Open Access
Volume 37, Number 1, February 2019
Page(s) 186 - 194
Published online 03 April 2019
  1. Ben Lianliang, Wei Xiaohui, Liu Chenglong, et al. Effects of Air Flow on the Landing Track of the Carrier Aircraft[J]. Ship Science and Technology, 2014, 36(1): 27-30 (in Chinese) [Article] [Google Scholar]
  2. Zhao Yongzhen. Numerical Simulation of Steady and Unsteady Air Flow Field Around Large Ship[D]. Harbin, Harbin Engineering University, 2012 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  3. An Jun. Numerical Simulation of Aircraft Carrier Airwake and Preliminary Study on Control Law for Automatic Carrier Landing[D]. Wuhan, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, 2012 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  4. Duan Pingping. Investigation on Dynamic Performance Analysis for Carrier-Based Aircraft during Landing Process[D]. Nanjing, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2012 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  5. He Shaohua, Liu Dongyue, Tan Dali, et al. A Review of Researches on Ship Airwakes[J]. Ship Science and Technology, 2014, 36(2): 1-7 (in Chinese) [Article] [Google Scholar]
  6. Susan A P. CFD Prediction of Airwake Flow Fields for Ships Experiencing Beam Winds[C]//21st AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Orlando, 2003: 23-26 [Google Scholar]
  7. Susan Polsky, Stephen Naylor. CVN Airwake Modeling and Integration: Initial Steps in the Creation and Implementation of a Virtual Burble for F-18 Carrier Landing Simulations[C]//Proceedings of AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference and Exhibit, 2005: 1-9 [Google Scholar]
  8. Anupam S, Lyle N L. Airwake Simulations on an LPD 17 Ship[C]//15th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Anaheim, California, 2001 [Google Scholar]
  9. Hong Weihong, Jiang Zhifang, Wang Tao. Influence on Air-Wake with Different Layout of Ship Superstructure[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2009, 4(2): 54-68 (in Chinese) [Article] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wang Jinling, Gao Ye, Liu Changmeng. Research on Mesh Type for Complex Ship[J]. Journal Huazhong University of Science & Technology, 2015(11): 99-103 (in Chinese) [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gao Ye. Numerical Simulation of Turbulent Wind Field around Large-Scale Marine Structures[D]. Harbin, Harbin Engineering University, 2014 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  12. Gao Ye, Liu Changmeng, He Zheng. Research on CVN Deck Vortices Structure Characteristics Caused by Wind Direction Changes[J]. Acta Aerodynamic Sinica, 2013, 31(3): 310-315 (in Chinese) [Article] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gao Ye, Xie Huisong. The Numerical Simulation of Flow around the Warship during Ramp Ski-Jump Take-Off[J]. Acta Aerodynamic Sinica, 2008, 26(4): 513-518 (in Chinese) [Article] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gu Xuan. Aerodynamic Analysis on Near-Ground/Sea Motion[D]. Harbin, Harbin Engineering University, 2009 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  15. Cheng Jie. Investigation of Ship Airwake and Rotor Aerodynamics Based on DES[D]. Wuhan, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2015 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  16. Su Dacheng, Shi Yongjie, Xu Guohua, et al. Numerical Study of the Coupled Flowfield of Ship/Helicopter[D]. Acta Aeronautica Astronautica Sinica, 2017, 38(7): 75-86 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  17. Huang Bin. Numerical Study of Coupled Flowfield and Flight Envelop for Shipborne Helicopters[D]. Nanjing, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2015 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  18. Rajmohan Nischint, Zhao Jinggen, He Chengjian. An Efficient POD Technique to Model Rotor/Ship Airwake Interaction[C]//68th American Helicopter Society Annual Forum Fort Worth, Texas, 2012 [Google Scholar]
  19. Fang Zhenping, Chen Wanchun, Zhang Shuguang. The Flight Dynamics of Aerodynamic Aircraft[M]. Beijing, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Press, 2005 [Google Scholar]
  20. Menter F R, Rumsey L C. Assessment of Two-Equation Turbulence Models for Transonic Flows[C]//25th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, Colorado, 1994 [Google Scholar]
  21. Menter F R. Two Equation Eddy Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications[J]. AIAA Journal, 1994, 32(8): 1598-1605 [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.