Open Access
Volume 41, Number 4, August 2023
Page(s) 654 - 660
Published online 08 December 2023
  1. GUSKI R, FELSCHER-SUHR U, SCHUEMER R. The concept of noise annoyance: how international experts see it[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1999, 223(4): 513–527 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. PETER L. Noise in cities: urban and transport planning determinants and health in cities: a framework[C]//Integrating Human Health into Urban and Transport Planning, Switzerland, 2018: 443–481 [Google Scholar]
  3. YAN Liang, CHEN Ke'an. Sound quality and noise impact assessment[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment, 2013, 35(6): 24–26 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  4. HAN Guanghua, FAN Bo. The effect of semantic difference of likert-type questionaires on scientific measurements[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2017, 34(20): 6–11 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  5. FIELDS J M, JONG R G D, GJESTLAND T, et al. Standardized general-purpose noise reaction questions for community noise surveys: research and a recommendation[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2001, 242(4): 641–679 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. YAN Liang. Evaluation and characterization of annoyance of combined noise[D]. Xi'an: Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2011 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  7. DESCOVICH K A, WATHAN J, LEACH M C, et al. Facial expression: an under-utilised tool for the assessment of welfare in mammals[J]. ALTEX-Alternatives to Animal Experi-mentation, 2017, 34(3): 409–429 [Google Scholar]
  8. SWANSON G E, TOMKINS S S, KARON B P. Affect, imagery, consciousness: the positive affects[J]. American Sociological Review, 1963, 28(4): 661 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. NAKAJIMA K, MINAMI T, NAKAUCHI S. Interaction between facial expression and color[J]. Scientific Reorts, 2017, 7: 41019 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. LEACH M C, COULTER C A, RICHARDSON C A, et al. Are we looking in the wrong place? Implications for behavioural-based pain assessment in rabbits(Oryctolagus cuniculi) and beyond?[J]. Plos One, 2011, 6(3): e13347 [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. KRISTA M M, AMY L M, EMANUELA D C, et al. Conceptual and methodological issues relating to pain assessment in mammals: The development and utilisation of pain facial expression scales[J]. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 2019, 217: 1–15 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. SHI Lin. A review of several issues in emotional research[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2000, 8(1): 63–68 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  13. 闫靓, 周卉婷, 范豪炜, 等. 声音诱发情绪反应测试与评价系统[简称: 声音情绪测评]V1.0: 中国, 2022SR0398977[P]. 2021-09-09 [Google Scholar]
  14. ZHONG Chen, LI Guoqi, LU Hongyao. Research on soundscape theory and sound classification[J]. Radio & TV Broadcast Engineering, 2003, 30(12): 61–64 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  15. WEI Wei. Discussion on emotional expression of network emoticons[J]. Public Communication of Science & Technology, 2014, 6(13): 24–26 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  16. BAI Lu, MA Hui, HUANG Yuxia, et al. The development of native chinses affective picture system-a pretest in 46 college students[J]. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 2005, 19(11): 719–722 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  17. American National Standards Institute, Acoustical Society of America. Criteria for Evaluating Room Noise[S]. ANSI/ASA S12.2-2019 [Google Scholar]
  18. EKMAN P, LEVENSON R, FRIESEN W. Autonomic nervous system activity distinguishes among emotions[J]. Science, 1983, 221(4616): 1208–1210 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. SHAO Z, LIU Z, CAI J, et al. JAA-Net: Joint facial action unit detection and face alignment via adaptive attention[J]. International Journal of Computer Vision, 2021, 129(2): 321–340 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. LI W, ABTAHI F, ZHU Z, et al. EAC-Net: deep nets with enhancing and cropping for facial action unit detection[J]. IEEE Trans on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2018, 40(11): 2583–2596 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.