EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 44 / No 2 (April 2026) JNWPU, 44 2 (2026) 255-270 References
Open Access
Issue
JNWPU
Volume 44, Number 2, April 2026
Page(s) 255 - 270
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/jnwpu/20264420255
Published online 12 June 2026
  1. WANG Xiaojun, YU Ziwen, ZHANG Bing, et al. Progress of POGO suppression technology of launch vehicles at home and abroad[J], Scientia Sinica Technologica, 2014, 44: 492–503. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  2. RUBIN S. Prevention of coupled structure-propulsion instability(POGO)[R]. NASA-SP-8055, 1970. [Google Scholar]
  3. SITU Bin, GAO Puyun. Research on POGO prevention system of low temperature carrier rocket[J]. Cryogenics, 2006, 2: 58–64. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  4. ZHANG Zhi, WANG Nan, LIU Zhusheng. POGO reduction technology of chinese manned launch vehicles[J]. Scientia Sinica Technologica, 2014, 44: 504–509. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  5. ZHANG Qingsong, FAN Ruixiang, GA Yongjing, et al. Dynamic model study of metal bellows accumulator for liquid launch vehicles[J]. Journal of Rocket Propulsion, 2021, 47(2): 81–86. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  6. RILEY G F, STERETT J B. Saturn V/Apollo vehicle pogo stability problems and solutions[C]//AIAA 7th Annual Meeting and Technical Display, Houston, TX, 1970: 1-19. [Google Scholar]
  7. SWANSON L A, GIEL T V. Design analysis of the Ares I POGO accumulator[C]//The 45th Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, Denver, CO, 2009: 1-12. [Google Scholar]
  8. FENWICK J R, JONES J H, JEWELL R E. Space shuttle main engine(SSME) pogo testing and results[J]. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1982, 70(suppl. 1): 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  9. WORLUND A L, JAMIESON J, COLE T W, et al. Cryogenic propellant management: integration of design, performance and operational requirements[C]//Space Shuttle Technical Conference, Houston, TX, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  10. PAYNE J G, RUBIN S. POGO suppression on the Delta vehicle[R]. SAMSO-TR-1974-187, 1974. [Google Scholar]
  11. MULLER S, BREVIERE F, KERNILIS A, et al. Influence of pump cavitation process on POGO diagnosis for the A5E/CA upper stage[C]//46th Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, Nashville, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  12. IACOPOZZI M, LIGNAROLO V, PREVEL D. POGO characterisation of Ariane V turbopump LOX pump with hot water[C]//31st Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, San Diego, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  13. MORI H. POGO analysis based on N-Ⅱ/H-Ⅰ vehicle flight data. N-Ⅱ/H-Ⅰ rocket no flight data[J]. Journal of the Japan Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences, 1991, 39(445): 71–80 [Article]. [Google Scholar]
  14. UJINO T, MORINO Y, KOHSETSU Y, et al. POGO analysis on the H-Ⅱ launch vehicle[C]//16th International Symposium on Space Technology and Science, 1989: 460-467. [Google Scholar]
  15. NAGAI H, NODA K, YAMAZAKI I, et al. Status of H-Ⅱ rocket first stage propulsion system[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 1992, 8(2): 313–319 [Article]. [Google Scholar]
  16. WAN Yilun, FU Xinyu, ZHANG Lihui, et al. Simulation analysis on operating characteristics of gas-filled accumulator system[J]. Journal of Rocket Propulsion, 2018, 44(3): 37–42. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  17. WANG Nan, RONG Yi, HU Jiuhui, et al. Model study on gas-injected POGO suppression system[J]. Missiles and Space Vehicles, 2020(5): 32–37. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  18. ZHANG Qingsong, FAN Ruixiang, ZHANG Bing, et al. Research on gas-filled accumulator system simulation and control law of liquid launch vehicle[J]. Missiles and Space Vehicles, 2022(6): 74–78. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  19. ZHANG Qingsong, FAN Ruixiang, ZHANG Bing, et al. Study of gas filled accumulator system scheme for cryogenic rocket[J]. Missiles and Space Vehicles, 2021(3): 61–65. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  20. MA Fangchao, LIU Wenchuan, CHEN Muye, et al. Research on liquid surface control technology of gas filled accumulator[J]. Missiles and Space Vehicles, 2020(4): 63–67. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  21. SHI Tong, LIANG Guozhu, PAN Hui, et al. Numerical simulation study on flow characteristics of communication port in a launch vehicle gas-filled accumulator[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2023, 44(4): 1–11. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  22. SHI Tong, HE Yunqin, LIANG Guozhu, et al. Theoretic model of flow resistance for gas-filled accumulators in liquid rockets[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2026, 52(1): 214–222. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  23. ZHU Honglai, ZHAO Liwei, LIANG Hongyi, et al. Research on ground thermal stratification and pressure distribution of liquid hydrogen tank based on partition model[J]. Manned Spaceflight, 2023, 29(5): 604–609. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  24. ZILLIAC G, KARABEYOGLU A. Modeling of propellant tank pressurization[C]//The 41st Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, Tucson, AZ, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  25. KIM S M, MUDAWAR I. Review of two-phase critical flow models and investigation of the relationship between choking, premature CHF, and CHF in micro-channel heat sinks[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2015, 87: 497–511 [Article]. [Google Scholar]
  26. HENRY R E, FAUSKE H K. The two-phase critical flow of one-component mixtures in nozzles, orifices, and short tubes[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 1971, 93(2): 179–187. [Google Scholar]
  27. RANSOM D L, DOIRON H H. Experimentally validated pogo accumulator flow resistance model[C]//47th Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, San Diego, CA, 2011: 1-12. [Google Scholar]
  28. LAU K K, EDGE K A, JOHNSTON D N. Impedance characteristics of hydraulic orifices[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 1995, 209: 241–253. [Google Scholar]
  29. LOCKK M H, RUBIN S. Analysis of pogo on the space shuttle: accumulator design guidelines and planar multiengine model development[R]. ATR-1976(7475)-1, 1976. [Google Scholar]
  30. YAO C G, LV H J, YI D Q, et al. Microstructures and mechanical properties of Inconel 718 alloy at ultralow temperatures[J]. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 2018, 27: 2060–2069 [Article]. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.