EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 37 / No 1 (February 2019) JNWPU, 37 1 (2019) 167-176 References
Open Access
Issue
JNWPU
Volume 37, Number 1, February 2019
Page(s) 167 - 176
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/jnwpu/20193710167
Published online 03 April 2019
  1. Nakayama H, Kim H J, Matsushima K, et al. Aerodynamic Optimization of Multi-Element Airfoil[C]//AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 2006 [Google Scholar]
  2. Meredith P T. Viscous Phenomena Affecting High-Lift Systems and Suggestions for Future CFD Development[C]//Agard Conference Proceedings 515 High-Lift System Aerodynamics, 1993, 19: 1-8 [Google Scholar]
  3. Scholz P, Mahmood S, Casper M, et al. Design of Active Flow Control at a Drooped Spoiler Configuration[C]//AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, 2006 [Google Scholar]
  4. Shen Guangchen, Bai Junqiang, Liu Nan, et al. Mechanical Simulation and Aerodynamic Analysis on a New Type of Wing Trailing Edge Variable Camber[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2016, 34(4): 578-586 (in Chinese) [Article] [Google Scholar]
  5. Rozhdestvensky K V. Aerodynamics of a Lifting System in Extreme Ground Effect[M]. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2000 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Melvin A, Martinelli L. Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of Multi-Element Airfoils in Ground Effect[C]//AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 2008 [Google Scholar]
  7. Ahmed M R, Takasaki T, Kohama Y. Aerodynamics of a NACA4412 Airfoil in Ground Effect[J]. AIAA Journal, 2007, 45(1): 37-47 [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Qin Xuguo, Liu Peiqing, Qu Qiulin, et al. Numerical Simulation and Analysis on Aerodynamics of Three-Element Airfoil in Ground Effect[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2011, 26(4): 890-897 (in Chinese) [Article] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hsiun C M, Chen C K. Aerodynamic Characteristics of a Two Dimensional Airfoil with Ground Effect[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1996, 33(2): 386-392 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Qu Q L, Wang W, Liu P, et al. Airfoil Aerodynamics in Ground Effect for Wide Range of Angles of Attack[J]. AIAA Journal, 2015, 53(4): 1-14 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Qu Q L, Wang W, Liu P, et al. Aerodynamics and Flow Mechanics of a Two-Element Airfoil in Ground Effect[C]//AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 2015 [Google Scholar]
  12. He Yuwei, Li Yalin, Zheng Longqian. Numerical Simulation on Aerodynamics of Three-Element Airfoil in Ground Effect[J]. China Science and Technology Review, 2012(9): 100-102 (in Chinese) [Article] [Google Scholar]
  13. Qu Q L, Huang L, Liu P, et al. Numerical Study of Aerodynamics and Flow Physics of the 30P30N Three-Element Airfoil in Dynamic Ground Effect[C]//AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. 2016 [Google Scholar]
  14. Rumsey C L, Ying S X. Prediction of High Lift:Review of Present CFD Capability[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2002, 38(2): 145-180 [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Menter F R. Zonal Two-Equation K-W Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows[R]. AIAA-1933-2906 [Google Scholar]
  16. Catalano P, Amato M. An evaluation of RANS Turbulence Modelling for Aerodynamic Applications[J]. Aerospace Science & Technology, 2003, 7(7): 493-509 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Eliasson P, Catalano P, Pape M C L, et al. Improved CFD Predictions for High Lift Flows in the European Project EUROLIFT Ⅱ[C]//AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, 2007 [Google Scholar]
  18. Zerihan J, Zhang X. Aerodynamics of a Single Element wing in Ground Effect[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2000, 37(6): 1058-1064 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Moir I R M. Measurements on a Two-Dimensional Aerofoil with High-Lift Devices: a Selection of Experimental Test Cases for the Validation of CFD Codes[R]. AGARD-AR-303, 1994 [Google Scholar]
  20. Fejtek I. Summary of Code Validation Results for a Multiple Element Airfoil Test Case[C]//European Conference on Information Systems, 2013: 422-432 [Google Scholar]
  21. Smith A M O. High-Lift Aerodynamic[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1975, 12(6): 501-530 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.