Open Access
Issue
JNWPU
Volume 37, Number 3, June 2019
Page(s) 443 - 448
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/jnwpu/20193730443
Published online 20 September 2019
  1. UllahZ, KaczmarczykL, PearceC J. Three-Dimensional Nonlinear Micro/Meso-Mechanical Response of the Fibre-Reinforced Polymer Composites[J]. Composite Structures, 2017, 161:204-214 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Yang Zhong. Study on Prediction of Mechanical Performance for Unidirectional Composite Considering Interphase[D]. Harbin, Harbin Institute of Technology, 2010 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  3. VajariD A, GonzálezC, LlorcaJ, et al. A Numerical Study of the Influence of Microvoids in the Transverse Mechanical Response of Unidirectional Composites[J]. Composites Science & Technology, 2014, 97:(16):46-54 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. NayaF, GonzálezC, LopesC S, et al. Computational Micromechanics of the Transverse and Shear Behavior of Unidirectional Fiber Polymers Including Environmental Effects[J]. Composites:Part A, 2017, 92: 146-157 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. PengPai, ZhaoMeiying, WangWenzhi. Transverse Strength Prediction of Composite Materials via Micromechanics Model[J]. Mechanical Science and Technology for Aerospace Engineering, 2017, 36(10): 1611-1618 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  6. GonzálezC, LlorcaJ. Mechanical Behavior of Unidirectional Fiber-reinforced Polymers under Transverse Compression:Microscopic Mechanisms and Modeling[J]. Composites Science & Technology, 2007, 67(13): 2795-2806 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. TotryE, GonzálezC, LlorcaJ. Failure Locus of Fiber-Reinforced Composites under Transverse Compression and Out-of-Plane Shear[J]. Composites Science & Technology, 2008, 68(3): 829-839 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. TotryE, GonzálezC, LlorcaJ. Prediction of the Failure Locus of C/Peek Composites under Transverse Compression and Longitudinal Shear through Computational Micromechanics[J]. Composites Science & Technology, 2008, 68(15): 3128-3136 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. CanalL P, GonzálezC, SeguradoJ, et al. Intraply Fracture of Fiber-reinforced Composites:Microscopic Mechanisms and Modeling[J]. Composites Science & Technology, 2012, 72(11): 1223-1232 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. YangL, YanY, LiuY, et al. Microscopic Failure Mechanisms of Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites under Transverse Tension and Compression[J]. Composites Science & Technology, 2012, 72(15): 1818-1825 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. O'DwyerD J, O'DowdN P, McCarthyC T. Numerical Micromechanical Investigation of Interfacial Strength Parameters in a Carbon Fibre Composite Material[J]. Journal of Composite Materials, 2014, 48(6): 749-760 [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. ParambilN K, GururajaS. Micro-Scale Progressive Damage Development in Polymer Composites under Longitudinal Loading[J]. Mechanics of Materials, 2017, 111: 21-34 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. MarekR. A Study of Deformation and Failure of Unidirectional Fiber-Reinforced Polymers under Transverse Loading by Means of Computational Micromechanics[M]. Switzerland, Springer International Publishing 2016 [Google Scholar]
  14. LublinerJ, OliverJ, OllerS, et al. A Plastic-Damage Model for Concrete[J]. International Journal of Solids & Structures, 1989, 25(3): 299-326 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. YangL, YanY, RanZ, et al. A New Method for Generating Random Fibre Distributions for Fibre Reinforced Composites[J]. Composites Science & Technology, 2013, 76(76): 14-20 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. SodenP D, HintonM J, KaddourA S. Lamina Properties, Lay-up Configurations and Loading Conditions for a Range of Fibre-Reinforced Composite Laminates[J]. Composites Science & Technology, 1998, 58(7): 1011-1022 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.