Open Access
Issue
JNWPU
Volume 44, Number 1, February 2026
Page(s) 92 - 101
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/jnwpu/20264410092
Published online 27 April 2026
  1. Zhang Wenchang. UAV application and thinking[J]. Defence Science & Technology Industry, 2023(4): 47–49 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  2. Gugan G, Haque A. Path planning for autonomous drones: challenges and future directions[J]. Drones, 2023, 7(3): 169 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  3. Shen Lincheng, Chen Jing, Wang Nan. Overview of air vehicle mission planning techniques[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2014, 35(3): 593–606 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  4. Moon S, Jeon J, Kim D, et al. Swarm reconnaissance drone system for real-time object detection over a large area[J]. IEEE Access, 2023, 11: 23505–23516 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cai Bowen. Reflections on our army's urban warfare in the battle of Mosul[J]. Military Digest, 2018(13): 71–74 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  6. Song Y, Xi Q, Xing X, et al. Multi-UAV cooperative multi-target allocation method based on differential evolutionary algorithm[C]//2020 39th Chinese Control Conference, 2020: 1655-1660. [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen J, Li M, Yuan Z, et al. An improved A* algorithm for UAV path planning problems[C]//2020 IEEE 4th Information Technology, Networking, Electronic and Automation Control Conference, 2020: 958-962. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bai X, Jiang H, Cui J, et al. UAV path planning based on improved A* and DWA algorithms[J]. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2021(1): 4511252 [Google Scholar]
  9. Jayaweera H M, Hanoun S. A dynamic artificial potential field(D-APF) UAV path planning technique for following ground moving targets[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8192760–192776 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  10. Guo Yicong, Liu Xiaoxiong, Zhang Weiguo, et al. 3D path planning method for UAV based on improved artificial field[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2020, 38(5): 977–986 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  11. Li Q, Wei C, Wu J, et al. Improved PRM method of low altitude penetration trajectory planning for UAVs[C]//Proceedings of 2014 IEEE Chinese Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference, 2014: 2651-2656. [Google Scholar]
  12. Li W, Wang L, Zou A,et al. Path planning for UAV based on improved PRM[J]. Energies, 2022, 15(19): 7267 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  13. Guo Y, Liu X, Liu X, et al. FC-RRT*: an improved path planning algorithm for UAV in 3D complex environment[J]. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 2022, 11(2): 112 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  14. Yang F, Fang X, Gao F, et al. Obstacle avoidance path planning for UAV based on improved RRT algorithm[J]. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2022(1): 4544499 [Google Scholar]
  15. Aljalaud F, Kurdi H, Youcef-Toumi K. Bio-inspired multi-UAV path planning heuristics: a review[J]. Mathematics, 2023, 11(10): 2356 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  16. Shi K, Zhang X, Xia S. Multiple swarm fruit fly optimization algorithm based path planning method for multi-UAVs[J]. Applied Sciences, 2020, 10(8): 2822 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lu Ying, Pang Lichen, Chen Yusi, et al. A swarm intelligence algorithm for UAV path planning in urban warfare[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(S2): 146–156 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  18. Ail Z A, Zhangang H, Zhengru D. Path planning of multiple UAVs using MMACO and DE algorithm in dynamic environment[J]. Measurement and Control, 2023, 56(3/4): 459–469 [Google Scholar]
  19. Aljalaud F, Kurdi H, Youcef-Toumi K. Autonomous multi-UAV path planning in pipe inspection missions based on booby beha-vior[J]. Mathematics, 2023, 11(9): 2092 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  20. Shin J J, Bang H. UAV path planning under dynamic threats using an improved PSO algorithm[J]. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2020(1): 8820284 [Google Scholar]
  21. Dechter R, Pearl J. Generalized best-first search strategies and the optimality of A*[J]. Journal of the ACM, 1985, 32(3): 505–536 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sniedovich M. Dijkstra's algorithm revisited: the dynamic programming connexion[J]. Control and Cybernetics, 2006, 35(3): 599–620 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.