Open Access
Volume 38, Number 5, October 2020
Page(s) 977 - 986
Published online 08 December 2020
  1. Li Xiangmin, Bo Ning, Dai Jinjin. Study on Collision Avoidance Path Planning for Multi-UAVs Based on Model Predictive Control[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2017, 35(3), 513–522 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  2. Xu Zhao, Hu Jinwen, Ma Yunhong, et al. A Study on Path Planning Algorithms of UAV Collision Avoidance[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2019, 37(1): 107–113 [Article] (in Chinese) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Suh J, Gong J, Oh S. Fast Sampling-Based Cost-Aware Path Planning with Nonmyopic Extensions Using Cross Entropy[J]. IEEE Trans on Robotics, 2017, 33(6): 1313–1326 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cekmez U, Ozsiginan M, Sahingoz O K. Multi Colony Ant Optimization for UAV Path Planning with Obstacle Avoidance[C]//2016 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems, 2016 [Google Scholar]
  5. Khansari-Zadeh S M, Billard A. A Dynamical System Approach to Realtime Obstacle Avoidance[J]. Autonomous Robots, 2012, 32(4): 433–454 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Yan F, Liu Y S, Xiao J Z. Path Planning in Complex 3D Environments Using a Probabilistic Roadmap Method[J]. International Journal of Automation and Computing, 2013(6): 41–49 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  7. Arantes J D S, Márcio Da Silva Arantes, Toledo C F M, et al. Heuristic and Genetic Algorithm Approaches for UAV Path Planning under Critical Situation[J]. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Tools, 2017, 26(1): 1760008 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lee J, Kwon O, Zhang L, et al. A Selective Retraction-Based RRT Planner for Various Environments[J]. IEEE Trans on Robotics, 2014, 30(4): 1002–1011 10.1109/TRO.2014.2309836

    LEE J, KWON O, ZHANG L, et al. A Selective Retraction-Based RRT Planner for Various Environments[J]. IEEE Trans on Robotics, 2014, 30(4):1002-1011

    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gao Xiaoguang, Li Qingyuan, Di Ruohai. MPC Three-Dimensional Dynamic Path Planning for UAV Based on DBN Threat Assessment[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2014, 36(11): 2200–2205 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  10. Mattei M, Blasi L. Smooth Flight Trajectory Planning in the Presence of No-Fly Zones and Obstacles[J]. Guidance Control Dyn, 2010, 33(2): 454–462 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Yao P, Wang H L, Liu C. 3-D Dynamic Path Planning for UAV Based on Interfered Fluid Flow[C]//Proceedings of 2014 IEEE Chinese Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference, 2014: 997–1002 [Google Scholar]
  12. Khatib O. Real-Time Obstacle Avoidance for Manipulators and Mobile Robots[J]. International Journal of Robotics Research, 1986, 5(1): 90–98 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Xiong Chao, Xie Wujie, Dong Wenhan. Obstacle Avoidance Path Planning for UAV Based on Artificial Potential Field Improved by Collision Cone[J]. Computer Engineering, 2018(9): 314–320 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  14. Luo Guahen, Yu Jianjiao, Mei Yuesong, et al. UAV Path Planning in Mixed-Obstacle Environment via Artificial Potential Field Method Improved by Additional Control Force[J]. Asian Journal of Control, 2014, 17(5): 1600–1610 [Google Scholar]
  15. Huang Y, Hu H, Liu X. Obstacles Avoidance of Artificial Potential Field Method with Memory Function in Complex Environment[C]//Intelligent Control & Automation, 2010: 6414–6418 [Google Scholar]
  16. Sun J, Tang J, Lao S. Collision Avoidance for Cooperative UAVs with Optimized Artificial Potential Field Algorithm[J]. IEEE Access, 2017, 5: 18382–18390 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Jia Zhengrong, Wang Hangyu, Lu Faxing. Improved Circulating APF Route Planning Based on Obstacle Convexification[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2019, 40(10): 254–268 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  18. Ding Mingyue, Zheng Changwen, Zhou Chengping, et al.Route Planning for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles[M]. Beijing: Publishing House of Electronics Industry, 2009: 41–43 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.