Open Access
Issue
JNWPU
Volume 43, Number 4, August 2025
Page(s) 784 - 793
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/jnwpu/20254340784
Published online 08 October 2025
  1. JIA Yuchen, CHEN Daolai, JI Linzhang, et al. Information fusion-based aircraft cabin acoustic signal analysis and fault diagnosis[J]. Noise and Vibration Control, 2018, 38(A02): 648–652 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  2. NUGROHO S, NASUTION S M, AZMI F. Analysis of cockpit voice recorder compression reliability for airplane on demand blackbox data transmission[C]//2017 International Conference on Control, Electronics, Renewable Energy and Communications, 2017: 148–152 [Google Scholar]
  3. HSIAO F B, HAN S Y, HSIEH S C, et al. Sound source separation and identification for aircraft cockpit voice recorder[J]. Journal of Aerospace Computing, Information, and Communication, 2004, 1(12): 466–483. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  4. CHENG Daolai, YI Chuijie, YAO Hongyu, et al. A preliminary study on voice information recognition methods for aircraft cockpit voice recorders[J]. Noise and Vibration Control, 2006, 26(3): 81–84 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  5. YANG L. Sound identification and speaker recognition for aircraft cockpit voice recorder[C]//Proceedings of 2010 Asia-Pacific International Symposium on Aerospace Technology, 2010: 260–263 [Google Scholar]
  6. YANG Heng, LU Yu, BAI Wenhu. Aircraft cockpit specific sound signal extraction[J]. Mechanical & Electrical, 2014(12): 16–20 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  7. WU Feng, FU Yanhua, SONG Jian. Feasibility study and application of on-wing decoding of aircraft voice recorder data[J]. Aviation Maintenance and Engineering, 2023(3): 39–41 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  8. PUIGT M, BIGOT B, DEVULDER H. Introducing the "cockpit party proble": blind source separation enhances aircraft cockpit speech transcription[J]. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, 2024, 72(3): 123–135. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  9. SOMESHWAR D, BHANUSHALI D, CHAUDHARI V, et al. Implementation of virtual assistant with sign language using deep learning and TensorFlow[C]//2020 2nd International Conference on Inventive Research in Computing Applications, 2020: 595–600 [Google Scholar]
  10. KUUTTI S, BOWDEN R, JIN Y, et al. A survey of deep learning applications to autonomous vehicle control[J]. IEEE Trans on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2020, 22(2): 712–733 [Google Scholar]
  11. CHAIANI M, SELOUANI S A, BOUDRAA M, et al. Voice disorder classification using speech enhancement and deep learning models[J]. Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, 2022, 42(2): 463–480 [Google Scholar]
  12. MUSHTAQ Z, SU S F. Environmental sound classification using a regularized deep convolutional neural network with data augmentation[J]. Applied Acoustics, 2020, 167: 107389 [Google Scholar]
  13. ZHAO Donghao, ZAHNG Jiguo, SHI Lei, et al. Transformer condition monitoring and fault diagnosis based on characteristic acoustic spectrogram of acoustic signals[J]. Electrical Automation, 2023, 45(1): 106–108 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  14. HU S, CHU Y, WEN Z , et al. Deep learning bird song recognition based on MFF-ScSEnet[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2023, 154: 110844 [Google Scholar]
  15. BUTTERFIELD A J. Data mining of NASA Boeing 737 flight data: frequency analysis of in-flight recorded data[R]. NASA/CR-2001-210641, 2001 [Google Scholar]
  16. LI P, WU J, WANG Y, et al. STM: spectrogram transformer model for underwater acoustic target recognition[J]. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2022, 10(10): 1428 [Google Scholar]
  17. MARTINEZ A M C, SPILLE C, ROBBACH J, et al. Prediction of speech intelligibility with DNN-based performance measures[J]. Computer Speech & Language, 2022, 74: 101329 [Google Scholar]
  18. ARGATOV I, JIN X. Time-delay neural network modeling of the running-in wear process[J]. Tribology International, 2023, 178: 108021 [Google Scholar]
  19. ZHANG Ke, SU Yu, WANG Jingyu, et al. Research on environmental sound classification system based on fusion features and convolutional neural network[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2020, 38(1): 162–169. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  20. HUANG B, SHAO Y, ZHANG H, et al. Design and implementation of a silent speech recognition system based on sEMG signals: a neural network approach[J]. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 2024, 92: 106052 [Google Scholar]
  21. YU Y Q, ZHENG S, SUO H, et al. CAM: context-aware masking for robust speaker verification[C]//2021 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 2021: 6703–6707 [Google Scholar]
  22. WANG H, ZHENG S, CHEN Y, et al. CAM++: a fast and efficient network for speaker verification using context-aware masking[EB/OL]. (2023-06-16)[2024-08-11]. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  23. LIU T, DAS R K, LEE K A, et al. MFA: TDNN with multi-scale frequency-channel attention for text-independent speaker verification with short utterances[C]//2022 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 2022: 7517–7521 [Google Scholar]
  24. THIENPONDT J, DESPLANQUES B, DEMUYNCK K. Integrating frequency translational invariance in tdnns and frequency positional information in 2D resnets to enhance speaker verification[EB/OL]. (2021-09-09)[2024-08-11]. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  25. HEYDARIAN M, DOYLE T E, SAMAVI R. MLCM: Multi-label confusion matrix[J]. IEEE Access, 2022, 10: 19083–19095 [Google Scholar]
  26. ZHANG Y J, SONG W, YUE Y, et al. MaskedSpeech: context-aware speech synthesis with masking strategy[EB/OL]. (2023-05-18)[2024-08-11]. [Article] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.