Open Access
Issue
JNWPU
Volume 42, Number 4, August 2024
Page(s) 707 - 715
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/jnwpu/20244240707
Published online 08 October 2024
  1. CARAC. Quality requirements of flow fields for low and high speed wind tunnel[S]. GJB1179A-2012 [Google Scholar]
  2. YUN Qilin. Experimental aerodynamics[M]. Beijing: Defense Industry Press, 1991: 103–122 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  3. CHEN Dehua, LIU Dawei. Correction and use of high speed wind tunnel test data[M]. Beijing: Defense Industry Press, 2018: 53–64 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  4. CHEN Dehua, WANG Ruibo, LIU Guangyuan, et al. The test and flow field calibration of 2.4 m transonic wind tunnel slotted test section[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2013, 27(4): 66–70 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  5. MAX A A, ALAN R B. Calibration of the 11-By 11-Foot transonic wind tunnel at the NASA AMES research center[R]. AIAA-2005-4277, 2005 [Google Scholar]
  6. JACKON F M. Calibration of the AEDC-PWT 16-Foot transonic tunnel aerodynamic test section at various reynolds numbers[R]. AEDC-TR-78-60, 1978 [Google Scholar]
  7. LI Feng, GAO Chao, ZHANG Zhengke, et al. The test of characteristics of flow area and calibration model in NF-6 pressurized continuous transonic wind tunnel[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2013, 27(1): 61–64 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  8. ALLEN ARRINGTON E. Calibration of the NASA Glenn 8-by 6-Foot supersonic wind tunnel(1996 and 1997 tests)[R]. NASA/CR-2012-217270, 2012 [Google Scholar]
  9. ALLEN ARRINGTON E. Subsonic calibration of the NASA Glenn research center 10- by 10-foot supersonic wind tunnel(1998 test)[R]. AIAA-2000-2448, 2000 [Google Scholar]
  10. QUEST J. ETW shakedown tests and preliminary calibration results European transonic wind tunnel[R]. AIAA-1994-31063, 1994 [Google Scholar]
  11. KOHZAI M, UENO M, SHIOHARA T, et al. Calibration of the test section Mach number in the JAXA 2 m×2 m transonic wind tunnel[R]. AIAA-2008-0848, 2008 [Google Scholar]
  12. HUDGINS M, HERGERT D. Methodology and results from a recent calibration of the Boeing transonic wind tunnel[C]//Proceedings of the 41st AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, 2005 [Google Scholar]
  13. AMAYA M A, FLACH R, L'ESPERANCE A. Initial testing of the ames unitary short static pipe[C]//Proceedings of the 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 2017 [Google Scholar]
  14. DENG Haijun, XIONG Bo, LUO Xinfu, et al. Design and test of short centerline probe in continuous transonic wind tunnel.[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2022, 37(6): 1171–1180 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  15. DENG Haijun, XIONG Bo, LUO Xinfu, et al. Influence of mach number of core flow measured by short centerline probe in transonic wind tunnel[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, 2022, 54(2): 225–232 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  16. DENG Haijun, XIONG Bo, LUO Xinfu, et al. A preliminary study on static pressure probe mobile measurement method for flow field in transonic wind tunnel[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2021, 39(4): 786–793. [Article] (in Chinese) [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  17. WU Shenghao, FEI Haitao, CHEN Jiming, et al. Application of center-line probe in transonic wind tunnel[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2018, 33(10): 2451–2457 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.