Open Access
Volume 39, Number 6, December 2021
Page(s) 1274 - 1280
Published online 21 March 2022
  1. Chen Ke'an. Auditory perception and automatic recognition of ambient sound[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2014 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  2. Fidell Sanford. The schultz curve 25 years later: a research perspective[J]. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2003, 114(6): 3007 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hao YKang JWrtche H. Assessment of the masking effects of birdsong on the road traffic noise environment[J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2016, 140(2): 978–987 [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bolin K, Nilsson M E, Khan S. The potential of natural sounds to mask wind turbine noise[J]. Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 2010, 96(1): 131–137 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hongisto V, D OLIVA, Rekola L. Subjective and objective rating of spectrally different pseudorandom noises-implications for speech masking design[J]. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2015, 137(3): 1344–1355 [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lugten M, Karacaoglu M, White K, et al. Improving the soundscape quality of urban areas exposed to aircraft noise by adding moving water and vegetation[J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2018, 144(5): 2906–2917 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Maria R, ÖSten A, Mats E N, et al. Effects of sounds from water on perception of acoustic environments dominated by road-traffic noise[J]. Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 2013, 99(2): 218–225 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Suhara Y, Ikefuji D, Nakayama M, et al. A design of control signal in reducing discomfort of the dental treatment sound based on auditory masking[J]. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2013, 133(5): 3452 [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Zheng Yue. Human subjective annoyance and adjustment methods of substation noise[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2012 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  10. Li Zhengguang. Study on acoustical simulation and adjustment methods of subjective perception and objective law of electro-encephalogram variation under noise exposure[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2012 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  11. Di G Q, Chen X W, Song K, et al. Improvement of Zwicker's psychoacoustic annoyance model aiming at tonal noises[J]. Applied Acoustics London, 2016, 105: 164–170 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Di G Q, Li Z G, Zhang B J, et al. Adjustment on subjective annoyance of low frequency noise by adding additional sound[J]. Journal of Sound & Vibration, 2011, 330(23): 5707–5715 [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Li Z G, Di G Q. Reduce subjective annoyance from transformer noise by the method of sound adjustment and control[J]. Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 2016, 102(3): 452–461 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.