Open Access
Volume 39, Number 3, June 2021
Page(s) 558 - 565
Published online 09 August 2021
  1. Dobrzynski Werner. Almost 40 years of airframe noise research: what did we achieve?[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2010, 47(2): 353–367 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Khorrami M R, Choudhari M, Jenkins L N. Characterization of unsteady flow structures near leading-edge slat[C]//AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, 2004 [Google Scholar]
  3. Hein S, Hohage T, Koch W, et al. Acoustic resonances in a high-lift configuration[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2007, 582: 179–202 10.1017/S0022112007005770 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  4. Imamura T, Enomoto S, Yokokawa Y, et al. Three-dimensional unsteady flow computations around a conventional slat of high-lift devices[J]. AIAA Journal, 2008, 46(5): 1045–1053 10.2514/1.25660 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. König D, Koh S R, Meinke M, et al. Two-step simulation of slat noise[J]. Computers & Fluids, 2010, 39( 3): 512–524 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Terracol M, Manoha E, Lemoine B. Investigation of the unsteady flow and noise generation in a slat cove[J]. AIAA Journal, 2016, 54(2): 469–489 10.2514/1.J053479 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rossiter J E. Calculating centile curves using kernel density estimation methods with application to infant kidney lengths[J]. Statistics in Medicine, 2010, 10(11): 1693–1701 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Souza D S, Rodriguez D, Medeiros M. A study of the sources of slat noise using proper orthogonal decomposition[C]//AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, 2013 [Google Scholar]
  9. Souza D, Pagani C, RodrÍguez D, et al. Hydrodynamic instability in the generation of slat noise[J]. Procedia Iutam, 2015, 14: 344–353 10.1016/j.piutam.2015.03.058 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Peng C, Wang X, Wen Y. Modes of pressure fluctuations around a leading-edge slat[M]. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 2014 [Google Scholar]
  11. Wei Jaiyu, Li Weipeng, Xu Siwei, et al. Analysis of mechanism of slat low frequency noise based on zonal DMD[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2018, 39(1): 182–192 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  12. Wang Hongjian, Luo Wang, Zhang Rui. The analysis of noise features for multi-element airfoil based on slat configuration parameters[J]. Advances in Aeronautical Scienceand Engineering, 2018, 9(1): 53–61 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  13. Wang Hongjian, Tian Junyuan, Luo Wang. Three-dimensional simulation analysis of the influence of slat structural parameters on slat aerodynamic noise[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2019, 37(6): 1129–1137 [Article] (in Chinese) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Murayama M, Nakakita K, Yamamoto K, et al. Experimental study on slat noise from 30P-30N three-element high-lift airfoil at jaxa hard-wall lowspeed wind tunnel[C]//20th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference. 2014 [Google Scholar]
  15. Choudhari M, Lockard D. Assessment of slat noise predictions for 30P-30N high-lift confifiguration from BANC-III workshop[C]//Proceedings of the 21st AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Dallas, 2015: 1–41 [Google Scholar]
  16. Liu Caoqu. Liutex-third generation of vortex definition and identification methods[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2020, 38(3): 413–431 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2020.0015 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  17. Chen P, Zhang X, Angland D. Slat noise reduction using leading edge strips[C]//17th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, 2011 [Google Scholar]
  18. Ye Ke, Wu Jie, Ye Zhengyan, et al. Anslysis circular cylinder flow using dynamic mode and proper orthogonal decomposition[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2017, 35(4): 599–607 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2758.2017.04.007[Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  19. Buchmann N A, Kitsios V, Atkinson C, et al. Investigation of coherent structures and dynamics using POD and DMD of a separated airfoil subjected to znmf jet forcing[C]//International Conference on Instability & Control of Massively Separated Flows, 2013 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.