Open Access
Volume 41, Number 6, Decembre 2023
Page(s) 1162 - 1169
Published online 26 February 2024
  1. LI Jianlin, LI Guanghui, GUO Lijun, et al. Overview and prospect of hydrogen energy application technology under the 14th five year plan[J]. Electrotechnical Application, 2021, 40(6): 10–16 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  2. MA Jian, LIU Xiaodong, CHEN Yisong, et al. Current status and countermeasures for China's new energy automobile industry and technology development[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2018, 31(8): 1–19 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  3. DJILALI N. Computational modelling of polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) fuel cells: challenges and opportunities[J]. Energy, 2006, 32(4): 269–280 [Google Scholar]
  4. ALI A S, EBRAHIM A, ELNAZ Z, et al. Three-dimensional simulation of different flow fields of proton exchange membrane fuel cell using a multi-phase coupled model with cooling channel[J]. Energy, 2021, 234: 121247. [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. TURKMEN A C, CELIK C. The effect of different gas diffusion layer porosity on proton exchange membrane fuel cells[J]. Fuel, 2018, 222: 465–474. [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. FARCAS A C. A Proposed control technique for water management in proton exchange membrane fuel cells[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2013, 2776: 145–152 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. FAN Linhao, ZHANG Guobin, JIAO Kui. Investigations on PEMFC performance under high current density and low humidification[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2019, 40(4): 870–876 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  8. XING L, LIU X T, ALAJE T, et al. A two-phase flow and non-isothermal agglomerate model for a proton exchange membrane(PEM) fuel cell[J]. Energy, 2014, 73: 618–634. [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. LU Jiabin, SHEN Xinming, CHEN Ming, et al. Synergistic effect of cathode humidity and current density on performance of PEMFC[J]. Chinese Journal of Power Sources, 2021, 45(8): 1018–1022 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  10. JIANG Yang, JIAO Kui. Modeling and analysis of water and heat transfer characteristics of proton exchange membrane fuel cell[J]. Journal of Thermal Science and Technology, 2019, 18(3): 200–205 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  11. LU J B, WEI G H, ZHU F J, et al. Pressure effect on the PEMFC performance[J]. Fuel Cells, 2019, 19(3): 211–220 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. SHEN J, ZENG L P, TU Z K, et al. Numerical investigation of temperature distribution of proton exchange membrane fuel cells at high current density[J]. Journal of Porous Media, 2019, 22(7): 813–829. [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. LIU Y F, GAO J H, PEI P C, et al. Effects of dynamic changes in inlet temperature on proton exchange membrane fuel cell[J]. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 2019, 11(4): 044302. [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. YANG T F, SHEU B H, GHALAMBAZ M, et al. Effects of operating parameters and load mode on dynamic cell performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cell[J]. International Journal of Energy Research, 2020, 45(2): 2474–2487 [Google Scholar]
  15. WEI G H, LU J B, ZHANG Q L, et al. Analyze the effects of flow mode and humidity on PEMFC performance by equivalent membrane conductivity[J]. International Journal of Energy Research, 2019, 43(9): 4592–4605. [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. RAJ A, SHAMIM T. Investigation of the effect of multidimensionality in PEM fuel cells[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2014, 86: 443–452. [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. WANG Shixue, QI He, LI Hua. Influence on water management using new inlet gas humidification design for PEFC[J]. Journal of Thermal Science and Technology, 2013, 12(4): 354–359 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  18. GAO Qiang, ZHANG Shuanyang, XU Hongtao, et al. Simulation study on the effect of fin structure on the performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cell[J]. Journal of Engineering for Thermal Energy and Power, 2020, 35(7): 215–222 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  19. ZHANG G B, JIAO K. Three-dimensional multi-phase simulation of PEMFC at high current density utilizing eulerian-eulerian model and two-fluid model[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2018, 176: 409–421 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. HU G L, LI G N, ZHENG Y Q, et al. Optimization and parametric analysis of PEMFC based on an agglomerate model for catalyst layer[J]. Journal of the Energy Institute, 2014, 87(2): 163–174. [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. LIU H J. Research on liquid water distribution in PEMFC cathode porous media[J]. International Journal of Electrochemical Science, 2020, 15(7): 6717–6736. [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. XING L, CAI Q, LIU X T, et al. Anode partial flooding modelling of proton exchange membrane fuel cells: optimization of electrode properties and channel geometries[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2016, 146: 88–103 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.