Open Access
Issue
JNWPU
Volume 39, Number 6, December 2021
Page(s) 1188 - 1195
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/jnwpu/20213961188
Published online 21 March 2022
  1. Wu Ximing. Aerodynamic problems and research progresses of rigid coaxial rotor[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, 2019, 51(2): 137–146 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  2. Nick Tuozzo, Eric Fox, Erez Eller, et al. Analytic tool correlation status for the joint multi-role technology demonstrator program[C]//73rd Annual AHS International Forum and Technology Display, Texas, 2017 [Google Scholar]
  3. Peter Lorber, Patrick Bowles, Eric Fox, et al. Wind tunnel testing for the SB>1 defiantTM joint multi-role technology demonstrator[C]//73rd Annual AHS International Forum and Technology Display, Texas, 2017 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bjorn C F, Jordan A K, Alexander Q W, et al. Speed and maneuverability benefits of Sikorsky's X2 technologyTM versus air defense artillery[C]//75th Annual Vertical Flight Society Forum and Technology Display, Philadelphia, 2019: 2751–2756 [Google Scholar]
  5. Deng Jinghui. The ABC rotor technology for high speed helicopter[J]. Aeronautical Science and Technology, 2012(3): 9–14 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  6. Burgess R. The ABC(TM) Rotor-a historical perspective[C]//60th AHS International Annual Forum Vertical Flight Transformation, Baltimore MD, 2004 [Google Scholar]
  7. Blackwell R, Millott T. Dynamics design characteristics of the Sikorsky X2 technologyTM demonstrator aircraft[C]//64th Annual AHS International Forum and Technology Display, Montreal, 2008 [Google Scholar]
  8. Christopher Cameron, Jayant Sirohi. Performance and loads of a model coaxial rotor part I: wind tunnel testing[C]//72nd Annual AHS International Forum and Technology Display, West Palm Beach, 2016 [Google Scholar]
  9. Joseph Schmaus, Inderjit Chopra. Performance and loads of a model coaxial rotor part II: prediction validations with measurements[C]//72nd Annual AHS International Forum and Technology Display, West Palm Beach, 2016: 1309-1326 [Google Scholar]
  10. Vera Klimchenko, James Baeder. CFD/CSD study of interactional aerodynamics of a coaxial compound helicopter in high speed forward flight[C]//AIAA Sci Tech Form and Expositon, Applied aerodynamics, Oriando, 2020 [Google Scholar]
  11. Uehara Dajiu, SirohiJayant. Blade passage loads and deformation of a coaxial rotor system in hover[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2019, 56(6): 2144–2157 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Roland Feil, Manfred Hajek. Vibratory load predictions of a high-advance-ratio coaxial rotor system validated by wind tunnel tests[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2020, 9(2): 1277–1293 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jacobellis G, Gandhi F. Investigation of performance, loads, and vibrations of a coaxial helicopter in high speed-flight[C]//72nd Annual AHS International Forum and Technology Display, West Palm Beach, 2016 [Google Scholar]
  14. Lu Congling, Shi Yongjie, Xu Guohua, et al. Research on aerodynamic interaction mechanism of rigid rotor in hover[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, 2019, 51(2): 201–207 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  15. Tan Jianfeng, Sun Yiming, Wang Haowen, et al. Analysis of rigid coaxial rotor unsteady interactional aerodynamic loads[J]. Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2018, 44(1): 50–62 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  16. Yu Zhihao. Computational analysis on vibration loads of coaxial rigid rotor based on CFD/CSD coupling[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2018 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  17. Wang Song. Trim and load estimation of steady flight state of helicopter based on CFD/CSD loose coupling[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2019 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  18. Felker F F. Performance and loads data form a wind tunnel test of a full-scale, coaxial, hingeless rotor helicopter[R]. NASA TM81329, 1981 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.