EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 42 / No 4 (August 2024) JNWPU, 42 4 (2024) 753-763 References
Open Access
Issue
JNWPU
Volume 42, Number 4, August 2024
Page(s) 753 - 763
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/jnwpu/20244240753
Published online 08 October 2024
  1. WANG Haiwang, SHI Hongquang, ZHAO Xiaozhe. A summary of target intent identification methods[C]//2020 China System Simulation and Virtual Reality Technology Forum, Beijing, 2020: 3 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  2. GONG Cheng, YI Junbo, CAI Lingong, et al. Intelligent recognition method of target intention based on knowledge graph embeddeed learning[J]. Ship Electronic Engineering, 2023, 43(1): 32–35. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  3. ZHANG Su, CHENG Qiyue, XIE Yao, et al. A method of inference intention with uncertain aerial information[J]. Journal of Air Force Engineering University, 2008(3): 50–53. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  4. CHEN HAO, REN Qinglong, HUA Yi, et al. Fuzzy neural network based tactical intention recognition for sea targets[J]. System Engineering and Electronics, 2016, 38(8): 1847–1853 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  5. SUN Yuelin, BAO Lei. Study on recognition technique of targets' tactical intentions in sea batlefield based on D-S evidence theory[J]. Ship Electronic Engineering, 2012, 32(5): 48–51. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  6. ZHANG Yu, DENG Xinyang, LI Mingda, et al. Air target intention recognition based on evidence-network causal analysis[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2022, 43(suppl): 143–156 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  7. XIA Xi. The study of target intention assessment method based on the template-matching[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2006 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  8. XU Jianping, ZHANG Lifan, HAN Deqiang. Air target intention recognition based on fuzzy inference[J]. Command Information System and Technology, 2020, 11(3): 44–48 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  9. GENG Zhenyu, ZHANG Jiankang. Research on air target combat intention inference based on bayesian networks[J]. Modern Defence Technology, 2008, 36(6): 40–44. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  10. WANG Hongran. Research on air target intention recognition based on multi-entities bayesian networks[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2011 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  11. YU Zhenxiang, HU Xiaoxuan, XIA Wei. Foe intention inference in air combat based on fuzzy dynamic Bayesian network[J]. Journal of Hefei University of Technology, 2013, 36(10): 1210–1216. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  12. ZHANG W, YANG F, LIANG Y. A Bayesian framework for joint target tracking, classification, and intent inference[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 66148–66156. [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. WANG Haibin, GUAN Xin, YI Xiao, et al. An intention recognition method based on fuzzy belief-rule-base[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2023, 45(3): 941–948 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  14. XU Yibo, YU Qinghua, WANG Yanjuan, et al. Ground target recognition and damage assessment of patrol missiles based on multi-source information fusion[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2023, 36(2): 511–521 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  15. FUYUAN X, WITOLD P. Negation of the quantum mass function for multisource quantum information fusion with its application to pattern classification[J]. IEEE Trans on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2022, 45(2): 2054–2070 [Google Scholar]
  16. HU Zhiyong, LIU Huali, GONG Shujun, et al. Target intention recognition based on random forest[J]. Modern Electronic Technology, 2022, 45(19): 1–8 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  17. YANG Yutian, YANG Jie, LI Jianguo. Research on air target tactical intention recognition based on EMEBN[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2022, 47(5): 163–170. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  18. LIU Shitong. Research and application of air target intent recognition technology based on machine learning[D]. Chengdu: University of Electronic Science and Technology, 2022 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  19. WU Guangyu, SHI Hongquan, QIU Chuchu. Intention recognition method of air target based on SSA-SVM[J]. Ship Electronic Engineering, 2022, 42(3): 29–34. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  20. OU Wei, LIU Shaojun, HE Xiaoyuan, et al. Study on the intelligent recognition model of enemy target's tactical intention on battlefield[J]. Computer Simulation, 2017, 34(9): 10–14. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  21. JIANG Jiayun, SUN Youchao, YAN Chuanqi. Pilot manipulation intention recognition based on GASVM-HMM algorithms[J]. Aeronautical Computing Technique, 2023, 53(1): 43–47 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  22. ZHOU Wangwang, YAO Peiyang, ZHANG Jieyong, et al. Combat intention recognition for aerial targets based on deep neiral network[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2018, 39(11): 200–208 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  23. QIAN Zhao, LIU Qin, LU Yao, et al. Identification of target's combat intention based on long short term memory network[J]. Journal of Terahertz Science and Electronic Information Technology, 2022, 20(11): 1156–1162. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  24. WU Nanfang. Research on cluster intention recogniton method based on reccurent neural network[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2019 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  25. TENG Fei, XING Qianli, WANG Longfei, et al. A model for aerial target intention recognition based on TCN[C]//2022 China Automation Conference, Xiamen, 2022: 8 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  26. LI Ying, WU Junsheng, LI Weigang, et al. A hierarchical aggregation model for identifying operational intent[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2023, 41(2): 400–408. [Article] (in Chinese) [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  27. SINGH S, MAHMOOD A. The NLP Cookbook: modern recipes for transformer based deep learning architectures[J]. IEEE Access, 2021, 9: 68675–68702. [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. OU Wei, LIU Shaojun, HE Xiaoyuan, et al. Tactical intention recognition algorithm based on encoded temporal features[J]. Command Control and Simulation, 2016, 38(6): 36–41 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  29. LU Guangyu, DING Yingying. Study on intention recognition to foe of underwater platform[J]. Command Control and Simulation, 2012, 34(6): 100–102 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  30. MA Yutang, SUN Peng, ZHANG Jieyong, et al. Air group intention recognition method under imbalance samples[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(12): 3747–3755 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  31. LIU Zhuandong, CHEN Mou, WU Qingxian, et al. Prediction of unmanned aerial vehicle target intention under incomplete information[J]. Scientia Sinica Informationis, 2020, 50(5): 704–717 (in Chinese) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. LI Zhanwu, CHANG Yizhe, YANG Haiyan, et al. Situation assessment method for cooperative air combat based on dynamic combat power field[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2015, 27(7): 1584–1590 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  33. OU Aihui, ZHU Ziqian. A Method of threat assessment based on MADM and results of situation assessment in air to air combat[J]. Fire Control Radar Technology, 2006(2): 64–67 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  34. XI Zhifei, XU An, KOU Yingxin, et al. Target threat assessment in air combat based on PCA-MPSO-ELM algorithm[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2020, 41(9): 216–231 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  35. DING Peng, SONG Yafei. A cost-sensitive method for aerial target intention recognition[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(24): 176–191 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  36. TENG Fei, LIU Shu, SONG Yafei. BiLSTM-Attention: an air target tactical intention recognition model[J]. Aero Weaponry, 2021, 28(5): 24–32 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  37. TENG F, SONG Y F, GUO X P. Attention-TCN-BiGRU: an air target combat intention recognition model[J]. Mathematics, 2021, 9(19): 2412 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. XUE J, ZHU J, XIAO J, et al. Panoramic convolutional long short-term memory networks for combat intension recognition of aerial targets[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 183312–183323 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.