 2011: 1194 [Google Scholar]
  6. Geissler W, Dietz G, Mai H, et al. Dynamic stall control investigations on a full size chord blade section[C]//30th European Rotorcraft Forum, Marseilles France, 2002 [Google Scholar]
  7. Yang Huiqiang, Xu Heyong, Ye Zhengyin. Study on the flow control of the dynamic stall using the co-flow jet[J]. Advances in Aeronautical Science and Engineering, 2018 (4): 16 [Article](in chinese) [Google Scholar]
  8. Xu Jianhua, Li Kai, Song Wenping, et al. influence of co-flow jet key parameters on airfoil aerodynamic performance at low Reynolds numbers[J]. Acta Aeroelastic et Astronautica Sinica, 2018, 39 (8): 88– 102 [Article](in chinese) [Google Scholar]
  9. Durrani N, Haider B A. Study of stall delay over a generic airfoil using synthetic jet actuator[C]//49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, 2011: 943 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bai Junqiang, Xin Liang, Liu Nan, et al. Numerical simulation of separation control for high Lift system using distributed zero-net mass flux jet[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2015, 32 (2): 188– 194 [Article](in chinese) [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhang P F, Yan B, Dai C F. Lift enhancement method by synthetic jet circulation control[J]. Science China Technological Sciences, 2012, 55 (9): 2585– 2592 [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hao Lishu, Qiao Zhide, Song Wenping. Experimentally studying effects of different layouts of vortex generator on controlling stall flow over airfoil[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2011, 29 (4): 524– 528 [Article](in chinese) [Google Scholar]
  13. Vu N A, Lee J W, Shu J I. Aerodynamic design optimization of helicopter rotor blades including airfoil shape for hover performance[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2013, 26 (1): 1– 8 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gumerov N A, Duraiswami R. Fast radial basis function interpolation via preconditioned Krylov iteration[J]. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 2007, 29 (5): 1876– 1899 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Stoll P, Gerlinger P, Brvggemann D, et al. Domain decomposition for an implicit LU-SGS scheme using overlapping grids[C]//13th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, 1997: 1896 [Google Scholar]
  16. Heffernan R M, Gaubert M. Structural and aerodynamic loads and performance measurements of an SA349/2 helicopter with an advanced geometry rotor[R]. NASA TM-88370, 1986: 1–58 [Google Scholar]
  17. Pomin H, Wagner S. Navier-Stokes analysis of helicopter rotor aerodynamics in hover and forward flight[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2002, 39 (5): 813– 821 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Chandrasekhara M S, Martin P B, Tung C. Compressible dynamic stall control using a variable droop leading edge airfoil[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2004, 41 (4): 862– 869 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.