EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 40 / No 1 (February 2022) JNWPU, 40 1 (2022) 158-166 References
Open Access
Issue
JNWPU
Volume 40, Number 1, February 2022
Page(s) 158 - 166
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/jnwpu/20224010158
Published online 02 May 2022
  1. Wei Jianzheng, Tan Huifeng, Wang Weizhi, et al. New trends in inflatable reentry aeroshell[J]. Journal of Astronautics, 2013, 34(7) : 881–890. 10.3873/j.issn.1000-1328.2013.07.001 (in Chinese)] [Google Scholar]
  2. Clark I G, Hutchings A L, Tanner C L, et al. Supersonic inflatable aerodynamic decelerators for use on future robotic missions to mars[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2009, 46(2) : 340–352. [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Muppidi S, Tang C Y, Norman J V, et al. Aerodynamic analysis of next generation supersonic decelerators[C]//32nd AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Atlandta, USA, 2014 [Google Scholar]
  4. Wachi A, Takahashi R, Sakagami R, et al. Mars entry, descent, and landing by small THz spacecraft via membrane aeroshell[C]//AIAA SPACE and Astronautics Forum and Exposition, Orlando, USA, 2017 [Google Scholar]
  5. Reynier P, Evans D. Post-flight analysis of IRDT blackout during earth reentry[C]//39th Plasmadynamics and Lasers Conference, Seattle, USA, 2008 [Google Scholar]
  6. Yamada K, Nagata Y, Abe T, et al. Suborbital reentry demonstration of inflatable flare-type thin-membrane aeroshell using a sounding rocket[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2015, 52(1) : 275–284. [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gilbert C, Mazoue F, Ortega G, et al. New space application opportunities based on the inflatable reentry & descent technology[C]//AIAA/ICAS International Air and Space Symposium and Exposition: the Next 100 Years, Dayion, USA, 2003 [Google Scholar]
  8. Wu Jie, Zhang Zhang, Hou Anping, et al. Dynamic aerodynamic load and structural characteristics of inflatable reentry reducer[J]. Journal of Astronautics, 2020, 41(3) : 287–297 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  9. Wang Shuai, Yu Li, Zhang Zhang, et al. Study on the performance of inflatable decelerator with aerodynamic heating[J]. Spacecraft Recovery & Remote Sensing, 2019, 40(2) : 33–42 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhao Xiaoshun, Yu Li, Yang Xue. The prediction of aerodynamic performance of inflatable reentry vehicle at various speeds and attack angles[J]. Spacecraft Recovery & Remote Sensing, 2016, 37(5) : 27–36 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  11. Guo J H, Lin G P, Bu X Q, et al. Effect of static shape deformation on aerodynamics and aerothermodynamics of hypersonic inflatable aerodynamic decelerator[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2017, 136: 421–433. [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Takahashi Y, Ha D, Oshima N, et al. Aerodecelerator performance of flare-type membrane inflatable vehicle in suborbital reentry[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2017, 54(5) : 993–1004. [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Murman S M. Dynamic simulations of inflatable aerodynamic decelerator concepts[C]//20th AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conference and Seminar, Seattle, USA, 2009 [Google Scholar]
  14. Wang Bingbing, Han Yufeng, Fan Yu, et al. Effect of transport properties of high temperature air on boundary layer stability and transition prediction[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2017, 32(1) : 188–195 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  15. Takahashi Y, Yamada K. Aerodynamic heating of inflatable aeroshell in orbital reentry[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2018, 152(1) : 437–448 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Esch D D, Pike R W, Engel C D, et al. Stagnation region heating of a phenolic-nylon ablator during return from planetary missions[R]. NASA CR-112026, 1971 [Google Scholar]
  17. Blottner F G, Johnson M, Ellis M. Chemically reaction viscous flow program for multicomponent gas mixture[R]. RR 70-754, 1972 [Google Scholar]
  18. Wilke C R. A viscosity equation for gas mixturesf[J]. Journal of Chemical Physics, 1950, 18(4) : 517–519. [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gupta R N, Lee K P, Thompson R A, et al. Calculations and curve fits of thermodynamic and transport properties for equilibrium air to 30 000 K[R]. NASA RP-1260, 1991 [Google Scholar]
  20. Pugazenthi R S, Krishnan U. Design and performance analysis of a supersonic diffuser for plasma wind tunnel[C]//46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, USA, 2008 [Google Scholar]
  21. Kim K H, Rho O H, Park C. Navier-Stokes computation of flows in arc heaters[J]. Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer, 2012, 14(2) : 250–258 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kim K H, Kim C, Rho O H. Methods for the accurate computations of hypersonic flows: shock-aligned grid technique[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2001, 174(1) : 81–119. [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Manabu M, Takahashi Y, Obuyuki O, et al. Aerodynamic heating prediction of an inflatable reentry vehicle in a hypersonic wind tunnel[C]//55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Grapevine, USA, 2017 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hannemann K, Schramm J M, Karl S, et al. Cylinder shock layer density profiles measured in high enthalpy flows in HEG[R]. AIAA-2002-2913 [Google Scholar]
  25. Liao Dongjun, Liu Sen, Jian Hexiang, et al. Review of research on shock standoff distance for hypersonic sphere[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2015, 29(6) : 1–7 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  26. Inouye M. Shock standoff distance for equilibrium flow around hemispheres obtained from numerical calculations[J]. AIAA Journal, 1965, 3(1) : 172–173 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Cao Xu, Huang Mingxing, Ding Hong, et al. Thermal shock test of flexible thermal protection system for inflatable reentry and descent technology[J]. Manned Spaceflight, 2018, 24(1): 26–33 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.