Open Access
Issue
JNWPU
Volume 43, Number 2, April 2025
Page(s) 345 - 356
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/jnwpu/20254320345
Published online 04 June 2025
  1. SUN Guoxin, WEN Qiuqiu, XU Zhiqiang, et al. Impact time control using biased proportional navigation for missiles with varying velocity[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2020, 33(3): 956–964. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  2. KIM B S, LEE J G, HAN H S. Biased PNG law for impact with angular constraint[J]. IEEE Trans on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 1998, 34(1): 277–288. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  3. MA Shuai, WANG Xugang, WANG Zhongyuan, et al. BPNG law with arbitrary initial lead angle and terminal impact angle constraint and time-to-go estimation[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2019, 40(1): 68–78. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  4. ZHANG Gang, WANG Yunming. The research of guidance model based on the extended proportional guidance law[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2016, 41(2): 82–84 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  5. WANG Liguang, YU Changqing, ZHAO Jiong, et al. Improved proportion navigation based on iterative optimization of prediction model[J]. Flight Dynamics, 2021, 39(1): 66–70 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  6. LIU Chang, FAN Shipeng, WANG Jiang, et al. BP neural network-based adaptive biased proportional navigation guidance law[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2022, 43(11): 2798–2809 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  7. SUN J, LIU C, YE Q. Robust differential game guidance laws design for uncertain interceptor-target engagement via adaptive dynamic programming[J]. International Journal of Control, 2017, 90(5): 990–1004. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  8. SUN Lei, FU Bing, WAN Shizheng, et al. Differential game guidance law based on adaptive dynamicprogramming for the interception of hypersonie targets[J]. Advances in Aeronautical Science and Engineering, 2020, 11(6): 796–802 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  9. HUA Wenhua, ZHANG Yongjun, ZHANG Jinpeng, et al. Differential game guidance law for double missiles with cooperative intercept angle[J]. Journal of Chinese Inertial Technology, 2016, 24(6): 838–844 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  10. YU Jianglong, DONG Xiwang, LI Qingdong, et al. Cooperative differential game guidance method for intercepting maneuvering target[J]. Journal of Command and Control, 2020, 6(3): 217–222 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  11. GUELMAN M, SHINAR J. Optimal guidance law in the plane[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 1984, 7(4): 471–476 [Google Scholar]
  12. SUN Jingliang, LIU Chunsheng. An overview on the adaptive dynamic programming based missile guidance law[J]. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2017, 43(7): 1101–1113 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  13. AAMIR M. Nonlinear receding horizon sub-optimal guidance law for the minimum interception time problem[J]. Control Engineering Practice, 2001, 9(1): 107–116 [Google Scholar]
  14. VINCENT T L, MORGAN R W. Guidance against maneuvering targets using Lyapunov optimizing feedback control[C]//Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Anchorage, 2002: 215–220 [Google Scholar]
  15. MOON J, KIM K, KIM Y. Design of missile guidance law via variable structure control[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2001, 24(4): 659–664 [Google Scholar]
  16. ZHANG Yanxia, ZHANG An, WANG Qiang. Research on unmanned aircraft controlled and autonomous attack system based on fuzzy control theory[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2015, 40(12): 44–47 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  17. XIONG Huajie, YU Baoguo, HE Chenglong. UAV path planning method based on lmproved PSO[J]. Computer Measurement & Control, 2015, 40(12): 44–47 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  18. ZHAO Qinglu, ZHOU Chengping. Research on collaborative path planning algorithm based on genetic algorithm[J]. Journal of Projectiles, Rockets, Missiles and Guidance, 2014, 34(1): 46–50 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  19. ZHANG Kun, LI Ke, SHI Haotian, et al. Autonomous guidance maneuver control and decision-making algorithm based on deep reinforcement learning UAV route[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42(7): 1567–1574 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  20. ZHANG J, YU Y, ZHENG L, et al. Situational continuity-based air combat autonomous maneuvering decision-making[J]. Defence Technology, 2023, 29: 66–79 [Google Scholar]
  21. HE Xu, JING Xiaoning, FENG Chao. Air combat maneuver decision based on MCTS method[J]. Journal of Air Force Engineering University, 2017, 18(5): 36–41 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  22. XIE Jianfeng, YANG Qiming, DAI Shuling, et al. Air combat maneuver decision based on reinforcement genetic algorithm[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2020, 38(6): 1330–1338. [Article] (in Chinese) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  23. QIAN Haili. A path planning method based on dynamic RCS[J]. Electronic Technology & Software Engineering, 2020(6): 75–76 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  24. FANG Wei, FANG Jun, XU Tao, et al. Method of situation assessment in beyond visual range air combat simulation[J]. Computer Simulation, 2019, 36(10): 29–33 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  25. WU Wenhai, ZHOU Siyu, GAO Li, et al. Improvements of situation assessment for beyond visual range air combat based on missile launching envelope analysis[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2011, 33(12): 2679–2685 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  26. SHIN J J, BANG H. UAV path planning under dynamic threats using an improved PSO algorithm[J]. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2020, 2020(1): 8820284 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.