EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 41 / No 2 (April 2023) JNWPU, 41 2 (2023) 400-408 References
Open Access
Issue
JNWPU
Volume 41, Number 2, April 2023
Page(s) 400 - 408
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/jnwpu/20234120400
Published online 07 June 2023
  1. NOBLE D F. Schema-based knowledge elicitation for planning and situation assessment aids[J]. IEEE Trans on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1989, 19(3): 473–482. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  2. HUANG Changqiang. Research on key technology of future air combat process intelligentization[J]. Aero Weaponry, 2019, 26(1): 11–19 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  3. ZHAO Fujun, ZHOU Zhijie, HU Changhua, et al. Aerial target intention recognition approach based on belief-rule-base and evidential reasoning[J]. Electronics Optics & Control, 2017, 24(8): 15–19. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  4. JIANG W, HAN D, FAN X, et al. Research on threat assessment based on Dempster-Shafer evidence theory[J]. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 2012, 113: 975–984 [Google Scholar]
  5. BASIR O, YUAN X. Engine fault diagnosis based on multi-sensor information fusion using Dempster-Shafer evidence theory[J]. Information Fusion, 2007, 8(4): 379–386. [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. XIE Hong, PU Jinlong. Research on information fusion method of multi-sensor based on Dempster-Shafer evidence theory[J]. Electro-Optic Technology Application, 2017, 32(2): 41–43. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  7. GE Shun, XIA Xuezhi. DSBN used for recognition of tactical intention[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2014, 36(1): 76–81 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  8. QING J, XIANTAI G, WEIDONG J, et al. Intention recognition of aerial targets based on Bayesian optimization algorithm[C]//2nd IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Engineering, 2017: 356–359 [Google Scholar]
  9. LI Zhanwu, LI Shuangqing, PENG Mingyu, et al. Air combat intention recognition method of target based on LSTM improved by attention mechanism[J]. Electronics Optics & Control, 2023, 30(3): 1–7 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  10. ABDULGHANI Ali Ahmed, MOHAMMED Falah. SAIRF: a similarity approach for attack intention recognition using fuzzy min-max neural network[J]. Journal of Computational Science, 2018, 25: 76–81. [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. CHEN Hao, REN Qinglong, HUA Yi, et al. Fuzzy neural network based tactical intention recognition for sea targets[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2016, 38(8): 1847–1853 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  12. ZHAO Kexin, HUANG Changqiang. The Hierarchical recognition method of autonomous air tactical operation of unmanned combat aircraft[C]//Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Informatics, Environment, Energy and Applications, 2018: 129–133 [Google Scholar]
  13. ZHOU Wangwang, YAO Peiyang, ZHANG Jieyong, et al. Combat intention recognition for aerial targets based on deep neural network[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2018, 39(11): 195–203. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  14. ZAREMBA W, SUTSKEVER I, VINYALS O. Recurrent neural network regularization[C]//International Conference on Learning Representations, 2015 [Google Scholar]
  15. ZHAO Jiahuan, YANG Haiming, QIU Lingcun. Recognition of aerial target types based on recurrent neural network[J]. Aerospace Control, 2020, 38(3): 47–53 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  16. ZHANG H, ZHU T. Aircraft hard landing prediction using LSTM neural network[C]//2nd International Symposium on Computer Science and Intelligent Control, 2018: 1–5 [Google Scholar]
  17. WANG Zhigang, WANG Yeguang, YANG Ning, et al. Construction method of flight data mining model based on LSTM[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2021, 42(8): 262–271 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  18. OU Wei, LIU Shaojun, HE Xiaoyuan, et al. Tactical intention recognition algorithm based on encoded temporal features[J]. Command Control & Simulation, 2016, 38(6): 36–41. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  19. SCHUSTER M, PALIWAL K. Bidirectional recurrent neural networks[J]. IEEE Trans on Signal Processing, 1997, 45(11): 2673–2681 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. KINGMA D P, BA J. Adam: a method for stochastic optimization[C]//International Conference on Learning Representations, 2015 [Google Scholar]
  21. DENG J, GUO J, XUE N, et al. ArcFace: additive angular margin loss for deep face recognition[C]//2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2019: 4685–4694 [Google Scholar]
  22. KIM Y. Convolutional neural networks for sentence classification[C]//Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2014: 1746–1751 [Google Scholar]
  23. CHO K, MERRIENBOER B V, GULCEHRE C, et al. Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation[C]//Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2014: 1724–1734 [Google Scholar]
  24. VASWANI A, SHAZEER N, PARMAR N, et al. Attention is all you need[C]//Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2017: 5998–6008 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.