Open Access
Volume 39, Number 4, August 2021
Page(s) 786 - 793
Published online 23 September 2021
  1. Liao Daxiong, Chen Jiming, Peng Qiang, et al. Key design techniques of the low noise continuous transonic wind tunnel[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2011, 25(4): 74–78 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  2. Chen Dehua, Yin Luping, Wu Wenhua, et al. The test technique for aircraft with high aspect ratio in the 2.4 meter transonic wind tunnel[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2009, 27(5): 542–546 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  3. Bope Au, Gernk Li. High speed wind tunnel testing[M]. Deng Zhenying, Li Yanlin, translated. Beijing: Science Press, 1983 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  4. Wu Shenghao, Fei Haitao, Chen Jiming, et al. Application of center-line probe in transonic wind tunnel[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2018, 33(10): 2451–2457 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  5. Liu Zhengchong, Liao Daxiong, Dong Yixin, et al. Aerodynamic and structural design of high and low speed wind tunnel[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2003: 282–283 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  6. Jackson F M. Calibration of the AEDC-PWT 16-ft transonic tunnel at test section wall porosities of two, four, and six percent[R]. AEDC-TR-76-13, 1976 [Google Scholar]
  7. Reed T D. Calibration of transonic and supersonic wind tunnels[R]. NASA-CR-2920, 1987 [Google Scholar]
  8. Dick R S. The influence of several cable-type supports upon the static pressures along the centerline tube in a transonic wind tunnel[R]. AEDC-TN-54-26, 1955 [Google Scholar]
  9. Jackson F M. Supplemental calibration results for the AEDC propulsion wind tunnel(l6T)[R]. AEDC-TR-70-l63, 1970 [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen Dehua, Wang Weixin, Wang Jinjun, et al. Investigation on flow-field debugging for 2.4 m transonic wind tunnel[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2004, 22(3): 279–282 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen Dehua, Wang Ruibo, Liu Guangyuan, et al. The test and flow field calibration of 2.4 m transonic wind tunnel slotted test section[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2013, 27(4): 66–70 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  12. Liu Guangyuan, Wang Ruibo, Guo Qiuting, et al. Wall parameters influence on centerline flow uniformity in 2.4 m transonic wind tunnel[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(9): 2930–2938 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  13. Li Feng, Gao Cao, Zhang Zhengke, et al. The test of characteristics of flow area and calibration model in NF-6 pressurized continuous transonic wind tunnel[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2013, 27(1): 61–64 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  14. Charlie M J. Description and calibration of the langley unitary plan wind tunnel[R]. NASA-TP-1905 [Google Scholar]
  15. Bobbitt C J. National transonic Facility characterization status[R]. AIAA-2000-0293 [Google Scholar]
  16. Kohzai M, Ueno M, Shiohara T, et al. Calibration of the test section mach number in the jaxa 2 m×2 m transonic wind tunnel[R]. AIAA-2008-0848 [Google Scholar]
  17. Xiong Bo, Zhou Enmin, Cheng Song, et al. Research on key technologies of debugging and operating in 0.6 m×0.6 m continuous transonic wind tunnel[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2016, 30(4): 81–86 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  18. Li Zhuangsheng, Yang Pengcheng, Chen Dan, et al. The design of total pressure control strategy for 0.6 m continuous transonic wind tunnel[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2016, 30(4): 87–92 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  19. Pang Yinliang, Song Weidong, Yang Xiaolin, et al. Fluent-based aerodynamic simulation of terminal guided projectile in its initial stage[J]. Ordnance Industry Automation, 2009, 28(2): 13–15 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhang Yancheng. Numerical research of flow fieldof fins rocket[D]. Taiyuan: North University of China, 2011: 11-42 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  21. Chevalier H L. Calibration of the PWT 16-ft transonic circuit with a modified model support system and test section[R]. AEDC-TN-60-164, 1960 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.