Open Access
Volume 40, Number 2, April 2022
Page(s) 281 - 287
Published online 03 June 2022
  1. Wang Guobiao, Chen Diansheng, Chen Kewei, et al. The current research status and development strategy on biomimetic robot[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2015, 51(13): 27–44 [Article] (in Chinese) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Platzer M F, Jones K D, Young J, et al. Flapping wing aerodynamics: progress and challenges[J]. AIAA Journal, 2008, 46(9): 2136–2149 [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Andersen A, Bohr T, Schnipper T, et al. Wake structure and thrust generation of a flapping foil in two-dimensional flow[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2017, 812: 1–12 [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Deng J, Sun L, Teng L, et al. The correlation between wake transition and propulsive efficiency of a flapping foil: a numerical study[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2016, 28(9): 33–53 [Google Scholar]
  5. Young J, Lai J. Oscillation frequency and amplitude effects on the wake of a plunging airfoil[J]. AIAA Journal, 2004, 42(10): 2042–2052 [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Vandenberghe N, Zhang J, Childress S. Symmetry breaking leads to forward flapping flight[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2004, 506: 147–155 [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Alben S, Shelley M. Coherent locomotion as an attracting state for a free flapping body[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005, 102(32): 1163–1166 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hu J, Xiao Q. Three-dimensional effects on the translational locomotion of a passive heaving wing[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2014, 46: 77–88[Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Arora N, Gupta A, Sanghi S, et al. Flow patterns and efficiency-power characteristics of a self-propelled, heaving rigid flat plate[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2016, 66: 517–542 [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lin X, Wu J, Zhang T. Performance investigation of a self-propelled foil with combined oscillating motion in stationary fluid[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2019, 175: 33–49 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Buren T V, Floryan D, Quinn D, et al. Nonsinusoidal gaits for unsteady propulsion[J]. Physical Review Fluids, 2017, 2(5): 1–13 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wu T Y. On theoretical modeling of aquatic and aerial animal locomotion[J]. Advances in Applied Mechanics, 2001, 38: 291–353 [Google Scholar]
  13. Lu K, Xie Y H, Zhang D. Numerical study of large amplitude, nonsinusoidal motion and camber effects on pitching airfoil propulsion[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2013, 36(1): 184–194 [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kern S, Koumoutsakos P. Simulations of optimized anguilliform swimming[J]. Journal of Experimental Biloogy, 2006, 209: 4841–4857 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Quinn D B, Lauder G V, Smits A J. Flexible propulsors in ground effect[J]. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2014, 9(3): 036008 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.