Torpedo electromagnetic fuze active interference recognition based on improved AlexNet

基于改进AlexNet的水中兵器电磁引信有源干扰识别方法

¹ School of Marine Science and Technology, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China
² The 705 Research Institute, China Shipbuilding Industry Corporation, Xi'an 710075, China

Received: 24 October 2023

Abstract

In order to enhance the active interference signal recognition capability of the electromagnetic fuze of a torpedo in the marine electromagnetic environment, a method for recognizing the electromagnetic fuze's active interference based on the improved AlexNet is proposed. Interference signal models and marine electromagnetic wave channel models are established. The time-frequency plots of interference signals propagated through the marine electromagnetic wave channel are extracted into datasets. The trained network model is improved by optimizing the network structure, adding data labels and augmenting data. The recognition rate and complexity of the model under different jamming-to-noise ratio(JNR) conditions are provided. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed method achieves a high interference recognition rate under the low JNR condition, accurately recognizes the electromagnetic fuze's active interference and exhibits low model complexity.

摘要

为了提升海洋电磁环境下水中兵器电磁引信有源干扰信号的识别能力, 提出了一种基于改进AlexNet的水中兵器电磁引信有源干扰识别方法。建立了干扰信号模型与海洋电磁波信道模型, 提取经海洋电磁波信道传播后的干扰信号时频图作为数据集, 通过优化网络结构、增加数据标签、数据增强等方法改进训练出的网络模型, 给出了不同干噪比(jamming-to-noise ratio, JNR)条件下的模型识别率及复杂度。仿真结果表明, 文中所提方法能在低JNR条件下达到较高的干扰识别率, 能够准确识别水中兵器电磁引信有源干扰, 同时具有较低的模型复杂度。

1. WANG Shaoqing. Principles and design of proximity fuzes for torpedoes[M]. Xi'an: Northwestern Polytechnical University Press, 1992: 10–50 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
2. JIAO Yucheng. Analysis and research of the electromagnetic properties of seawater[J]. Ship Electronic Engineering, 2018, 38(8): 176–179 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
3. REN Bo. Research and application on radar polarization statistical characteristics of multipoint-source interferences[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2016 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
4. LI PingHAO XinhongYAN Xiaopeng, et al. Theory of radio fuze anti-jamming BeijingBeijing Institute of Technology Press201949–77 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
5. ZHU P, ISAACS J, FU B, et al. Deep learning feature extraction for target recognition and classification in underwater sonar images[C]//2017 IEEE 56th Annual Conference on Decision and Control, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, 2017: 2724–2731 [Google Scholar]
6. WILLIAMS D P. Underwater target classification in synthetic aperture sonar imagery using deep convolutional neural networks[C]//2016 23rd International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Cancun, Mexico, 2016: 2497–2502 [Google Scholar]
7. MENG TJING X YYAN Z, et al. A survey on machine learning for data fusion[J]. Information Fusion, 20205): 115–129 [Google Scholar]
8. GAO ZejunCAO FeiHE Chuan, et al. Radar active jamming identification based on semi-supervised learning network[J]. Journal of Detection&Control, 2022, 44(6): 93–101 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
9. WANG PengyuCHENG YufanXU Hao, et al. Jamming classification using convolutional neural network-based joint multi-domain feature extraction[J]. Journal of Signal Processing, 2022, 38(5): 915–925 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
10. PENG S LSUN S JYAO Y D. A survey of modulation classification using deep learning: signal representation and data preprocessing[J]. IEEE Trans on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2022, 33(12): 7020–7038 [Google Scholar]
11. DIVYA S, ADEPU B, KAMAKSHI P. Image enhancement and classification of cifar-10 using convolutional neural networks[C]//2022 4th International Conference on Smart Systems and Inventive Technology, Tirunelveli, India, 2022: 1–7 [Google Scholar]
12. QIU Xipeng. Neural networks and deep learning[M]. Beijing: China Machine Press, 2020: 79–127 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
13. SHEN ZheXIAO SujuanNAN Changjiang, et al. Technology on torpedo warhead and fuze[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2009: 80–115 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
14. LI SuyiZHANG YiZHANG Jikun, et al. A review of noise suppression methods for marine controlled source electromagnetic signals[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2020, 55(6): 1383–1394 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
15. WANG Jun. Research on underwater narrowband high-speed electromagnetic wave communication technology[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2019 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
16. NIE ZhiqiangWANG ShilianDENG Tian. A Method of short distance and ultra-wideband underwater electromagnetic communication based on OFDM[J]. Ship Electronic Engineering, 2017, 37(8): 70–74 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
17. MA JianZHANG GuangjinZHANG Lei, et al. Improved ResNet algorithm based intelligent interference identification[J]. Telecommunications Science, 2022, 38(10): 98–106 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
18. JIAO L BHUO L ZHU C M, et al. Refined UNDT: UNET-based refinement network for cloud and shadow precise segmentation[J]. Remote Sensing, 2020, 12(12): 2001 [Google Scholar]
19. ZHU ZhangliRAO YuanWU Yuan, et al. Research progress of attention mechanism in deep learning[J]. Journal of Chinese Information Processing, 2019, 33(6): 1–11 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
20. LIU Qiang. Radar interference recognition based on deep learning[D]. Chengdu: University of Electronic Science and Technology, 2020 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
21. ZHU K, TIAN J, HUANG H, Underwater object images classification based on convolutional neural network[C]//2018 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Signal and Image Processing, Shenzhen, China, 2018: 301–305 [Google Scholar]