Open Access
Volume 37, Number 1, February 2019
Page(s) 114 - 121
Published online 03 April 2019
  1. Xiao J, Liu T, Zhang Y, et al. Multi-Focus Image Fusion Based on Depth Extraction with Inhomogeneous Diffusion Equation[J]. Signal Processing, 2016, 125(5): 171-186 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aymaz S, KÖse C. A novel Image Decomposition-Based Hybrid Technique with Super-Resolution Method for Multi-Focus Image Fusion[J]. Information Fusion, 2019, 45(12): 113-127 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brahmbhatt K N, Makwana R M. Comparative Study on Image Fusion Methods in Spatial Domain[J]. Int J Adv Res Eng Technol, 2013, 4(2): 161-166 [Google Scholar]
  4. Tian J, Chen L. Adaptive Multi-Focus Image Fusion Using a Wavelet-Based Statistical Sharpness Measure[J]. Signal Processing, 2012, 92(9): 2137-2146 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Li S T, Yang B. Multifocus Image Fusion by Combining Curvelet and Wavelet Transform[J]. Pattern Recognition Letters, 2008, 29(9): 1295-1301 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Qu Xiaobo, Yan Jingwen, Xiao Hongzhi, et al. Image Fusion Algorithm Based on Spatial Frequency-Motivated Pulse Coupled Neural Networks In Nonsubsampled Contourlet Transform Domain[J]. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2008, 34(12): 1508-1514 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Geng P, Wang Z, Zhang Z, et al. Image Fusion by Pulse Couple Neural Network with Shearlet[J]. Optical Engineering, 2012, 51(6): 067005 [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jin X, Hou J, Nie R, et al. A Lightweight Scheme for Multi-Focus Image Fusion[J]. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2018, 30(5): 1-27 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  9. Huang W, Jing Z. Evaluation of Focus Measures in Multi-Focus Image Fusion[J]. Pattern Recognition Letters, 2007, 28(4): 493-500 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Easley G R, Labate D, Lim W Q. Optimally Sparse Image Representations Using Shearlets[C]//Fortieth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, 2006: 974-978 [Google Scholar]
  11. Kong W, Lei Y, Zhao R. Fusion Technique for Multi-Focus Images Based on NSCT-ISCM[J]. International Journal for Light and Electron Optics, 2015, 126(21): 3185-3192 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Liu Y, Liu S, Wang Z. A General Framework for Image Fusion Based on Multi-Scale Transform and Sparse Representation[J]. Information Fusion, 2015, 24(3): 147-164 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hang L H G. Research on Image Fusion Based on the Second Generation Curvelet Transform[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2006, 26(5): 657-622 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wang N, Ma Y, Wang W, et al. Multifocus Image Fusion Based on Nonsubsampled Contourlet Transform and Spiking Cortical Model[J]. Neural Network World, 2015, 25(6): 623 [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Li H, Li L, Zhang J. Multi-Focus Image Fusion Based on Sparse Feature Matrix Decomposition and Morphological Filtering[J]. Optics Communications, 2015, 342(56): 1-11 [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Zhou Z, Li S, Wang B. Multi-Scale Weighted Gradient-Based Fusion for Multi-Focus Images[J]. Information Fusion, 2014, 20(5): 60-72 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hossny M, Nahavandi S, Creighton D. Comments on Information Measure for Performance of Image Fusion[J]. Electronics letters, 2008, 44(18): 1066-1067 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Xydeas C S, Petrovic V. Objective Image Fusion Performance Measure[J]. Electronics Letters, 2000, 36(4): 308-309 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Du C, Gao S. Multi-Focus Image Fusion Algorithm Based on Pulse Coupled Neural Networks and Modified Decision Map[J]. International Journal for Lignt and Electorn Optics, 2018, 157(5): 1003-1015 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.