Open Access
Issue
JNWPU
Volume 36, Number 6, December 2018
Page(s) 1185 - 1192
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/jnwpu/20183661185
Published online 12 March 2019
  1. Smith M S. Military Space Programs: Issues Concerning DOD's SBIRS and STSS Programs[R]. RS21148 Washington D C, USA: Library of Congress, Congressional Research Service, 2005 [Google Scholar]
  2. Lyon R H. Geosynchronous Orbit Determination Using Space Surveillance Network Observations and Improved Radiative Force Modeling[D]. Cambridge, MA, USA, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2004 [Google Scholar]
  3. Liu Lei. Initial Orbit Determination of Space Target Based on the Space Surveillance[D]. Changsha, National University of Defense Technology, 2010 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  4. Tapley B D, Schutz B E, Born G H. Statistical Orbit Determination[M]. San Diego, Elsevier Academic Press, 2010 [Google Scholar]
  5. Ru J F, Chen H M, Li X R. A Range Based Detection Technique for Tracking a Maneuvering Target[C]//Proceedings of SPIE on Signal and Data Processing of Small Targets, 2005 [Google Scholar]
  6. Ru J F, Jilkov V P, Li X R, et al. Sequential Detection of Target Maneuvers[C]//Proceedings of International Conference on Information Fusion, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 2005 [Google Scholar]
  7. Ru J F, Bashi A, Li X R. Performance Comparison of Target Maneuver Onset Detection Algorithms[C]//Proceedings of SPIE Conference on Signal and Data Processing of Small Targets, 2004 [Google Scholar]
  8. Ko H C, Scheeres D J. Maneuver Detection with Event Representation Using Thrust Fourier Coefficients[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2016, 39(5): 1080-1091 [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ko H C, Scheeres D J. Orbit Determination and Maneuver Detection Using Event Representation with Thrust-Fourier-Coefficients[C]//Proceedings of the Advanced Maui Optical and Space Surveillance Technologies Conference, 2015 [Google Scholar]
  10. Ko H C, Scheeres D J. Event Representation Based Orbit Determination Across Unknown Space Events[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2015, 38(12): 2351-2365 [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ko H C, Scheeres D J. Spacecraft Orbit Anomaly Representation Using Thrust-Fourier-Coefficients with Orbit Determination Toolbox[C]//Proceedings of the Advanced Maui Optical and Space Surveillance Technologies Conference, Maui, Hawaii, 2014: 63 [Google Scholar]
  12. Jaunzemis A D, Mathew M V, Holzinger M J. Control Cost and Mahalanobis Distance Binary Hypothesis Testing for Spacecraft Maneuver Detection[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2016, 39(9): 2058-2072 [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jaunzemis A D, Mathew M V, Holzinger M J. Control Metric Maneuver Detection with Gaussian Mixtures and Real Data[C]//25th Spaceflight Mechanics Meeting, 2015 [Google Scholar]
  14. Lubey D P, Scheeres D J. An Optimal Control Based Estimator for Maneuver and Natural Dynamics Reconstruction[C]//Proceedings of the 2013 Advanced Maui Optical and Space Surveillance Technologies Conference, 2013 [Google Scholar]
  15. Lubey D P, Scheeres D J. Combined Optimal Control and State Estimation for the Purposes of Maneuver Detection and Reconstruction[C]//American Control Conference, 2014: 1749-1754 [Google Scholar]
  16. Goff G M, Showalter D, Black J T, et al. Parameter Requirements for Noncooperative Satellite Maneuver Reconstruction Using Adaptive Filters[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2015, 38(3): 361-374 [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lan H, Liang Y, Zhang W, et al. Iterated Minimum Upper Bound Filter for Tracking Orbit Maneuvering Targets[C]//2013 16th International Conference on Information Fusion, 2013: 1051-1057 [Google Scholar]
  18. Jia B, Blasch E, Pham K D, et al. Space Object Tracking And Maneuver Detection Via Interacting Multiple Model Cubature Kalman Filters[C]//2015 IEEE, Aerospace Conference, 2015: 1-8 [Google Scholar]
  19. Goff G M. Orbit Estimation of Non-Cooperative Maneuvering Spacecraft[R]. AFIT-ENY-DS-15-J-051, 2015 [Google Scholar]
  20. Liu Lei, Liu Ye, Cao Jianfeng, et al. Tracking of Uncooperative Maneuvering Space Targets Using Space-Based Angle-Only Measurements[C]//65th International Astronautical Congress, Toronto, Canada, 2014 [Google Scholar]
  21. Vallado D A. Fundamentals of Astrodynamics and Applications[M]. 3rd ed. EI Segundo, CA, Microcosm Press, 2007 [Google Scholar]
  22. Degroot M H, Schervish M J. Probability and Statistics[M]. 4th ed. Boston, Pearson Education, 2012 [Google Scholar]
  23. Gel Y R, Gastwirth J L. A Robust Modification of the Jarque-Bera Test of Normality[J]. Economics Letters, 2008, 99(1): 30-32 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hassani H, Silva E S. Akolmogorov-Smirnov Based Test for Comparing the Predictive Accuracy of Two Sets of Forecasts[J]. Econometrics, 2015, 3(3): 590-609 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Razali N M, Wah Y B. Power Comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson-Darling Tests[J]. Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics, 2011, 2(1): 21-33 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.