EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 41 / No 1 (February 2023) JNWPU, 41 1 (2023) 39-46 References
Open Access
Issue
JNWPU
Volume 41, Number 1, February 2023
Page(s) 39 - 46
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/jnwpu/20234110039
Published online 02 June 2023
  1. CAO Y, WU Z, SU Y, etal. Aircraft flight characteristics in icing conditions[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2015, 74: 62–80 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. LYNCH F T, KHODADOUST A. Effects of ice accretions on aircraft aerodynamics[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2001, 37(8): 669–767 [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. BRAGG M B, BROEREN A P, BLUMENTHAL L A. Iced-airfoil aerodynamics[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2005, 41(5): 323–362 [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. ZHOU Feng, FENG Lijuan, XU Chaojun, etal. Determination and verification of critical ice shape for the certification of civil aircraft[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2016, 30(2): 8–13 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  5. KIM H, BRAGG M. Effects of leading-edge ice accretion geometry on airfoil performance[C]//17th Applied Aerodynamics Conference, 1999: 3150 [Google Scholar]
  6. BUSCH G T, BROEREN A P, BRAGG M B. Aerodynamic simulation of a horn-ice accretion on a subscale model[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2008, 45(2): 604–613 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. MANSHADI M D, ESFEH M K. Experimental investigation of flowfield over an iced aerofoil[J]. The Aeronautical Journal, 2016, 120(1227): 735–756 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. RAJ L P, YEE K, MYONG R S. Sensitivity of ice accretion and aerodynamic performance degradation to critical physical and modeling parameters affecting airfoil icing[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2020, 98: 105659 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. YUAN Kungang, CAO Yihua. Effect of ice geometry to airfoil performance using neural networks prediction[J]. Journals of Beijing University of Aerodynamics and Astronautics, 20088): 900–903 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  10. CAO Y, YUAN K, LI G. Effects of ice geometry on airfoil performance using neural networks prediction[J]. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, 2011, 83(5): 266–274 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  11. ZHOU Li, XU Haojun, YANG Zhe, etal. Numerical simulation ofridgeice shapes on airfoil aerodynamics[J]. Flight Dynamics, 2012, 30(6): 489–493 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  12. HUANG Ranran, LI Dong, LIU Teng, etal. The effect of ice accretion roughness on airfoil stall aerodynamics[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2021, 39(1): 59–65 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  13. ZHENG Chengyi, DONG Qiaotian, ZHAO Binbin, etal. Aerodynamic numerical simulation of characteristic parameters of simplified horn ice at different angles of attack and airfoils[J]. Journal of Tongji University, 2021, 49(10): 1443–1450 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  14. MARONGIU C, VITAGLIANO P L, ZANAZZI G, etal. Aerodynamic analysis of an iced airfoil at medium/high Reynolds number[J]. AIAA Journal, 2008, 46(10): 2469–2478 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. STEBBINS S J, LOTH E, BROEREN A P, etal. Review of computational methods for aerodynamic analysis of iced lifting surfaces[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2019, 111: 100583 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. POURYOUSSEFI S G, MIRZAEI M, NAZEMI M M, etal. Experimental study of ice accretion effects on aerodynamic performance of an NACA 23012 airfoil[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2016, 29(3): 585–595 [Google Scholar]
  17. LEE S, BRAGG M B. Investigation of factors affecting iced-airfoil aerodynamics[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2003, 40(3): 499–508 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. BRAGG M B, KHODADOUST A, SPRING S A. Measurements in a leading-edge separation bubble due to a simulated airfoil ice accretion[J]. AIAA Journal, 1992, 30(6): 1462–1467 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. MIRZAEI M, ARDEKANI M A, DOOSTTALAB M. Numerical and experimental study of flow field characteristics of an iced airfoil[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2009, 13(6): 267–276 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.