EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 40 / No 6 (December 2022) JNWPU, 40 6 (2022) 1204-1211 References
Open Access
Issue
JNWPU
Volume 40, Number 6, December 2022
Page(s) 1204 - 1211
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/jnwpu/20224061204
Published online 10 February 2023
  1. AHMED A, BAKUCKAS J G, AWERBUCH J, et al. Fatigue testing of a stiffened lap joint curved fuselage structure[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2007, 44(3): 750–757 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. LIU Jiao. Study on adaptive reduction bound method for reliability analysis of structural systems[D]. Nanning: Guangxi University, 2017: 2-5(in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  3. MUROUTSU Y, OKADA H, NIWA K, et al. Reliability analysis of truss structures by using matrix methods[J]. Journal of Mechanical Design, 1980, 102(4): 749–756 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. MUROUTSU Y, OKADA H, YONEZAWA M, et al. Automatic generation of stochastically dominant modes of structural failure in frame structure[J]. Structural Safety, 1984, 28(2): 17–25 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. DONG Cong. Reliability theory and application of modern structural systems[M]. Beijing, Science Press, 2001: 227–243 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  6. MO Yuanchang. Study on ultimate bearing capacity and system reliability of thin-walled structures[D]. Nanning: Guangxi University, 2008: 54-71 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  7. XIAO Long. Research on failure modes of stainless ateel square pyramid grid structure[J]. Industrial Construction, 2017, 47: 294–296 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  8. GAO Xin, OU Jinping. Branch and bound method for bridge failure mode approach[J]. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2008, 12(4): 227–231 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  9. YAN Xiangqiao, MIAO Chanqing. Interaction of multiple cracks in a rectangular plate[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2012, 36: 5727–5740 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. THOFT-CHRISTENSEN P. Consequence modified β-unzipping of plastic structures[J]. Structural Safety, 1990, 7(2/3/4): 191–198 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. KALATJARI V, KAVEH A, MANSOORIAN P. System reliability assessment of redundant trusses using improved algebraic force method and artificial intelligence[J]. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2011, 12(4): 523–550 [Google Scholar]
  12. DONG Cong. Reliability theory of structural systems: progress and review[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2001, 18(4): 79–88 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  13. JAMES W Provan. Probabilistic fracture mechanics and reliability[M]. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1987 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. SCHIJVE J. Statistical distribution functions and fatigue of structures[J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2005, 27: 1031–1039 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. YU Pengtao. Study on multi-position damage crack propagation life of fuselage skin panel[D]. Tianjin: Civil Aviation University of China, 2015: 16-20 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  16. XIAO Xueqi. Research on fatigue growth life prediction method and reliability of multiple cracks[D]. Xi'an: Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2021: 15-25 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  17. WANG Pengfei. Probabilistic reliability analysis method of aircraft wide-spread fatigue damage oceding time[D]. Xi'an: Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2019: 33-36 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  18. AI Shumin, YU Ming, CHENG Xiaoming, et al. Analysis and application of three-dimensional crack growth based on Franc3D[J]. Mechanical strength, 2018, 40(1): 251–254 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  19. GOLDEN P J, GRANDT A F, BRAY G H. A comparison of fatigue crack formation at holes in 2024-T3 and 2524-T3 aluminum alloy specimens[J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 1999, 21(1): S211–S219 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.