Open Access
Volume 40, Number 4, August 2022
Page(s) 819 - 828
Published online 30 September 2022
  1. YIN Likui, JIANG Jianwei. Calculation model of initial velocity field on multi-layered spherical fragments warhead[J]. Chinese Journal of Energetic Materials, 2014, 22(3): 300–305 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  2. YIN Likui, JIANG Jianwei, MEN Jianbing, et al. An initial velocity model of explosively-driven cubical fragments[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2014, 12: 1967–1971 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  3. SHI Dangyong, ZHANG Qingming, XIA Changfu. Numerical simulation method and different initiation modes for prefabricated multilayer fragment warhead[J]. Journal of PLA University of Science and Technology, 2009, 10(6): 553–558 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  4. LI Weiping, SUN Hong, ZHANG Haifeng. Numerical simulation of prefabricated-fragment warheads exploding based on ALE method[J]. Journal of Projectiles, Rockets, Missiles and Guidance, 2012, 32(6): 93–95 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  5. WU Jingbo, GOU Ruijun, ZHENG Junjie, et al. Numerical simulation and experiment of premade fragments droved by hexagonal prism shaped warhead[J]. Chinese Journal of Explosives & Propellants, 2016, 39(3): 89–94 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  6. LI Mao, GAO Shengzhi, HOU Hailiang, et al. Projection characteristics of axial prefabricated fragments driven by cylindrical charge[J]. Journal of National University of Defense Technology, 2021, 43(2): 141–147 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  7. TAN Duowang, CAO Renyi, WANG Guangjun, et al. Influence of detonation driving on terminal ballistic effects of tungsten spheres[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2008, 28(6): 481–487 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  8. GONG Xiaoze, GUO Tao, LIU Fei. Typical deformation of tungsten sphere after detonation and its influence on estimation of muzzle velocity[J]. Weapon Test, 2015(6): 47–49 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  9. DHOTE K D, MURTHY K P S, RAJAN K M, et al. Dynamics of multi layered fragment separation by explosion[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2015, 75: 194–202 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. SONG Yujiang, ZHOU Tao, SHEN Fei, et al. Research on the behavior of initial stage about explosively-driven double-layered premade fragments[J]. Chinese Journal of Explosives & Propellants, 2018, 41(3): 308–313 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  11. SHEN Fei, WANG Hui, YUAN Jianfei, et al. Influence of Al content on the driving ability of RDX-based aluminized explosives[J]. Chinese Journal of Explosives & Propellants, 2013, 36(3): 50–53 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  12. YANG Xiangli, HE Yong, HE Yuan. Numerical simulation of cylindrical prefabricated fragment under explosive-driven process[J]. Ordnance Industry Automation, 2016, 35(8): 9–12 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  13. BAI Jinze. Theoretical basis and case analysis of LS-DYNA3D[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2005 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  14. Livermore Software Technology Corporation. LS-DYNA 971 R6.1.0 Keyword Manual Vol II[EB/OL]. (2012-08-24)[2021-08-11]. [Google Scholar]
  15. ZHANG Husheng, ZHANG Baoping, ZHANG Qingming, et al. Dynamic finite element analysis of protective performance of fly-whip multi-function explosive reactive armor[C]//National Conference on Explosion Mechanics, Kunming, 2003 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  16. WU J, LIU J, DU Y. Experimental and numerical study on the flight and penetration properties of explosively-formed projectile[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2007, 34(7): 1147–1162 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. YE Xiaojun. Numerical simulation of the selected warhead's cushion materials of application[J]. Microelectronics & Computer, 2009, 26(4): 226–229 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  18. WANG Shuai, ZHI Xiaoqi, JIA Qiulin, et al. Experiment and numerical simulation of explosive firing based on mass_flux method[J]. Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering, 2020, 41(8): 1–6 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  19. LIANG M Z, LI X Y, LU F Y. Improved method used to investigate the dynamic shear failure of AISI 1045 steel cylinder under blast loading[J]. International Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2016, 8: 165003. [Google Scholar]
  20. O'DONOGHUE P E, PREDEBON W W, ANDERSON C E. Dynamic launch process of performed fragments[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1988, 63(2): 337–348 [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. ANDERSON C E, O'DONOGHUE P E, BODNER S R. Fracture of cubical tungsten specimens under explosive loading[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 1988, 7(4): 371–377 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. QI R, LANGDON G S, CLOETE T J, et al. Behavior of a blast-driven ball bearing embedded in rear detonated cylindrical explosive[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2020, 146: 103698 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.