EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 39 / No 5 (October 2021) JNWPU, 39 5 (2021) 962-970 References
Open Access
Issue
JNWPU
Volume 39, Number 5, October 2021
Page(s) 962 - 970
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/jnwpu/20213950962
Published online 14 December 2021
  1. Lu Jun, Zhang Qunfei, Shi Wentao. Analysis on the key technology of integrated underwater detection and communication[J]. Journal of Unmanned Undersea Systems, 2018, 26(5): 470–479 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  2. Kassem J, Barbeau M, et al. Doppler effect in the acoustic ultra low frequency band for wireless underwater networks[J]. Mobile Networks and Applications, 2018, 23: 1282–1292 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  3. Zhou J, Nie X M, Lin J. A novel laser doppler velocimeter and its integrated navigation system with strapdown inertial navigation[J]. Optics & Laser Technology, 2014, 64: 319–323 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Li Wentao, Nie Xiaoming, Zhou Jian. Method for establishing new integrated navigation system based on two-dimensional laser doppler velocimete[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2020, 47(3): 1–6 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  5. Denbigh P N. Ship velocity determination by doppler and correlation techniques[J]. IEEE Proceeding F-Commanications, Radar and Signal Processing, 1984, 131(3): 315–326 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  6. Zedel L, Hay A E. Resolving velocity ambiguity in multi-frequency, pulse-to-pulse coherent doppler sonar[J]. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 2010, 35(4): 847–851 [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wanis P, Brumley B, Gast J, et al. Sources of measurement variance in broadband acoustic doppler current profilers[C]//OCEANS 2010 MTS/IEEE SEATTLE, Seattle, WA, 2010: 1–5 [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen Y, Yin J, Zou L. Null subcarriers based doppler scale estimation with polynomial interpolation for multicarrier communication over ultrawideband underwater acoustic channels[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering & Electronics, 2015(6): 1177–1183 [Google Scholar]
  9. Abdelkareem A E, Sharif B S, Tsimenidis C C, et al. Time varying doppler-shift compensation for OFDM-based shallow underwater acoustic communication systems[C]//IEEE International Conference on Mobile Adhoc & Sensor Systems, 2011 [Google Scholar]
  10. Tang C, Lian B, Zhang L. Doppler-aided channel estimation in satellite communication base on frequency-domain equalization[C]//2013 Integrated Communications, Navigation and Surveillance Conference, 2013 [Google Scholar]
  11. Yilmaz U C, Cavdar I H. The effects of orbital parameters accuracy on doppler frequency shift for intersatellite optical communication[C]//International Conference on Application of Information & Communication Technologies, 2013 [Google Scholar]
  12. Sen S, Nehorai A. Adaptive design of OFDM radar signal with improved wideband ambiguity function[J]. IEEE Trans on Signal Processing, 2010, 58(2): 928–933 [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rife D C, Vincent G A. Use of the discrete fourier transform in the measurement of frequencies and levels of tones[J]. Bell Labs Technical Journal, 1970, 49(2): 197–228 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  14. Qi Guoqing, Jia Xinle. Accuracy analysis of frequency estimation of sinusoid based on interpolate FFT[J]. Acta Electronica Sinica, 2004, 32(4): 625–629 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  15. Song M, Lim J, Shin D, et al. Enhancing doppler estimation via newton interpolation for automotive FMCW radars[C]//2014 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence, Busan, 2014: 615–616 [Google Scholar]
  16. Lu Songhe. Study on synchronization in multi-carrier mobile underwater acoustic communication[D]. Harbin: Harbin Engineering University, 2009 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  17. Zhao Hongqiang. Analysis of spectrum zoom algorithms[J]. Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering, 2013, 34(5): 105–112 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  18. Sysel P, Rajmic P. Goertzel algorithm generalized to non-integer multiples of fundamental frequency[J]. Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, 2012, 56: 1–8 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ma L, Jia H, Liu S, et al. Low-complexity doppler compensation algorithm for underwater acoustic OFDM systems with nonuniform doppler shifts[J]. IEEE Communications Letters, 2020, 24(9): 2051–2054 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Song Xinchao, Liu Qiming, Su Qingtang. Spectrum correction method based on FFT maximum spectrum phase difference[J]. Contral Engineering of China, 2017, 24(5): 1086–1089 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  21. Huang R, Du X Y, Hu W D. UAV target detection and parameter estimation in non-homogeneous clutter[J]. The Journal of Engineering, 2019, 20: 6750–6754 [Google Scholar]
  22. Ding Kang, Xie Ming, Yang Zhijian. The theory and technology of discrete spectrum correction[M]. Beijing: Beijing Science Press, 2008 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  23. Zhu Xiaoyong, Ding Kang. Comprehensive comparison of discrete spectrum correction methods[J]. Signal Processing, 2001, 17(1): 91–97 [Article] (in Chinese) [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.