Open Access
Issue
JNWPU
Volume 41, Number 3, June 2023
Page(s) 471 - 479
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/jnwpu/20234130471
Published online 01 August 2023
  1. HE Boling, GE Dongyun, MO Yuming, et al. Tensile tests and strength estimation for double-lap single-bolt joints in T800 carbon fiber reinforced composites[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2016, 33(7): 1540–1552 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  2. ZHAO Libin, XU Jifeng. Analysis method of connection structure of advanced composite materials[M]. Beijing: Beihang University Press, 2015: 75–76 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  3. AKTAS A, DIRIKOLU M H. The effect of stacking sequence of carbon epoxy composite laminates on pinned-joint strength[J]. Composite Structures, 2003, 62(1): 107–111 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. CAO Y, ZUO D, ZHAO Y, et al. Experimental investigation on bearing behavior and failure mechanism of double-lap thin-ply composite bolted joints[J]. Composite Structures, 2021, 261: 113565 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. CAO Yuejie, WEI Lingfeng, ZHANG Minghao, et al. Experimental study on progressive failure mechanism of thin-laminate bolted joints[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2021, 42(12): 311–326 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  6. ALUKO O, WHITWORTH H A. Analysis of stress distribution around pin loaded holes in orthotropic plates[J]. Composite Structures, 2008, 86(4): 308–313 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. YANG Xiankun, ZHENG Xitao, CHENG Linan, et al. An engineering approach to predict the bearing strength of single-bolted double-lapped joints in composite laminate[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2012, 29(6): 225–229 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  8. HUANG Heyuan, ZHAO Meiying, WAN Xiaopeng, et al. A composite bolted joints non-linear stiffness model and its application[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2018, 36(1): 66–73 [Article] (in Chinese) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  9. IÇTEN B M, KARAKUZU R. Progressive failure analysis of pin-loaded carbon-epoxy woven composite plates[J]. Composites Science and Technology, 2002, 62(9): 1259–1271 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. IÇTEN B M, KARAKUZU R, TOYGAR M E. Failure analysis of woven kevlar fiber reinforced epoxy composites pinned joints[J]. Composite Structures, 2006, 73(4): 443–450 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. JOSEPH A P, DAVIDSON P, WAAS A M. Progressive damage and failure analysis of single lap shear and double lap shear bolted joints[J]. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing. 2018, 113: 264–274 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. CHEN Pengfei, ZHAO Meiying, MU Penggang, et al. Improving method for analyzing strength of composite material bolted joint[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2008, 26(2): 229–233 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  13. LIU Xiangdong, LI Yazhi, LI Biao, et al. On numerical modeling and tensile strength of bolted composite joints[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2013, 31(6): 878–883 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  14. DU A, LIU Y, XIN H, et al. Progressive damage analysis of PFRP double-lap bolted joints using explicit finite element method[J]. Composite Structures, 2016, 152: 860–869 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. SHAN M, LIU F, FANG Z, et al. A bi-material property based FE modelling method for progressive damage analyses of composite double-lap bolted joints[J]. Results in Physics, 2018, 11: 674–683 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. ABD-ELHADY A A, MUBARAKI M A, SALLAM H E M. Progressive failure prediction of pinned joint in quasi-isotropic laminates used in pipelines[J]. Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures, 2018, 15(6): 96 [Google Scholar]
  17. ZHOU S, YANG C, TIAN K, et al. Progressive failure modelling of double-lap of composite bolted joints based on Puck's criterion[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2018, 206: 233–249 [Google Scholar]
  18. FIORE V, CALABRESE L, SCALICI T, et al. Bearing strength and failure behavior of pinned hybrid glass-flax composite laminates[J]. Polymer Testing, 2018, 69: 310–319 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. TUO Hongliang, MA Xiaoping, LU Zhixian. Failure analysis of composite pinned joints based on continuum damage mechanics[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2018, 36(5): 848–855 [Article] (in Chinese) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  20. TANG Yuling, CHEN Hao, ZHOU Zhengong, et al. Bearing strength of carbon/carbon braided composites double shear joint[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2020, 56(18): 51–60 [Article] (in Chinese) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. ZHONG Maoping, MAO Chunjian, ZHANG Xia. Effect of clearance and interference on static strength of single-bolt, double-lap composite bolted joints[J]. Journal of Materials Science & Engineering, 2021, 39(5): 750–756 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  22. GU Jiefei. Research on failure criteria for aircraft structural materials[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2018 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  23. American Society for Testing and Materials. Standard test method for bearing response of polymer matrix composite laminates[S]. ASTM D5961/D5961M-17, 2017 [Google Scholar]
  24. PIERRON F, CERISIER F, GREDIAC M. A numerical and experimental study of woven composite pin-joints[J]. Journal of Composite Materials, 2000, 34(12): 1028–1054 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. HASHIN Z, ROTEM A. A fatigue failure criterion for fiber reinforced materials[J]. Journal of Composite Materials, 1973, 7(4): 448–464 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. ZHANG Jie. Some understanding of pavement design criterion for composite material[J]. Science and Technology Innovation Herald, 2013(14): 57–58 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.