EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 40 / No 3 (June 2022) JNWPU, 40 3 (2022) 493-503 References
Open Access
Issue
JNWPU
Volume 40, Number 3, June 2022
Page(s) 493 - 503
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/jnwpu/20224030493
Published online 19 September 2022
  1. Kennedy J, EBERHART R. Particle swarm optimization[C]//Proceedings of International Conference on Neural Networks, 1995: 1942-1948 [Google Scholar]
  2. YANG X S, DEB S. Cuckoo search via Lévy flights[C]//2009 World Congress on Nature & Biologically Inspired Computing, 2009: 210-214 [Google Scholar]
  3. STORN R, PRICE K. Differential evolution-a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces[J]. Journal of Global Optimization, 1997, 11(4): 341–359 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. CLERC M, KENNEDY J. The particle swarm-explosion, stability, and convergence in a multidimensional complex space[J]. IEEE Trans on Evolutionary Computation, 2002, 6(1): 58–73 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. MENDES R, KENNEDY J, NEVES J. The fully informed particle swarm: simpler, maybe better[J]. IEEE Trans on Evolutionary Computation, 2004, 8(3): 204–210 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. LI Ding, XIA Lu. Application of a hybrid particle swarm optimization to airfoil design[J]. Aeronautical Computing Technique, 2010, 40(6): 66–71 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  7. SHI Jiying, GONG Ying, XUE Fei, et al. Distribution network reconfiguration with PSO-CS algorithm considering electric vehicles[J]. Proceedings of the CSU-EPSA, 2018, 30(2): 66–70 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  8. MIRJALILI S, MIRJALILI S M, LEWIS A. Grey wolf optimizer[J]. Advances in Engineering Software, 2014, 69: 46–61 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. HU Jianxiu, ZENG Jianchao. Selection on intertia weicht of particle swarm optimization[J]. Computer Engineering, 2007(11): 193–195 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  10. COOK P, MCDONALD M, FIRMIN M. Aerofoil RAE-2822: pressure distributions, and boundary layer and wake measurements[R]. AGARD AR-138-A6, 1979 [Google Scholar]
  11. KULFAN B M. Universal parametric geometry representation method[J]. Journal of aircraft, 2008, 45(1): 142–158[Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. BU Yuepeng, SONG Wenping, HAN Zhonghua, et al. Aerodynamin optimization design of airfoil based on CST parameterization method[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2013, 31(5): 829–836 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  13. SACKS J, WELCH W J, MITCHELL T J, et al. Design and analysis of computer experiments[J]. Statistical Science, 1989, 4(4): 409–423 [Google Scholar]
  14. WANG Chao, GAO Zhenghong, ZHANG Wei, et al. Effivient surrogate-based aerodynamic design optimization method with adaptive design space expansion[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2018, 39(7): 45–63 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  15. SCHMITT V, CHARPIN F. Pressure distributions on the ONERA-M6-Wing at transonic mach numbers[R]. AGARD AR-138-B1, 1979 [Google Scholar]
  16. SEDERBERG T W, PARRY S R. Free-form deformation of solid geometric models[C]//Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, 1986: 151-160 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.