Open Access
Volume 40, Number 6, December 2022
Page(s) 1366 - 1374
Published online 10 February 2023
  1. CHOWDHURY S S. A study on lateral earth pressure against strutted retaining wall in cohesionless soil deposit[J]. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 13(2): 122–138 [Google Scholar]
  2. AHMADABADI M, GHANBARI A. New procedure for active earth pressure calculation in retaining walls with reinforced cohesive-frictional backfill[J]. Geotextiles & Geomembranes, 2009, 27(6): 456–463. [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. VAHEDIFARD F, LESHCHINSKY B A, MORTEZAEI K, et al. Active earth pressures for unsaturated retaining structures[J]. Journal of Geotechnical & Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2015, 141(11): 04015048. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  4. YOO C, LEE D. Deep excavation-induced ground surface movement characteristic a numerical investigation[J]. Computers & Geotechnics, 2008, 35(2): 231–252. [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. HSIUNG B C B. A case study on the behaviour of a deep excavation in sand[J]. Computers & Geotechnics, 2009, 36(4): 665–675. [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. BILGIN O. Numerical studies of anchored sheet pile wall behavior constructed in cut and fill conditions[J]. Computers & Geotechnics, 2010, 37(3): 399–407. [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. LI L. Behavior of tire-geogrid-reinforced retaining wall system under dynamic vehicle load[J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2020, 20(4): 04020017. [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. WANG Yimin, YAN Cen, YU Heng, et al. Experimental study on stress characteristics of geogrid reinforced widening embankment soil under static load[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(suppl 1): 311–317. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  9. WANG Jiaquan, XU Liangjie, HUANG Shibin, et al. Analysis of bearing capacity of geogrid reinforced abutment retaining wall under dynamic load[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(11): 4220–4228. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  10. SRBULOV M. Active earth pressure in cohesive soils with an inclined ground surface[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2010, 37: 171–177 [Google Scholar]
  11. LEE I K, HERRINGTON J R. A theoretical study of the pressure acting on a rigid wall by sloping earth or rock fill[J]. Geotechnique, 1972, 22(1): 1–27. [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. BATHURST R, ALLEN T, WALTERS D. Reinforcement loads in geosynthetic walls and the case for a new working stress design method[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2005, 23(4): 287–322. [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. SILVESTRI V. Active earth pressure in cohesive soils with an inclined ground surface[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2001, 37(1): 171–177 [Google Scholar]
  14. CHENG Y M. Seismic lateral earth pressure coefficients for c-φ soils by slip line method[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2003, 30(8): 661–670. [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. LIU F Q, WANG J H, ZHANG L L. Axi-symmetric active earth pressure obtained by the slip line method with a general tangential stress coefficient[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2009, 36(1/2): 352–358. [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. LI Lihua, LI Hang, XIAO Henglin, et al. Numerical simulation analysis of compaction stress of reinforced earth retaining wall[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2020, 39(suppl 1): 3130–3138. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  17. LI Lihua, SHI Anning, XIAO Henglin, et al. Static load model test and mechanical properties of reinforced earth retaining wall[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(12): 4360–4368. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  18. FUMIO T, SHINYA N, CHINGCHUANG H., et al. Strength anisotropy and shear band direction in plane strain tests of sand[J]. Soils and Foundations, 1990, 30(1): 35–54 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. TATSUOKA F, HAIBARA O. Shear resistance between sand and smooth or lubricated surfaces[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2008, 25(1): 89–98. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  20. RUIKEN A. Zum spannungs-dehnungsverhalten des verbundbaustoffs geogitterbewehrter boden[D]. Nordrhein-Westfalen: Rheinisch-Westfälischen Technischen Hochschule Aachen, 2013 [Google Scholar]
  21. JACOBS F, RUIKEN A, ZIEGLER M. Investigation of kinematic behavior and earth pressure development of geogrid reinforced soil walls[J]. Transportation Geotechnics, 2016, 8: 57–68. [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. GAO Shuiqin. Study on performance of reinforced earth retaining wall on soft soil foundation considering time effect[D]. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology, 2011 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  23. BATHURST R J, BENJAMIN D J. Preliminary assessment of sidewall friction on large-scale wall models in the RMC test facility//The application of polymeric reinforcement in soil retaining structures[M]. Dordrecht: Springer, 1988 [Google Scholar]
  24. JARRETT P M, MCGOWN A. Reinforced soil wall analysis and behaviour[M]. Netherlands: Springer, 1988 [Google Scholar]
  25. JAYASREE P K, RAJAGOPAL K, GNANENDRAN C T. Influence of sidewall friction on the results of small-scale laboratory model tests: numerical assessment[J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2012, 12(2): 119–126. [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. XU Riqing, GONG Ci, WEI Gang, et al. Earth pressure theory of rigid retaining wall considering translational displacement effect[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Engineering Edition, 2005, 39(1): 119–122. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  27. CHEN Lin. Study on calculation method of active earth pressure of retaining wall under different displacement modes[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2010 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  28. LU Kunlin, YANG Yang. Approximate calculation method of active earth pressure considering displacement effect[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2009(2): 553–557. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.