EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 37 / No 6 (December 2019) JNWPU, 37 6 (2019) 1174-1183 References
Open Access
Issue
JNWPU
Volume 37, Number 6, December 2019
Page(s) 1174 - 1183
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/jnwpu/20193761174
Published online 11 February 2020
  1. Chhim P, Chinnam R B, Sadawi N. Product Design and Manufacturing Process Based Ontology for Manufacturing Knowledge Reuse[J]. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2019, 30(2): 905–916 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chen W L, Xie S Q, Zeng F F, et al. A New Process Knowledge Representation Approach Using Parameter Flow Chart[J]. Computers in Industry, 2011, 62(1): 9–22 [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Wang W, Li Y, Huang L. Rule and Branch-and-Bound Algorithm Based Sequencing of Machining Features for Process Planning of Complex Parts[J]. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2018, 29(6): 1329–1336 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Li Chunlei, Mo Rong, Chang Zhiyong, et al. Knowledge Representation and Push of Machining Process Driven by Geometric Variation[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2016, 22(6): 1434–1446 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhang X Z, Nassehi A, Safaieh M, et al. Process Comprehension for Shopfloor Manufacturing Knowledge Reuse[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2013, 51(23/24): 7405–7419 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhang Y Z, Luo X F, Zhang H, et al. A Knowledge Representation for Unit Manufacturing Processes[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2014, 73(5/6/7/8): 1011–1031 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kiritsis D. A Review of Knowledge-Based Expert Systems for Process Planning Methods and Problems[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 1995, 10(4): 240–262 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Liu Z K, Wang L H. Sequencing of Interacting Prismatic Machining Features for Process Planning[J]. Computers in Industry, 2007, 58(4): 295–303 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chang T C. Expert Process Planning for Manufacturing[M]. Menlo Park, Addison-Wesley, 1990 [Google Scholar]
  10. Xu Zengling, Sheng Yongpan, He Lirong, et al. Review on Kniwledge Graph Teehniques[J]. Journal of University of Electroric Science and Technology of China, 2016, 45(4): 589–606 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhang X M, Liu X, Li X, et al. MMKG:an Approach to Generate Metallic Materials Knowledge Graph Based on Dbpedia and Wikipedia[J]. Computer Physics Communications, 2017, 211:98–112 [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kertkidkachorn N, Ichise R. An Automatic Knowledge Graph Creation Framework from Natural Language Text[J]. IEICE Trans on Information and Systems, 2018, 101(1): 90–98 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jin Guiyang, Lyu Fuzai, Xiang Zhanqin. Enterprise Information Integration Based on Knowledge Graph and Semantic Web Technology[J]. Journal of Southeast University, 2014, 44(2): 250–255 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  14. Barbau R, Krima S, Rachuri S, et al. OntoSTEP:Enriching Product Model Data Using Ontologies[J]. Computer-Aided Design, 2012, 44(6): 575–590 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kang S K, Patil L, Rangarajan A, et al. Extraction of Manufacturing Rules from Unstructured Text Using a Semantic Framework[C]//ASME 2015 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, 2015 [Google Scholar]
  16. Li X L, Zhang S S, Huang R, et al. Structured Modeling of Heterogeneous CAM Model Based on Process Knowledge Graph[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2018, 96(9/10/11/12): 4173–4193 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.