EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 37 / No 2 (April 2019) JNWPU, 37 2 (2019) 211-217 References
Open Access
Issue
JNWPU
Volume 37, Number 2, April 2019
Page(s) 211 - 217
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/jnwpu/20193720211
Published online 05 August 2019
  1. Rodriguez A Dickeson J, Cifdaloz O, et al. Modeling and Control of Scramjet-Powered Hypersonic Vehicles: Challenges, Trends, and Tradeoffs[C]//AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit, 2008 [Google Scholar]

  2. Jia Zian, Zhang Chenan, Wang Kemu, et al. Longitudinal Static Stability Analysis of Hypersonic Waveriders[J]. Science China, 2014, 44(10):1114-1122 (in Chinese)

    [Google Scholar]

  3. Luo Wenli, Li Daochun, Xiang Jinwu. Aerodynamic Characteristics Analysis of Air-Breathing Hypersonic Vehicle at High Angle of Attack[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(1):223-231 (in Chinese) [Article]

    [Google Scholar]
  4. Su Erlong, Luo Jianjun, Min Changwan. Analysis and Control of Nonlinear of Stability of Longitudinal Flight Dynamics of Hypersonic Vehicle with High Angle of Attack Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(S1): S80–S90 (in Chinese) [Article] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hou Zhenqian, Liang Xiaogeng, Yang Jun. μ Analysis Based Stability Margin Clearance of Missile Autopilot Computer Measurement & Control, 2012, 20(8): 2177–2179 (in Chinese) [Article] [Google Scholar]
  6. Girish D, Vijay P. A 'Modern' Look at Gain and Phase Margins-an H-Infinity/M Approach[C]//Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, 1998 [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhou Kemin, Doyle John C, Glover KeithRobust and Optimal Control[M]. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1996, 413–446 [Google Scholar]
  8. Gahinet P, Apkarian P. Decentralized and Fixed-Structure H∞ Control in MATLAB[C]//Decision & Control & European Control Conference, 2012 [Google Scholar]
  9. Gahinet P, Apkarian P. Structured H∞ Synthesis in MATLAB[J]. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 2011, 44(1): 1435–1440 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Loquen T, De Plinval H, Cumer C, et al. Attitude Control of Satellites with Flexible Appendages: a Structured H∞ Control Design[C]//AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, 2012 [Google Scholar]
  11. Knoblauch M, SaussiÉ D, BÉrard C. Structured H∞ Control for a Launch Vehicle[C]//American Control Conference, 2012 [Google Scholar]
  12. Siqueira D, Paglione P, Moreira F J O. Robust Fixed Structured Output Feedback Flight Control Law Synthesis and Analysis Using Singular Structuredd Value[J]. Aerospace Science & Technology, 2013, 30(1): 102–107 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hugo Lhachemi, David Saussie, Guchuan Zhu. Robust and Self-Scheduled Longitudinal Flight Control System: a Multi-Model and Structured H-infinity Approach[C]//AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, 2014 [Google Scholar]
  14. Florian S, Spilios T, Philippe W, et al. Pitch/Yaw Channels Control Design for a 155mm Projectile with Rotating Canards, Using a H∞ Loop-Shaping Design Procedure[C]//AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, 2014 [Google Scholar]
  15. Orsi M A M R. A Nonsmooth Optimization Approach to H∞ Synthesis[C]//Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 2013 [Google Scholar]
  16. James V B, Didier H, Adrian S Let al. Stabilization via Nonsmooth, Nonconvex Optimization[J]. IEEE Trans on Automatic Control, 2006, 51(11): 1760–1769 [Article] [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  17. Bompart V, Noll D, Apkarian P. Second-Order Non-Smooth Optimization for H∞ Synthesis. Numerische Mathematik, 2007, 107(3): 433–454 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jason T P, Andrea S, Stephen Yet al. Control-Oriented Modeling of an Air-Breathing Hypersonic Vehicle[J]. Journal of Guidance Control & Dynamics, 2007, 30(3): 856–869 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.