Open Access
Volume 41, Number 2, April 2023
Page(s) 253 - 263
Published online 07 June 2023
  1. ZHOUC, CHANGQ, ZHAOH, et al. Fault tree analysis with interval uncertainty: a case study of the aircraft flap mechanism[J]. IEEE Trans on Reliability, 2020, 99: 1–13 [Google Scholar]
  2. ZHOUChangcong, CHANGQi, ZHOUChunping, et al. Fault tree analysis of an aircraft flap systembased on a non-probability model[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University, 2021, 61(6): 636–642 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  3. CUIL, LUZ, HAOW. Importance analysis of the aircraft flap mechanism movement failure[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2011, 48(2): 606–611 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. MENGWei. Brief talks on the flap system of EMB145 regional jet airplanes[J]. Aviation Maintenance & Engineering, 2007, 1(1): 51 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  5. BORELLOL, VILLEROG, DALLA VEDOVAM. New asymmetry monitoring techniques: effects on attitude control[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2009, 13(8): 475–487 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. ZUOPeng. Analysis and prevention of B737NG aircraft false trailing edge flap asymmetry[J]. Aviation Maintenance & Engineering, 2019(11): 78–80 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  7. WANGMutian. Briefings of 737NG flap asymmetry shutdown fault and prevention measures[J]. Journal of Civil Aviation Flight University of China, 2019, 30(6): 41–43 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  8. ZHANG Xiongfei. Research on fault diagnosis of retraction and extension of aircraft flap and slat based on QAR data[D]. Tianjin: Civil Aviation University of China, 2020 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  9. MAChao, ZHANGXiongfei, XUJianxin. A risk prediction of aircraft flap asymmetry based on Monte Carlo method[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2020, 38(3): 24–31 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  10. ZHAOHongli, LIUYuwen. Forecasting for aero-engine failure risk based on Monte Carlo simulation[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2015, 41(3): 545–550 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  11. ZHUXiaowei, ZHAOHonghua, GOUJunzhe, et al. Research on performance predictive monitoring of B737NG aircrafttrailing edge flap disagree[J]. Aviation Maintenance & Engineering, 2019(1): 52–54 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  12. JIABaohui, LIAOWenhui, LUXiang. Safety analysis for the landing gear structure on the basis of the non-probabilistic reliability theory[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2021, 21(3): 1005–1011 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  13. KESHTEGARB, BAGHERIM, FEIC W, et al. Multi-extremum-modified response basis model for nonlinear response prediction of dynamic turbine blisk[J]. Engineering with Computers, 2021, 38: 1243–1254 [Google Scholar]
  14. MAXiaojun, RENShuhong, ZUOHongfu, et al. Prediction method of aero-engine life on wing based on LS-SVM algorithm and performance reliability[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2015, 15(3): 92–100 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  15. CHENJ Y, FENGY W, TENGD, et al. Support vector machine-based similarity selection method for structural transient reliability analysis[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2022, 223: 108513 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. ZHOUD, ZHUANGX, ZUOH F. A hybrid deep neural network based on multi-time window convolutional bidirectional LSTM for civil aircraft APU hazard identification[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2022, 35(4344–361 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  17. FENGYunwen, PANWeihuang, LIUJiaqi, et al. Operational reliability of aircraft power plant based on machine learning[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2021, 42(4): 394–404 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  18. LIUJiaqi, FENGYunwen, LUCheng, et al. Safety analysis of aeroengine operation based on intelligent neural network[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2022, 43(9): 136–147 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  19. LUC, FENGY W, LIEMR P, et al. Improved Kriging with extremum response surface method for structural dynamic reliability and sensitivity analyses[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2018, 76: 164–175 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. TENGD, FENGY, LUC, et al. Novel Kriging-based decomposed-coordinated approach for estimating the clearance reliability of assembled structures[J]. Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, 2021, 129(2): 1029–1049 [Google Scholar]
  21. WEIYifu, KAWAMURAYasumi, WANGDeyu. An improved moving least square method and application in structural reliability analysis[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2018, 52(4): 455–460 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  22. FEIC W, LUC, LIEMR P. Decomposed-coordinated surrogate modeling strategy for compound function approximation in a turbine-blisk reliability evaluation[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2019, 95: 105466 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. LIX. Error estimates for the moving least-square approximation and the element-free Galerkin method in n-dimensional spaces[J]. Applied Numerical Mathematics, 2016, 99(1): 77–97 [Google Scholar]
  24. TENGD, FENGY W, CHENJ Y, et al. Structural dynamic reliability analysis: review and prospects[J]. International Journal of Structural Integrity, 2022, 13(5): 753–783 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. ZHAND, XINGH. A fast Kriging-assisted evolutionary algorithm based on incremental learning[J]. IEEE Trans on Evolutionary Computation, 2021, 25(5): 941–955 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. ZHAIX, FEIC W, CHOYY S, et al. A stochastic model updating strategy-based improved response surface model and advanced Monte Carlo simulation[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2017, 82: 323–338 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. FARAMARZIA, HEIDARINEJADM, STEPHENSB, et al. Equilibrium optimizer: a novel optimization algorithm[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2020, 191: 105190 [Google Scholar]
  28. FEIC W, LIH, LUC, et al. Vectorial surrogate modeling method for multi-objective reliability design[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2022, 109: 1–20 [Google Scholar]
  29. TENGD, FENGY W, CHENJ Y. Intelligent moving extremum weighted surrogate modeling framework for dynamic reliability estimation of complex structures[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2022, 138: 106364 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.