EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 41 / No 2 (April 2023) JNWPU, 41 2 (2023) 264-273 References
Open Access
Issue
JNWPU
Volume 41, Number 2, April 2023
Page(s) 264 - 273
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/jnwpu/20234120264
Published online 07 June 2023
  1. KRVGER W, BESSELINK I, COWLING Det al. Aircraft landing gear dynamics: simulation and control[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 1997, 28(2/3): 119–158 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. FENG Yunwen, ZHU Zhengzheng, YAO Xionghuaet al. Research on safety analysis method of civil aircraft landing gear[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2016, 34(6): 969–975 [Article] [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  3. XUE Jing, LI Yuren, TIAN Guanglaiet al. Finite element analysis of temperature field of aircraft brake disc[J]. Computer Simulation, 2009, 26(4): 27–30 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  4. YANG Quanwei, HE Fadong, WANG Wenjunet al. Linear transformation and robustness in load measurement of aircraft landing gear[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2013, 30(4): 608–612 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  5. SARTOR P, BECKER W, WORDEN Ket al. Bayesian sensitivity analysis of flight parameters in a hard-landing analysis process[J]. Journal of aircraft, 2016, 53(5): 1317–1331 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. QI Mingliang, SHAO Xueyan, CHI Hong. Flight operation risk diagnosis method of QAR overrun event[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronsutics, 2011, 37(10): 1207–1210 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  7. CHEN J, CHEN S, LIU Zet al. Health monitoring of landing gear retraction/extension system based on optimized fuzzy C-means algorithm[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8219611–219621 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. SARTOR P, SCHMIDT R K. Aircraft landing gear structural health monitoring using a loads monitoring approach[J]. Revue Internationale de la Croix-Rouge et Bulletin international des Sociétés de la Croix-Rouge, 2008, 33(387): 1–10 [Google Scholar]
  9. SUN Y G, SUN L. The design of avionics system interfaces emulation and verification platform based on QAR data[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2014, 668/669879–883 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  10. WANG Lei, SUN Ruishan, WU Changxuet al. Quantitative evaluation model of heavy landing risk based on flight QAR data[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2014, 24(2): 88–92 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  11. ZHONG J, WANG D, LI C. A nonparametric health index and its statistical threshold for machine condition monitoring[J]. Measurement, 2020, 167108290 [Google Scholar]
  12. HE Q, YAN R, KONG Fet al. Machine condition monitoring using principal component representations[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2009, 23(2): 446–466 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. CHENG Hongbo, LUN Li, KANG Chenet al. A transformer state evaluation method based on multivariate statistical analysis[J]. Power Grid Technology, 2018, 42(2): 2719–2724 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  14. PEDREGAL D J, CARMEN C M. State space models for condition monitoring: a case study[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2006, 91(2): 171–180 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. SONG Weijie, GUAN Shan, PANG Hongyang. Tool wear state monitoring based on Hilbert-Yellow transform and equidistant feature mapping[J]. Modular Machine Tool and Automatic Processing Technology, 2018, 6114–118 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  16. ATTOUI I, BOUTASSETA N, FERGANI Net al. Novel machinery monitoring strategy based on time-frequency domain similarity measurement with limited labeled data[J]. IEEE Trans on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2020, 703500708 [Google Scholar]
  17. CAO W, CHEN W, DONG Get al. Wear condition monitoring and working pattern recognition of piston rings and cylinder liners using on-line visual ferrograph[J]. Tribology Transactions, 2014, 57(4): 690–699 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. MENG Guang, YOU Mingyi. Research progress of equipment life prediction and preventive maintenance planning based on condition monitoring[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2011, 30(8): 1–11 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  19. DALKIRAN F Y, TORAMAN M. Predicting thrust of aircraft using artificial neural networks[J]. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, 2021, 93(1): 35–41 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. WANG S, ZHANG N, WU Let al. Wind speed forecasting based on the hybrid ensemble empirical mode decomposition and GA-BP neural network method[J]. Renewable Energy, 2016, 94629–636 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. AI Jianliang, YANG Xizhong. An aero-engine fault diagnosis method based on adaptive neural network[J]. Science China Technology Sciences, 2018, 48(3): 326–335 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  22. ZHOU J, QIU Y, ZHU Set al. Optimization of support vector machine through the use of metaheuristic algorithms in forecasting TBM advance rate[J]. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2021, 97(1): 104015 [Google Scholar]
  23. CUI Jianguo, LI Shengnan, YU Mingyueet al. Performance trend prediction analysis of aircraft brake system based on combination prediction model[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2018, 18(31): 179–183 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  24. LI Yaohua, WANG Xingzhou. Fault diagnosis of aircraft hydraulic system[J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2019, 55(5): 232–236 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  25. GU Runping, LAI Jinghan, WEI Zhiqiang. Flight residual oil prediction method based on improved BP neural network[J]. Journal of Flight Mechanics, 2020, 38(4): 76–80 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  26. XU Yi, WANG Huawei, XIONG Minglan. Civil aviation risk assessment system and prediction model based on PCA-GA-BP[J]. Ship Electronic Engineering, 2021, 41(2): 77–81 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  27. MIRJALILI S, LEWIS A. The whale optimization algorithm[J]. Advances in Engineering Software, 2016, 95(1): 51–67 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.