EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 39 / No 6 (December 2021) JNWPU, 39 6 (2021) 1212-1221 References
Open Access
Issue
JNWPU
Volume 39, Number 6, December 2021
Page(s) 1212 - 1221
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/jnwpu/20213961212
Published online 21 March 2022
  1. Ghoreyshi M, Jirasek A, Miller T, et al. Implementation and verification of gust modeling in an open-source flow solver[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2019, 92(6): 777–789 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Qiao Lei, Bai Junqiang, Qiu Yasong, et al. High-efficiency solving method for steady transonic flow field[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2018, 44(3): 470–479 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  3. Ll Dali. Research on efficient implicit solver and many-core parallel optimization for structured high-order CFD[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2017 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  4. Denil M, Shakibi B, Dinh L, et al. Predicting parameters in deep learning[C]//Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Lake Tahoe, 2013 [Google Scholar]
  5. Yang Wenhui. Neural network model compression methods based on parameters and features redundancy[D]. Xi'an: Xidian University, 2018 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  6. Du J, Fang F, Pain C C, et al. POD reduced-order unstructured mesh modeling applied to 2D and 3D fluid flow[J]. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 2013, 65(3): 362–379 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. John Burkardt, Max Gunzburger, Lee Hyungchun. POD and CVT-based reduced-order modeling of Navier-Stokes flows[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2006, 196(1): 337–355 [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Qiu Yasong, Bai Junqiang, Hua Jun. Flow field estimation method based on proper orthogonal decomposition and surrograte model[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2013, 34(6): 1249–1260 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  9. Wang Chen, Bai Junqiang, Jan Shehaven, et al. POD-Kriging reduced method's application in tandem cylinders' flow[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2018, 36(2): 220–228 [Article] [Article] (in Chinese) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen Haixin, Deng Kaiwen, Li Runze. Utilization of machine learning technology in aerodynamic optimization[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2019, 40(1): 522480 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  11. Li K, Kou J, Zhang W. Deep neural network for unsteady aerodynamic and aeroelastic modeling across multiple Mach numbers[J]. Nonlinear Dynamics, 2019, 96(5): 1–21 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  12. Saleem W, Kharal A, Ahmad R, et al. Comparison of ACO and GA techniques to generate neural network based Bezier-Parsec parameterized airfoil[C]//The 2015 11th International Conference on Natural Computation, 2015 [Google Scholar]
  13. Zhu L, Zhang W, Kou J, et al. Machine learning methods for turbulence modeling in subsonic flows around airfoils[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2019, 31(1): 015105 [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Liu Changlong. From machine learning to deep learning: effective development based on scikit-learn and TensorFlow[M]. Beijing: Electronic Industry Press, 2019: 173–179 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  15. Kim P, MATLAB deep learning: with machine learning neural networks and artificial intelligence[M]. Berkeley: Apress, 2017: 54–60 [Google Scholar]
  16. Liang R, Li T, Li L, et al. Knowledge consistency between neural networks and beyond[C]//International Conference on Learning Representations, Addis Ababa, 2019 [Google Scholar]
  17. Pan V Y, Chen Z Q. The complexity of the matrix eigenproblem[C]//Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, Atlanta, 1999 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.